Ph. D. Program Graduates










(ordered by year)

Originally titled "Statistics & Evaluative Sciences"
Organizational Behavior is no longer offered. The associated faculty are now predominately associated with the Medical Sociology concentration.

----- All Graduates -----
Brief Listing:
Mollyann Brodie , 1995
Shoo Kim Lee , 1996
Aaron A. Stinnett , 1996
Jack Ven Tu , 1996
Angela Man-Wei Cheung , 1997
Yiing-Jenq Chou , 1997
Haiden Ashby Huskamp , 1997
John Norman Lavis , 1997
Thomas Vincent Williams , 1997
Nancy Beaulieu , 1998
Audiey Kao , 1998
Felicia Eugenia Mebane , 1998
Meredith B. Rosenthal , 1998
Jennifer Prah Ruger , 1998
Alyce Sophia Adams , 1999
Amber Batata , 1999
Johanna Birckmayer , 1999
Scott Gazelle , 1999
Elizabeth Richardson Vigdor , 1999
Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin , 2000
Susan Busch , 2000
Phaedra S. Corso , 2000
Jill Morris Ferdinands , 2000
David Howard , 2000
Lisa Alison Prosser , 2000
Eve Wittenberg , 2000
Deborah Azrael , 2001
Susan Bronskill , 2001
Richard Chapman , 2001
Emmanuela Gakidou , 2001
John McAlerney , 2001
Joshua Salomon , 2001
Bruce Schackman , 2001
Yu-Chu Shen , 2001
Loel Solomon , 2001
David Auerbach , 2002
Jill Horwitz , 2002
Jeanne Marie Madden , 2002
Edmond Toy , 2002
Sally Araki Aalfs , 2003
Elena Elkin , 2003
Federico Girosi , 2003
Fumie Yokota Griego , 2003
Minah Kim , 2003
Kristina Hanson Lowell , 2003
Shanna Shulman , 2003
Colleen Barry , 2004
Janice Cooper , 2004
Juliette Cubanski , 2004
Julie Donohue , 2004
Laura Eselius , 2004
Julia Aledort Gaebler , 2004
William Gnam , 2004
Patricia Keenan , 2004
Douglas Levy , 2004
H. Thomas Stelfox , 2004
David G. Stevenson , 2004
Chapin White , 2004
Kara Zivin , 2004
Colin S. Baker , 2005
Niteesh Choudhry , 2005
Jane K. Kim , 2005
Amy Bird Knudsen , 2005
Sharon Maccini , 2005
Pamela McMahon , 2005
Norman Grantham Miller , 2005
Debra Joy Perez , 2005
Stephanie Shimada , 2005
Benjamin Sommers , 2005
Chien-Chang Wu , 2005
Vivian Wu , 2005
Wei (Wilson) Zhang , 2005
Tanya Bentley , 2006
Thomas Concannon , 2006
Rena Conti , 2006
Benjamin Cook , 2006
Kevin Haninger , 2006
Rachel Mosher Henke , 2006
Cara James , 2006
Srikanth Kadiyala , 2006
Sun-Young Kim , 2006
Kalahn Taylor-Clark , 2006
Carrie Farmer Teh , 2006
Connie Mah Trinacty , 2006
Darren Zinner , 2006
Sara Bleich , 2007
Adam Block , 2007
Syeda Noorein Inamdar , 2007
Melitta Jakab , 2007
Ingrid Nembhard , 2007
Khadija Robin Pierce , 2007
Stephen Resch , 2007
Hector Rodriguez , 2007
Erica Seiguer Shenoy , 2007
Emily Shortridge , 2007
Sara Singer , 2007
Kate Stewart , 2007
Erin Strumpf , 2007
Justin Timbie , 2007
Malcolm Williams , 2007
Jennifer Yeh , 2007
Yuting Zhang , 2007
Rachel Garfield , 2008
Jeremy Goldhaber-Fiebert , 2008
Jaime Staples King , 2008
Joseph Ladapo , 2008
Michael Law , 2008
John Michael McWilliams , 2008
Jessica Mittler , 2008
Janet Rosenbaum , 2008
Eileen Sandberg , 2008
Gillian SteelFisher , 2008
Anne Steffenson , 2008
Karen Grepin , 2009
Jonathan Kolstad , 2009
Katy Backes Kozhimannil , 2009
Manoj Mohanan , 2009
Rebecca Anhang Price , 2009
Carrie Thiessen , 2009
Andrea Ault-Brutus , 2010
Jonathan Clark , 2010
John Connolly , 2010
April Kimmel , 2010
Lucy MacPhail , 2010
Tara Sussman Oakman , 2010
Francesca Matthews Pillemer , 2010
Chara Ryzdak , 2010
Lindsay Sabik , 2010
Anna Sinaiko , 2010

Full Profiles With Abstracts:
Mollyann Brodie
1995, Political Analysis
Current Position: Vice President and Director of Public Opinion and Media Research
Current Employer: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
Thesis Title: Political Institutions, Participation, and Media Evaluations: Influence on Health Care Policy
Committee Members: Blendon, Feldman, Verba
ABSTRACT: This thesis is composed of three distinct papers. Paper one explores the potential for a sensitization effect in research evaluations. This refers to the methodological phenomenon of a pre-event interview sensitizing the respondent such that the post-event measure is different than it would have been without the pre-measure experience. I find evidence for a substantial sensitization effect for panel respondents in an evaluation of a two-hour NBC News special on health care reform. The panel respondents, interviewed both before and after the special, scored consistently higher on health care reform knowledge scales as compared to an independent sample interviewed only after the special, even after accounting for other factors that influence the scores. I conclude that those evaluating the impact of media events on an average audience would be well advised to use an alternative research design than only a panel sample. Paper two explores whether variation across states' political institutions and culture help to explain variation in the health policies states adopt. Using quantitative analysis, I find that state resources, needs, and ideology help to explain variation in health policy outcomes, particularly whether states adopt comprehensive health care reform or consider single payer proposals. Political institutions and culture significantly help to explain the number of incremental health policies aimed at covering the uninsured or controlling costs and the number of mandated health insurance benefits states adopt. Overall, states with more liberal ideologies are more likely to engage in publicly visible comprehensive health reform strategies; whereas political institutions exert more influence on those policies decided away from the public sphere. Paper three explores who the participants were in the 1993-94 national health care reform debate. I find evidence that those active on health care reform were more likely to have more education, to be male, African-American, self-identified conservatives, associated with the health care industry, and engaged in the health care issue. Those with a policy preference for an employer mandate were considerably less active in the health reform debate. Furthermore, the presence of a single payer ballot initiative in California did not disproportionately mobilize self-identified liberals. Overall, legislators heard messages disproportionately from those opposed to comprehensive reform as proposed by President Clinton.


 
Shoo Kim Lee
1996, Economics
Current Position: Scientific Director, iCARE; Professor of Pediatrics; Canada Research Chair (Tier 1) in Knowledge Translation & Healthcare Improvement; Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research Health Senior Scientist
Current Employer: University of Alberta
Thesis Title: The Infant Mechanical Ventilator: Time to Kill The Technology Overkill?
Committee Members: Newhouse, McCormick, Richardson
ABSTRACT: Background. As a result of advances in medical treatment, fewer infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) now require positive pressure mechanical ventilation (PPV), while an increasing number require continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support. Objectives. To determine (1) the feasibility of substituting inexpensive CPAP devices for mechanical ventilators in the NICU without reduction in care, (2) whether SNAP (illness severity score) is predictive of ventilator use, (3) whether non-physician health providers affect practice variations and resource consumption in the NICU. Methods. We prospectively studied the CPAP and PPV needs of infants admitted to the 16 bed level II/III NICU at Boston's Beth Israel Hospital and to 45 bed level II/III NICU at the Brigham and Women's Hospital during the ten month period form March to January 1995, and surveyed the infant mechanical ventilator needs of the greater Hartford region in Connecticut. Results. Assuming the pattern of CPAP utilization at the Beth Israel NICU is generally applicable, CPAP devices could be substituted for 46% of all infant mechanical ventilators in the Northern Connecticut region without reduction of care. A strategy of substituting CPAP devices for infant mechanical ventilators where suitable will result in approximate cost savings of $13.5 million annually (sensitivity analysis range $8.5 million to $14.1 million) in the U.S. alone. SNAP is predictive of mechanical ventilator use in the NICU. There exists variation in ventilator use between the Beth Israel, and Brigham and Women's NICUs which cannot be accounted for by differences in patient characteristics, illness severity or physician differences.


 
Aaron A. Stinnett
1996, Decision Sciences
Current Position: formerly Associate Professor, Department of Health Care Organization and Policy (UAB), Associate Scholar (LHCHP), Director of Economic Evaluation and Modeling Unit (UAB-CORE)
Current Employer: formerly University of Alabama at Birmingham, Lister Hill Center for Health Policy, UAB Center for Outcomes Research and Education
Thesis Title: Issues in the Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions
Committee Members: Weinstein, Paltiel, Siegel
ABSTRACT: The objective of this thesis is to shed light on unresolved issues in the economic evaluation of health interventions. The opening paper addresses the use of constrained optimization techniques for health resource allocation, demonstrating that a general mathematical programming framework can accommodate much more complex information regarding returns to scale, indivisibilities, and program independence than previously has been considered. The second paper presents a new framework for evaluating uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis (ECA). This method expresses the results of an evaluation in terms of the Net Health Benefit (NHB) conferred, where a program's NHB measures the health gain expected to result from implementing that program, compared to implementing its comparator and investing any cost differential in a marginally cost-effective program. This framework offers theoretical and practical advantages over the statistical analysis of cost-effectiveness (C/E) ratios. The third paper evaluates two methods that have been proposed for estimating C/E ratios under second-order uncertainty. One method estimates a mean ratio of cost to effect, and the other estimates a ratio of mean cost to mean effect. It is demonstrated that the "ratio of means" approach follows from the theoretical foundations of CEA and is consistent with an intuitively appealing vector algebra approach to the problem; in contrast, the "mean ratio" approach is internally inconsistent and can prescribe economically inefficient choices. The final paper investigates the cost-effectiveness of diet-and drug-based clinical strategies for cholesterol reduction in men and women at various degrees of risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). A computer simulation model is used to estimate the costs and health effects of strategies employing various combinations of a low-fat diet, niacin, and lovastatin. The results indicate that cholesterol reduction for the prevention of CHD can be relatively cost-effective in a variety of risk factor groups, but that some strategies are significantly more cost-effective than others. Strategies based on diet, niacin therapy, and stepped care (in which patients begin with niacin therapy and switch to lovastatin if they cannot tolerate niacin) tend to be relatively cost-effective. In contrast, nearly all strategies that employ lovastatin as a first-line medication are dominated.


 
Jack Ven Tu
1996, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Senior Scientist (ICES), Canada Research Chair in Health Services Research and Staff Physician (SWCHSC), Professor of Medicine, Public Health Sciences, Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation (UT)
Current Employer: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto
Thesis Title: Quality of Cardiac Surgical Care in Ontario, Canada
Committee Members: McNeil, Morris, Newhouse, Weinstein
ABSTRACT: In this dissertation, a comprehensive study was undertaken to study a number of issues related to the quality of cardiac surgical care in Ontario, Canada. In the first paper, "Coronary artery bypass mortality rates in Ontario: A Canadian approach to quality assurance in cardiac surgery", a study was undertaken to assess the overall in-hospital mortality rate and the amount of inter-hospital variation in risk-adjusted mortality rates following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in Ontario between 1991 and 1993. The overall mortality rate was 3.01%, and no hospitals had risk-adjusted mortality rates significantly higher than expected during the three-year study period. The outcomes in this study are probably attributable to regionalization of CABG surgery and a very low prevalence of low-volume cardiac surgeons in Ontario. In the second paper, "Coronary artery bypass surgery in Ontario and New York State: Which rate is right?", the clinical characteristics of patients and rates of CABG surgery in Ontario and New York State in 1993 were compared. Patients in New York were more likely to be older, female, and have had a recent myocardial infarction while patients in Ontario were more likely to have had left ventricular dysfunction and severe coronary artery disease. It was concluded that there is no single right rate of CABG surgery but rather trade-offs between higher rates of surgery and the clinical severity of patients receiving the procedure. In the third paper, "Predicting mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery: What do artificial neural networks learn?", artificial neural networks (ANNs) and logistic regression (LR) statistical models were developed for predicting in-hospital mortality after CABG surgery in Ontario. The predictions from the ANN model were very highly correlated (r=0.95) with those of a main effects LR model with both models having similar areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The results of this study suggest that ANNs do not offer any significant advantages over LR modeling techniques since both methods "learn" similar relationships between patient characteristics and mortality after CABG surgery.


 
Angela Man-Wei Cheung
1997, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine, Director, Osteoporosis Program, and Associate Director, Women's Health Program
Current Employer: University of Toronto
Thesis Title: The Economic Impact of Primary Prevention: Methods and Applications of Cost- Effectiveness Analysis
Committee Members: Weinstein, Cook, Gillman, Tosteson
ABSTRACT: This thesis examined the methodologies and applications of cost-effectiveness analyses in primary prevention. It is presented in the form of three papers. The first paper examined the lipid-mediated cardioprotective effects of long-term hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women using lipid profile changes observed in the PEPI trial, a multicenter randomized controlled trial of various hormone regimens. Our results showed that the lipid-mediated effects of long-term treatment with various hormone regimens in a 50 year-old postmenopausal woman yield average coronary risk reductions of 12-18%, and average gains in life expectancy of 0.19-0.28 years. The second paper examined the cost-effectiveness of long-term hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. This paper used age-specific incidences of coronary heart disease, breast cancer and hip fractures, and evaluated the balance of the costs and the effects of these diseases in postmenopausal women of different ages. The results of the first paper were used to set the most conservative estimate for the effect of hormone replacement therapy on coronary heart disease. We found that the cost-effectiveness ratio for long-term unopposed estrogen replacement therapy is $27,800 per year of life gained for 50 year-old women without a uterus (discounted at 3% and expressed in 1996 US dollars), and $42,200 for long-term combination therapy for 50 year-old women with a uterus. In general, the cost-effectiveness ratios of long-term hormone replacement therapy for older postmenopausal women are more attractive than for younger postmenopausal women. The third paper examined the cost-effectiveness of blood pressure screening in children. We used longitudinal tracking correlations to predict adult blood pressures from childhood blood pressures, and modeled the effects and costs of various screening and intervention strategies. We found that blood pressure screening strategies for 15 year-old children are more cost-effective than population-wide interventions ($76,000-$131,000 compared with $120,000-$187,000 per discounted year of life gained for boys, and $120,000-$216,000 compared with $212,000-$330,000 per discounted year of life gained for girls). In general, boys have lower (more attractive) cost-effectiveness ratios than girls. Overall, when compared to no screening or intervention, the most cost-effective strategy for the control of blood pressure is screening plus dietary sodium reduction for those who are hypertensive ($76,000 and $120,000 per discounted year of life gained for boys and girls, respectively.) However, neither blood pressure screening nor population-wide interventions are very cost-effective.


 
Yiing-Jenq Chou
1997, Economics
Current Position: Professor, Department of Social Medicine and Institute of Public Health
Current Employer: School of Medicine, National Yang Ming University, Taiwan
Thesis Title: Social Health Insurance and Saving in Taiwan; Health Insurance and Female Labor Supply; and Fertility and the Cost of Having a Child: Can the Government Influence Fertility Rate Through Incentives
Committee Members: Newhouse, Hsiao, Staiger
ABSTRACT: In this thesis, three important health policy issues in Taiwan were studied in three papers. In the first paper, "Social Health Insurance and Saving in Taiwan", a study was undertaken to assess the change in private saving behavior after the introduction of social health insurance in Taiwan. The special features of "Farmer Health Insurance" allowed design of a "natural experiment" for this study. The results show that only farmer families with elderly members responded to the introduction of health insurance by moderately increasing consumption expenditures. The magnitude of the consumption change can be partially explained by the government subsidy, providing some evidence in support of the theory of life-cycle saving. However, the small estimated change in consumption implies that previous studies that stressed the importance of precautionary motives for savings may have been overstated. The second paper, "Health Insurance and Female Labor Supply", examines the impact of employment-linked health insurance on the female's labor participation decision, using natural experiments in Taiwan area to evaluate the importance of the availability of health insurance on female's employment decision. The findings show that an alternative health insurance policy for government employees' wives reduced their probability of being hired as an employee, and decreased their labor participation rate. Implementation of the Universal National Health Insurance Act in 1995 provided a "reverse experiment" that confirms these findings. Consistent results form the two natural experiments imply that the availability of health insurance is an important determinant of Taiwanese women's labor market participation. The third paper is entitled, "Fertility and the Cost of Having a Child: Can the Government Influence Fertility Rate through Incentives? " This paper uses a natural experiment in Taiwan to estimate the effect of incentives on fertility behavior. A change in the government employee benefit plan in July 1993 provides a good instrument for identifying the relationship between the cost of raising a child and the fertility decision. The primary result is that the incentive embodied in the policy change had a positive and significant effect on the birth rate. Government employees indeed responded to the incentive by increasing their fertility rate after the benefit plan change.


 
Haiden Ashby Huskamp
1997, Economics
Current Position: Associate Professor of Health Care Policy, Department of Health Care Policy
Current Employer: Harvard Medical School
Thesis Title: The Economics of Managed Behavioral Health Care Benefit Carve-Outs
Committee Members: Frank, McGuire, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: In the past few years, managed behavioral health care (MBHC) carve-outs have become one of the dominant methods of organizing and financing mental health and substance abuse (MHSA) services. Under a MBHC carve-out, a payer of health care benefits separates the MHSA risk from the health insurance benefit packages it sponsors and enters into a contractual arrangement with a specialty vendor to manage the MHSA benefit only. This dissertation examines the payment arrangements used in managed behavioral health care (MBHC) carve-out contracts, the incentives such arrangements create, and the impact of contract features on the utilization and cost of care. The first essay is an applied theoretical analysis of the agency problem in MBHC contracting which examines optimal risk sharing and the use of an imperfect or "noisy" signal of quality for these contracts. Given certain assumptions, I find that the use of a soft capitation arrangement by the payer is not sufficient to influence the level of quality provided by the vendor. The payer can influence the level of quality by contracting on a noisy signal of quality. The second and third essays use claims and enrollment data to assess the impact on MHSA expenditures and treatment patterns of a MBHC carve-out program adopted by the Massachusetts Group Insurance Commission (GIC) in 1993. The GIC carve-out program used a soft capitation arrangement with weak incentives for controlling costs, contracted on several noisy signals of quality by creating financial incentives based on imperfect quality measures, expanded the MHSA benefit, and implemented a care management process for MHSA services. The financial incentives in the contract were tightened slightly at the end of the first year after implementation of the carve-out program. Adoption of the GIC carve-out program was associated with a substantial decrease in the probability of receiving any MHSA services, a dramatic drop in total costs per MHSA treatment episode, and a shift away from the use of facility care towards the use of outpatient care for MHSA treatment. Individuals with certain severe MHSA conditions received fewer services on average after the carve-out program was adopted. The tightening of the financial incentives at the end of the first year was associated with a further decrease in the probability and level of MHSA expenditures. The magnitude of the vendor's response to the weak financial incentives and the further decline in the probability and level of expenditures after the incentives were tightened slightly suggest that MBHC vendors are very sensitive to the financial incentives they face.


 
John Norman Lavis
1997, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Professor, Dept. of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatitics (MU), Assoc. Member, Dept. of Political Science (MU), Member, Center for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (MU), and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange (CIAR)
Current Employer: McMaster University, and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
Thesis Title: An Inquiry Into the Links Between Labour-Market Experiences and Health
Committee Members: Newhouse, Cleary, Pierson, Tarlov
ABSTRACT: In the first of three papers I developed a research framework with which to conceptualize and plan research on the health consequences of labour-market experiences. The first half of the framework comprises a typology of labour-market experiences and the second half comprises the range of possible health and economic outcomes of these experiences. Using the framework I identified the most serious gaps in the research literature: limited attention to interactions between experiences and between experiences and the context for these experiences; limited or no attention to some increasingly prevalent experiences; and no simultaneous measurement of health and economic outcomes. In the second paper I examined the relationship between unemployment and mortality in 2868 male household heads followed for up to 25 years and 2676 male household heads followed for up to 16 years as part of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. I used annual measures of unemployment as time-varying variables in Cox regression analyses and controlled for annual measures of potential confounders (race, marital status, income, education, and employment grade). Men who were unemployed one or more times on the day of the annual survey had a higher hazard of death while in the labour force than men who were working on the day of the survey (hazard ratio 3:23 [1.61-6.48]). Men who experienced longer unemployment spells died earlier while in the labour force or retirement than those who experienced shorter (or no) unemployment spells (hazard ratio1.03 [1.00-1.05] for a one week change in the duration of unemployment). No clear relationship emerged between the number of unemployment spells and mortality. In the third paper I developed a conceptual framework to identify institutional innovations or policy changes in Canada and the United Kingdom which may have come about, at least in part, because of the determinants-of-health synthesis and to determine the role that these ideas played in the politics associated with these developments. Elite interviews and reviews of primary and secondary sources suggested that the policy-relevant ideas embodied in the determinants-of-health synthesis played strategic, rather than instrumental, roles in any institutional innovation or policy change.


 
Thomas Vincent Williams
1997, Organizational Behavior
Current Position: Director, Health Program Analysis and Evaluation
Current Employer: Department of Defense, TRICARE Management Activity
Thesis Title: Physician Experiences and Evaluations of Managed Care Organizations: Perceived Organizational Support in Health Care
Committee Members: Cleary, Ayanian, Soumerai
ABSTRACT: Physicians are increasingly working in managed care organizations. At the same time these organizations apply some combination of regulatory, financial, or normative mechanisms to influence clinical decisions of physicians within them. The outcome of this management on the job attitudes of physicians is most important for its effect on the core content of their work. Physician satisfaction with managed care plans and their recommendations of it to others may indicate a high level of support to quality of care and management that allows independent judgement and clinical freedoms to treat in ways they view as appropriate. The first empirical study of this thesis asked physicians to evaluate the resources and procedures of one of the managed care plans they worked with and to assess the extent to which the management strategies used by that plan influence their clinical behavior and the quality of care available to their patients. Physicians said that use of education and peer influence as management strategies had greater influence over their clinical behavior and facilitated the provision of high quality care more than the use of rules and regulations or financial incentives. Plans with the most positive evaluations were plans that physicians said used educational strategies more and that used rules and regulations and financial incentives less. The second empirical study of this thesis investigates the association of participation in more than one managed care organization and reported autonomy. The increasing participation of physicians in managed care has led to increasing involvement in managed care plans and greater numbers of managed care contracts. It was felt that complexity of managing more than one health care contract would compound the administrative burden of patient care and practice management. The second study did not indicate an association between autonomy and participation for the sample of physicians. It did establish the important nature of organizational support to essential features of a physician's task environment. The number of denials and lower reports of administrative support were strong predictors of lower reports of clinical autonomy.


 
Nancy Beaulieu
1998, Economics
Current Position: formerly Visiting Assistant Professor
Current Employer: Sloan School of Management, MIT
Thesis Title: Quality Information and Quality Competition In the Managed Care Health Insurance Market
Committee Members: Cutler, Green, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: This thesis explores three aspects of quality information and quality competition in the managed care health insurance market. In the first chapter, economic theories of non-price competition and insurance market competition are combined to develop a theoretical model of the managed care health insurance market. This model generalizes previous models of insurance markets and identifies the inefficiencies of the private market in promoting social welfare. The results of the model suggest the development of non-market mechanisms to improve quality and highlight the importance of risk-adjustment. In the second chapter, another model is developed to understand the impact of overlapping provider networks on quality competition between health plans. Overlapping provider networks imply a shared set of inputs for health plans competing in the same market. This organizational phenomenon is shown to generate an externality that leads to lower equilibrium levels of quality and reduced incentives for quality improvement. The results of the model have implications for the economic evaluation of exclusive provider networks; it is found that exclusivity may lead to improvements in quality and that these improvements should be weighed against potential losses from reductions in price competition. The findings of the model also suggest an important role for non-market mechanisms in stimulating the development and diffusion of new technologies to improve quality. The third chapter is an empirical analysis of the effect of information about quality on consumers' health plan choices. A natural experiment was created when employees of Harvard University were given quality information on the health plans in which they could enroll. Panel data on employees and health plans were analyzed to assess the effect of the information. The results of an econometric analysis indicate that some employees did respond to the information by choosing a health plan with a higher quality rating. The analyses also found that employees differed in their responsiveness to the information according to characteristics such as age, employment tenure, and previous health plan enrollment. The primary policy implication of this analysis is that the provision of quality information, if improperly managed, may lead to distortion in the allocation of resources.


 
Audiey Kao
1998, Organizational Behavior
Current Position: Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Medicine (UCH), and Vice-President for Ethics Standards (AMA)
Current Employer: The University of Chicago Hospital, and American Medical Association
Thesis Title: Trust and Agency: The Patient-Physician Relationship in the Era of Managed Care
Committee Members: Cleary, Bradach, Marsden
ABSTRACT: Trust is essential in social life. Interpersonal relationships are complex and often unpredictable, and as such, trust minimizes the cognitive and emotional hesitancy of individuals, groups, and communities to engage in mutually beneficial exchanges. Without some degree of trust, joint action and cooperation are limited by explicit contracts, while potentially beneficial social relationships fail to develop altogether, due to prohibitively high transaction and monitoring costs. Therefore, trust serves as an "efficient" catalyst that increases the likelihood of joint action and broadens the possibilities of social cooperation. Due to the central importance of trust as a social catalyst, it has been the focus of considerable scholarly interest among sociologists, psychologists, and economists. Despite this academic interest in the social value of trust, few attempts have been made to investigate, either conceptually or empirically, the "epidemiology" of this social good. Conceptual clarity and empirical research is especially lacking in social relationships where trust is seen as a fundamental component of a good dyad. One such social dyad is that between patients and their physicians, and the lack of academic inquiry into trust is that it has been taken for granted. In Paper One of my thesis, the goal is to shed light on the complexities and nuances of interpersonal trust, with particular emphasis on the therapeutic relationship between patients and their physicians. Moving beyond the precepts offered by perspectives that characterize persons as self-interested agents or embedded moral beings, a dynamic model of interpersonal trust that does not characterize trust as an all or none phenomenon based on either a "market-based" or a "virtue-based" ethic is developed. In this model, patients and physicians are participants in an interdependent, but inherently asymmetric social dyad, where patients' trust in physicians is dependent on a "role-based" ethic of the medical professional. In Paper Two, and following my explication of a more complete model of interpersonal trust, the development of a reliable and valid measure that is designed to assess patients' trust in their physicians is presented. Patient trust directly stems from the physician's role-based obligations to his or her patient. As a physician-confidant, I feel obligated to keep patient information confidential. As a physician-informant, I feel impelled to reliably inform patients of all relevant medical information. As a physician-craftsman, I feel accountable to provide patients with competent advice and care. As a physician-advocate, I feel bound to act in the patient's best interest, even at the risk of forgoing personal interests. Therefore, a scale of patient trust should capture these role-based aspects of a physician-professional. In Paper Three, the goal here is to use the Patient Trust Scale in order to evaluate the impact of significant organizational changes in the health care system on trust in the patient-physician relationship. In this era of managed care, the influence of third parties, and more specifically the direct financial incentives imposed by health plans and insurers, on clinical decision making has raised concerns about physicians serving as double agents who have conflicting obligations to patients and health care organization. Therefore, the relationship between methods of physician reimbursement and patient trust is examined.


 
Felicia Eugenia Mebane
1998, Political Analysis
Current Position: Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management, and Assistant Dean of Student Affairs
Current Employer: Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Thesis Title: The Politics of Medicare Policy
Committee Members: Blendon, Feldman, Reeves, Staiger
ABSTRACT: This thesis includes three studies that further illuminate various aspects of a key political determinant of Medicare policy: public opinion. For the first study, I use data provided by the Kaiser Family Foundation to examine media coverage of Medicare during the 1995 federal budget debates. Using descriptive statistics, I link changes in the level of critical coverage of President Clinton and the Republican leadership to changes in the public's support for their ability to address Medicare's problems. I also use probit regressions to show that coverage of policy-related topics tended to be less critical of these newsmakers. I conclude that policymakers concerned with how the public will receive future efforts to reform Medicare should continually evaluate their coverage and seek ways to focus on policy-related topics. For the second study, I use a public opinion survey conducted in 1995 and provided by Professor Robert J. Blendon to explore whether or not knowledge of the Medicare program affects preferences for Medicare policy. I reveal that knowledge has small, significant impacts on the likelihood of support for five of six Medicare policy options. I also find large, significant information effects for subsets of the population. Finally, I find that the effect of information varies with the type of information tested. I conclude that educating the public about the Medicare program matters primarily for interest groups that may benefit from activating particular segments of the population. Finally, participation in the election process is one manifestation of public opinion about campaign issues. For this study, I use American National Election Studies data to compare political participation and mobilization of older and younger Americans in 1996 with the corresponding rates of participation and mobilization in 1988 and 1992. I find that the political environment in 1996 (in which Medicare was a prominent campaign issue) did seem to stimulate different rates of political participation among older Americans. The results were mixed for mobilization efforts. I conclude that this likely link between issues salient for older Americans and political participation will become increasingly important with the aging of the "baby boom" cohort.


 
Meredith B. Rosenthal
1998, Economics
Current Position: Associate Professor of Health Economics and Policy, Department of Health Policy and Management
Current Employer: Harvard School of Public Health
Thesis Title: Risk Sharing in Managed Care
Committee Members: Frank, Cutler, Newhouse, Zeckhauser
ABSTRACT: Managed care continues to evolve in the pursuit of sustainable cost savings. In its early form, the industry relied on "command and control" mechanisms to influence physician practice style and reduce the cost of care. In response to the backlash from physicians and patients against the encroachment of managed care into the doctor-patient relationship, health plans are seeking alternative ways of containing costs. This dissertation explores one of these alternatives that is increasingly prevalent and controversial: risk sharing with providers. There is concern that putting physicians at risk for the cost of treating patients compromises ethical principles and may lead to reductions in the quality of care. To help inform the debate about risk sharing in managed care, the three papers that comprise my thesis explore issues related to the design of risk sharing contracts as well as their impact in an outpatient mental health setting. The first paper presents an economic model of physician contracting in which physicians affect multiple dimensions of health care utilization. The objective of the paper is to investigate whether the variation in risk sharing contracts observed in managed care may be explained in part by the need for health plans to give incentives to physicians to practice efficiently while minimizing unnecessary risk exposure. My results support the idea that contractual form may be selected so that physicians bear risk only on the margin where they exert substantial control. The second and third papers of my dissertation evaluate the impact of a natural experiment in which a managed behavioral health plan changed from a fee-for-service to a case-rate system for reimbursing behavioral health groups for outpatient mental health care. The second paper demonstrates that the case-rate reimbursement system reduced visits per episode by approximately 15 percent. In addition, there was evidence that visits that were likely to be of lower value were more likely to be eliminated. Finally, the response to the case rate varied according to how heavily invested in managed care the group was (share of revenue from risk contracts) and how intensively they monitored member clinicians. In the third paper, I explore whether the reduction in utilization associated with the introduction of the case rate was associated with measurable differences in quality of care. Looking at the process of care, I found that case-rate patients were more likely to be referred to community and self-help programs, perhaps as substitutes for therapy. In addition, they were more likely to be medicated than fee-for-service patients. Finally, in terms of the best measure available in the data of health status improvement from treatment, change in global assessment of functioning (GAF), no difference could be detected.


 
Jennifer Prah Ruger
1998, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Associate Professor
Current Employer: Yale Schools of Public Health Medicine and Law (Adjunct) and Graduate School of Arts and Sciences
Thesis Title: Aristotelian Justice and Health Policy: Capability and Incompletely Theorized Agreements
Committee Members: Sen, Green, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: The dissertation focuses on the implications for health policy of Aristotelian/Capability lines of reasoning to social justice and efficiency. The monograph draws on philosophical and economic analysis and social choice theory in the examination of health capabilities as: (i) a central focal variable for the assessment of equality and efficiency in health policy; (ii) the product of health and other public policies; and (iii) the object of social choice. Drawing on moral and political philosophy, the Aristotelian/Capability lines of reasoning provide the basis for the special moral importance of health capabilities as the central focal variable for assessing equality and efficiency in health policy. These lines of thought take a universal view of humans' capability to flourish as an end of political activity and provide an analytical framework to address questions of justice and efficiency in public policy in a way that other philosophical schools do not. Drawing on economic analysis, the monograph makes a case for focusing attention in health economics and health policy on the economics of health, per se, as differentiated from the economics of medical care, and as such emphasizes the analysis of empirical evidence on the instrumental effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the various determinants of health and the public policies associated with these determinants. Further investigations of the determinants and consequences of variations in health capabilities is necessary to fully understand the patterns and public policies associated with health production. And finally, drawing on social choice literature, this monograph identifies and defends a particular approach to collective decision making in public policy - incompletely theorized agreements (ICTA). In matters of social decision making about health capabilities in health policy, the ICTA framework is particularly useful and complementary to the capability approach. Health, and thus health capabilities, is a multidimensional concept about which different people have different, and sometimes, conflicting, views. Since no unique view of health capabilities exists and is ideal for all evaluative purposes, the pragmatism of both the incomplete ordering of the capability approach and the incompletely theorized agreement on that ordering of the ICTA approach allow for reasoned public policy decision making and analysis in particular situations in the face of plural goods and different, even conflicting, views.


 
Alyce Sophia Adams
1999, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Research Scientist, Division of Research
Current Employer: Kaiser Permanente
Thesis Title: How Tribes Choose Between Tribal and Indian Health Service Management of Health Care Resouces; Drug Coverage and Drug Use by Medicare Beneficiaries; Bias in Measures of Guideline Adherence
Committee Members: Kalt, Frank, Rubin, Soumerai
ABSTRACT: This dissertation is composed of three separate studies. The first paper is entitled "The Road Not Taken: How Tribes Choose Between Tribal and Indian Health Service Management of Health Care Resources". It examines trends in tribal management of health care resources since passage of the American Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 (PL 638). Administrative data were used to identify characteristics of tribes that chose to take over management of health care service units from the Indian Health Service between 1980 and 1995. An unresponsive local Indian Health Service, a large tribal bureaucracy, and greater tribal financial resources were all predictive of tribal management. In order to fulfill the promise of the 1975 legislation, Congress should address issues of inequity in Indian Health Service responsiveness and inadequate funding for health care services. The second paper, "The Use of Prescription Drugs by Medicare Beneficiaries with Hypertension: Does Drug Coverage Matter?", explores the relationship between coverage for outpatient prescription drugs and the use of essential medications by Medicare beneficiaries with hypertension. Controlling for demographic and health status characteristics, we found a significant and positive association between drug coverage and consumption of anithypertensives. We also explored the use of a propensity score to control for selection bias due to adverse selection and eligibility rules. Given what we know of the life-saving potential of antihypertensive agents, we have a moral and ethical obligation to ensure that all persons with hypertension have coverage for these essential medications. The final paper, "Evidence of Self-Report Bias in Assessing Adherence to Guidelines", examines trends in the use of self-report measures in research on adherence to practice guidelines and the impact of response bias on the validity of these measures. The use of self-report measures increased from 18% of studies in 1980 to 41% of studies in 1985. Further, in 87% of 37 comparisons, self-reported adherence rates exceeded the objective rates, resulting in a median over-estimation of adherence of 27% (absolute difference). Given evidence of response bias, we recommend that self-reports be used only in conjunction with objective measures in studies of guideline adherence.


 
Amber Batata
1999, Economics
Current Position: P&R Director (Pricing&Reimbursement)
Current Employer: MAx PCBU (Market Access, Primary Care Business Unit), Pfizer, Inc.
Thesis Title: Economic Analyses of Medicare HMOs
Committee Members: Staiger, Cutler, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: My dissertation consists of three essays, all of which attempt to broaden our knowledge of the economic implications of managed care, particularly for the elderly, in the market for health insurance. Managed care insurance combines physician and insurer behavior in such a way that is thought to reduce inefficiency in medical care and improve access to and delivery of preventive medicine. The first essay estimates how responsive Medicare managed care (or HMO) enrollment is to prices and finds that a $100 increase in monthly capitation payments led to a 3.8 percentage point increase in Medicare HMO enrollment in 1997. The second essay determines that the elderly who join HMOs cost approximately $1100 less than the average cost of those remaining in the traditional Medicare sector and this selection is leading to significant overpayments to managed care plans, particularly in the first year of enrollment. The third essay (joint with Ellen Meara) tries to shed light on the quality implications of managed care and finds that higher HMO enrollment leads to later diagnosis of lung cancer (which is largely untreatable) and, to a lesser extent, later diagnosis of colon, breast and cervical cancers, all of which have proven benefits for early diagnosis and treatment.


 
Johanna Birckmayer
1999, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Director, International Research
Current Employer: Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids
Thesis Title: The Role of Alcohol and Firearms in Youth Suicide and Homicide in the United States
Committee Members: Hemenway, Soumerai, Howland
ABSTRACT: Homicide and suicide are, respectively, the second and third leading cause of death for young Americans. The following three papers address two risk factors for suicide and homicide, alcohol and gun availability. Two studies examine the association between an alcohol policy designed to reduce youth access to alcohol -- minimum legal drinking ages -- and youth suicide and homicide. The third paper explores the relationship between suicide rates and levels of household gun ownership by age of the victim. Since 1970, numerous state legislatures have enacted changes in the legal drinking age creating a natural experiment to test the effects of these law changes. Available data suggest that MLDAs affect the quantity of alcohol, especially beer, consumed by youth. The first two studies in this dissertation use pooled cross sectional time series mortality data from the 48 contiguous states from 1970 to 1990 to examine the association between varying MLDAs and youth suicide and homicide. In the first paper, a significant association is identified between the minimum legal drinking age and youth suicide. The analysis suggests that the suicide rate of 18 to 20 year olds living in states with an 18 year old MLDA was 8% higher than the suicide rate among 18 to 20 year olds in states with a 21 year old drinking age. In the second paper, no association is found between the MLDA and homicide rates. The third paper explores the hypothesis that the availability of firearms may have a differential effect on suicide rates, depending on the age of the potential victim. Suicide rates and levels of household gun ownership are analyzed in the nine census regions for the years 1979 to 1994. Levels of gun ownership are highly correlated with suicide rates among 15 to 24 year olds and 45 to 84 year olds, but not among 25 to 44 year olds.


 
Scott Gazelle
1999, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Professor of Radiology (HMS), Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management (HSPH), Director, Partners Radiology, and Director, Institute for Technology Assessment (MGH)
Current Employer: Harvard Medical School & Harvard School of Public Health & Massachusetts General Hospital
Thesis Title: Cost-Effectiveness of Imaging and Surgery in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
Committee Members: Weinstein, Kuntz, Hunink
ABSTRACT: This study examines options for diagnostic imaging and surgical management of patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The objective of the study was to better understand the cost, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of hepatic resection ("metastasectomy") in these patients, and to investigate the impact of different pre- and post-operative diagnostic imaging regimens on the costs and effectiveness of therapy. In order to perform the analysis, we developed and validated a series of state-transition (Markov) decision models. These models were used to investigate: 1) the likelihood of missing liver metastases, given certain assumptions concerning test sensitivity, operative threshold, and the number of metastases present; 2) the cost-effectiveness of hepatic metastasectomy in patients with limited hepatic metastases; and 3) the impact of diagnostic imaging on the cost-effectiveness of therapy. Our principal findings were as follows: 1) hepatic metastasectomy, within the general bounds established for the analysis, appears to be a relatively cost-effective procedure for the management of patients with limited hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma; 2) more aggressive approaches to imaging and resection should be preferred over less aggressive approaches in this patient population; 3) there appears to be a survival benefit, at a reasonable cost, even in patients who ultimately develop post-operative recurrences following metastasectomy; and, 4) when considering the cost and effectiveness of a variety of management strategies, across a population of patients with hepatic metastases, the benefits associated with more frequent pre- and post-operative imaging and more sensitive imaging tests are sufficient to justify their increased cost. Our results strongly support an aggressive approach to imaging and treatment in patients with potentially resectable metastases from colorectal carcinoma. From a cost-effectiveness perspective, it appears that hepatic metastasectomy should be encouraged, and that all surgeons and oncologists should be encouraged to expand their criteria for patient selection for this procedure. However, it is critical that the results of our studies be confirmed by actual clinical experience, and also by detailed and prospective collection of data concerning the costs and outcomes associated with imaging and surgery in this patient group.


 
Elizabeth Richardson Vigdor
1999, Economics
Current Position: Research Scholar
Current Employer: Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University
Thesis Title: Measuring Health and Assessing the Impact of Health System Change
Committee Members: Cutler, Frank, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: This thesis explores each of the steps in the process linking health system change to output: changes in access, changes in health, and the valuation of health. The first chapter derives an economic framework for measuring and valuing health and presents estimates of the change in population health over the past 40 years. We define "health capital" as the discounted value of the current and future utility associated with individual health. We measure health capital empirically using data on mortality and morbidity from chronic disease. Our estimates suggest that health capital at birth increased by about $100,000 between 1970 and 1990, and health capital at age 65 increased by about $169,000. The increase in health capital at birth and age 65 are both greater than the increase in average medical spending over that time period. Chapter 2 examines the relationship between managed care penetration growth and change in the number of hospitals and emergency rooms. I find that growth in managed care penetration can explain between 19 and 37 percent of the decrease in hospitals and between 0 and 56 percent of the decline in emergency rooms in low income areas between 1984 and 1994. None of the decline in hospitals or emergency rooms in higher income areas can be attributed to managed care. I also find that distance to the nearest hospital in California cities increased by 22 percent for the poor and 16 percent for the non-poor over this period. I estimate that this would lead to a one percent drop in inpatient utilization by the poor and a 0.8 percent decline for people in higher income areas. The third chapter examines the impact of hospital closings on health outcomes. I look at the effect of hospital closures on rates of admission for avoidable hospitalizations. I also examine differences in mortality and length of stay for two urgent conditions. I find weak evidence that people experience adverse health outcomes when an urban hospital closes, and that this effect increases with poverty status. Overall, the results are inconclusive but suggest that further study is necessary.


 
Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin
2000, Economics
Current Position: Health Economist and Co-Director, Center for Health Care Organizations, Economics, and Financing
Current Employer: RAND Corporation
Thesis Title: Risk Selection in the Medicare Program
Committee Members: Newhouse, Frank, Swartz
ABSTRACT: Risk selection is a major impediment to the functioning of health insurance markets and a serious problem for those who seek to introduce more competition into the Medicare program. Ideally, health care providers should compete on the basis of cost and quality. Whenever providers are paid a fixed amount per patient or per service, however, they have an incentive to compete to attract patients who are healthier (and hence more profitable) than the population as a whole - a practice known as "risk selection." This dissertation investigates the determinants of risk selection among competing Medicare plans, examines econometric issues involved with modeling health care costs and risk selection, and seeks better ways to compensate Medicare plans that experience favorable or adverse selection.

Chapter one investigates whether or not standardizing Medicare HMOs' benefits packages would reduce risk selection. Policymakers have expressed the hope that standardization would reduce health plans' ability to risk select by constructing benefits packages that are differentially attractive to healthy beneficiaries. I find evidence that plans' relative copayment levels, physician network sizes, and quality all influence risk selection among plans. Thus, the standardization of benefits packages would restrict consumers' choices without preventing risk selection. Given this finding, in chapter two I look for ways in which Medicare payments to plans could be "risk adjusted" to reflect the expected costs of plan enrollees. I focus on decedents since they have high costs. I find that while Medicare payment systems could be improved by paying more for beneficiaries with certain terminal illnesses, incentives would remain to select against the terminally ill. Chapter three focuses on methodological issues. It presents and evaluates alternative econometric methods of modeling risk selection and predicted health care cost measures such as the selection measure used in chapter one.


 
Susan Busch
2000, Economics
Current Position: Associate Professor of Health Policy
Current Employer: Yale School of Public Health, Yale School of Medicine
Thesis Title: Measuring Productivity and Quality in Mental Health Care
Committee Members: Frank, Berndt, Huskamp
ABSTRACT: The treatment of mental illness has undergone significant organizational and technological change in the past decade. Spending continued to grow at rates above changes in general price in the 1990s. Are increased mental health expenditures due to price increases, quantity increases or some combination? What has been the effect of these recent changes on quality of care? This thesis addresses these questions. Mental health carve-outs separate the insurance risk of mental health care from that of general medical care and are increasingly common in both the public and private sector. In the first chapter I focus on the quality of treatment for depression in one mental health carve-out. Comparing treatment patterns in the pre- and post-carve-out period, I find that although quality declined over the course of the time period studied, implementation of the carve-out was associated with an increased probability of receiving guideline-level treatment. Although broad trends in medical spending have received widespread attention from policymakers, very little attention has focused on the components of those changes. In the second chapter, colleagues and I make use of results from clinical literature, and identify therapeutically similar treatment bundles that are then linked and weighted to construct price indexes for the treatment of major depression. In doing so, we construct medical price indexes that deal with prices of treatment episodes rather than discrete inputs, that are based on transaction prices, that take quality changes and expected outcomes into account, and that employ current, time-varying expenditure weights in the aggregation computations. We find that over the 1991-1995 time period this treatment price index has hardly changed, remaining at 1.00 or falling slightly to around 0.97. This index grows considerably less rapidly than the various official PPIs. A hedonic approach to price index measurement yields broadly similar results. In the third chapter I reported on additional analysis that indicate this bias is due to either between-item-strata substitution (63 percent) or failure to account for quality change (37 percent). This suggests recent modifications to BLS methodology will have little effect on the bias in official price indexes in so far as treatment for depression is a representative condition.


 
Phaedra S. Corso
2000, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Associate Professor in Health Policy
Current Employer: Department of Health Policy Administration, Biostatistics, and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Georgia
Thesis Title: Evaluating Preferences for Health Risks
Committee Members: Graham, Dicker, Goldie, Hammitt
ABSTRACT: This thesis considers different methods used to elicit individual preferences for health and safety issues in a series of three papers developed from an empirical analysis of a large national survey. The first paper explores the use of contingent valuation (CV), as elicited through willingness-to-pay (WTP), as a method for valuing mortality-risk reductions. Previous empirical work suggests that CV estimates of WTP are invalid because WTP estimates are insensitive to the quantity (or magnitude) of the good being valued. In a test of alternative visual aids to communicate magnitude of risk, we found that WTP was statistically sensitive to the magnitude of risk reduction for all groups receiving a visual aid, but not for the group that did not receive an aid. These results suggest that CV can provide valid estimates of WTP for mortality-risk reduction if appropriate methods are used to communicate the risk change to respondents. The second paper explores the underlying axiomatic assumptions that allow one to use quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as a health outcome measure. In an assessment of risk-neutrality and consistency in risk posture for longevity, we found that risk posture appears to depend on remaining life expectancy and other dimensions of the choice, including the difference in risk, the asymmetry of probabilities, and whether one choice alternative included a certain outcome. These results suggest that the use of QALYs as an outcome measure may be jeopardized since individual preferences for remaining longevity are not consistent. In a third paper, we compare the use of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) and direct democracy for allocating scarce resources between prevention and treatment interventions. We found that two methods for measuring social benefits, WTP and voting, yield dissimilar policy implications, with the former suggesting that treatment programs be funded, and the latter suggesting that prevention programs be funded. Our data also indicate that general opinions about the costs and effectiveness of prevention versus treatment significantly influence voting choices, in addition to such other non-normative factors such as a bias for action. These results indicate that relying on one method for eliciting preferences for use in resource-based decisions for prevention or treatment may not be adequate.


 
Jill Morris Ferdinands
2000, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Epidemiologist, Influenza Division; and Commander (USPHS)
Current Employer: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and US Public Health Service
Thesis Title: Methods for Modeling and Valuing Life Expectancy Gains
Committee Members: Graham, Hammitt, Kuntz
ABSTRACT: Over the past decade, there has been increasing concern over the inability of society to afford the growing number of health-related interventions. Decision-makers have turned to the tools and techniques of economic analysis to illuminate the trade-offs associated with different policy decisions. This thesis presents three studies that contribute to the improvement of methods for the economic evaluation of interventions that extend human lives. The first study focuses on methods used to predict life expectancy gains. We use a novel combination of observed epidemiological relationships and disease simulation to infer knowledge about the underlying effects of aspirin use on colorectal cancer. We find that aspirin likely acts at multiple points in the disease process by exerting a strong influence early in the disease and a relatively weaker influence later in the disease, a result with implications for the effectiveness (and cost-effectiveness) of aspirin as a chemopreventive agent for colorectal cancer. From a methodological perspective, this study illustrates the ability of simulation modeling to generate important new insights about the disease process. The second paper focuses on estimating the monetary value of life expectancy gains by using stated willingness to pay for two life-extending interventions. Our analysis reveals a troubling disparity between estimates of the value of a statistical life year derived from the two goods. That the disparity cannot be explained suggests that the value of a statistical life year may not be a readily generalizable metric for monetizing life expectancy gains. The third study focuses on examining alternative methods for communicating the benefits of interventions that extend human lives. We find that survey respondents valued benefits expressed as a life expectancy gain more highly than identical benefits expressed as a reduction in annual mortality risk. Using sensitivity to scope as a validity test, we find that the life expectancy format demonstrates greater validity, implying that the monetary value of longevity benefits may be more likely to reflect true preferences if elicited using a life expectancy format. In summary, the three studies presented herein contribute to the ongoing search for methods to credibly estimate the magnitude and value of life expectancy gains. Enhancing the validity of these methods will help us more efficiently allocate society’s scarce resources among the growing number of competing programs that extend human lives.


 
David Howard
2000, Economics
Current Position: Associate Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management
Current Employer: Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University
Thesis Title: The Economics of Organ Allocation
Committee Members: Newhouse, Frank, Swartz
ABSTRACT: Unlike most goods and services, organs are distributed according to an administratively-determined point formula. This formula must balance competing goals, including the need to minimize organ wastage, the maximization of human life, and the equitable distribution of resources. This dissertation examines the current system for allocating livers in light of these goals. When an organ becomes available, wait-listed patients are ranked in order of medical urgency and the organ is offered to the surgeon of the first patient on the waiting list. Surprisingly, 45 percent of livers are rejected by the first surgeon to whom they are offered. The first chapter shows, using data from the national organ allocation registry, that surgeons’ behavior is consistent with an optimal stopping problem; surgeons reject poor quality organs for healthy patients in the hope that they will receive a better organ offer in the future. A structural model shows that surgeons’ willingness to use poor-quality organs is responsive to technological change and organ availability. One criticisms of the current allocation system is that many patients are placed on the waiting list in a healthy state but only receive a transplant once they reach the sickest urgency category, at which point their ability to survive the transplant operation is diminished. The rest of the dissertation examines this aspect of the allocation system. Chapter 2 presents estimates of the effect of waiting time on the probability of transplant success. Using blood type as an instrument, waiting time is found to have a clinically and statistically significant effect on outcomes. Chapter 3 presents a simulation model of patient outcomes under various allocation rules. The current sickest-first rule results in a large loss of health between listing and transplant, and this loss is directly related to the ratio of organ demand to supply. The fourth and final chapter presents three principles by which to evaluate organ allocation rules. Unlike the standard ethical criteria, these take account of the fact that patient urgency is endogenously determined; a rule that prioritizes patients by urgency will cause more patients to become urgent in the first place.


 
Lisa Alison Prosser
2000, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Research Associate Professor, Child Health and Evaluation Unit, Division of General Pediatrics; Adjunct Assistant Professor
Current Employer: University of Michigan Health System; Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School
Thesis Title: Patient Preferences and Economic Considerations in Treatment Decisions for Multiple Sclerosis
Committee Members: Weinstein, Kuntz, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: This thesis explores the role of patient preferences in treatment decisions and in the cost-effectiveness of three treatments for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The first chapter reports the results of a survey conducted to measure utilities for six health states and three treatment states in multiple sclerosis. Patients assign high utilities to milder MS health states and disutility is associated with the treatment health states. Mean utilities for the treatment health states were lower than those for the milder MS health states. These results provide support for a hypothesis that a patient’s decision to discontinue treatment is rational. The second chapter examines the role of risk attitude and treatment choice in patients with multiple sclerosis. Patients’ risk profiles regarding health and money were assessed using standard-gamble questions. The main finding of this chapter is that risk attitude is related to treatment choice for patients with MS. As patients become more risk seeking, they are more likely to forgo treatment. Treatment discontinuation, however, is not associated with risk attitude. Patients who discontinue do so because they have experienced moderate or severe side effects, regardless of risk preference. An additional finding of this paper is that risk attitude varies across domains. While respondents were, on average, risk averse with respect to money, they were risk neutral on health. Therefore, risk attitude regarding money may not be an appropriate proxy for risk attitude regarding health. The third chapter evaluates the cost-effectiveness of interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and glatiramer acetate in patients with multiple sclerosis. A computer simulation to model the effects and costs of treatments in multiple sclerosis was developed. Cost-effectiveness ratios for all three treatments are unfavorable under most assumptions, unless the cost of the drug is substantially reduced. All three treatment strategies are strongly dominated in the base case analysis; for treatment duration of five years or less, benefits are not large enough to overcome disutility associated with the treatments. Using alternative assumptions, cost-effectiveness ratios are still greater than $1,000,000/QALY in most cases. Under favorable assumptions, cost-effectiveness ratios may be as low as $460,000/QALY for IFNB-1a.


 
Eve Wittenberg
2000, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Senior Scientist
Current Employer: Schneider Institutes for Health Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University
Thesis Title: Health Risk Behaviors, Preferences and Policies
Committee Members: Graham, Goldie, Light, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: : This dissertation address health behavior in response to risk, and public preferences regarding risk. Health behavior is explored in two papers on the topic of child seating behavior in motor vehicles. Seating position is the behavior of interest, in response to the health risk to children posed by passenger air bags. Paper #1 is an empirical study of child seating behavior in vehicles traveling in New England. From a sample of 503 drivers observed and interviewed in 1998, we found that the presence of passenger air bags in vehicles was independently associated with a decreased chance of children being seated in the front seat. This result suggests that drivers were adjusting their behavior in response to the hazard posed by air bags to children. Paper #2 reports on an accompanying study that analyzed trends in child seating behavior from 1990 through 1998 in vehicles involved in fatal crashes. Using a national database of fatal crashes to identify predictors of child front seating, we found that while the frequency of front seating declined in all vehicles over this period, greater declines were associated with the presence of both a passenger air bag and younger children in the vehicle. These results confirmed and extended our New England findings, implying that the behavioral response to the air bag hazard was greater for younger children. Public preferences regarding risk were explored in the context of the role that risk characteristics play in preferences regarding health policies. Papers #3 and 4 present the development and implementation of a preference elicitation instrument. We describe the application of a constructivist approach to preference elicitation, as well as measures of survey effectiveness and the use of internal verification mechanisms in data interpretation. Our results demonstrate that two particular risk attributes, voluntariness and personal controllability, are important influences on preferences. In the health scenarios we explored, the public preferred to reduce risks of equal magnitude that were involuntary or uncontrollable, compared to those that were the converse. Our findings suggest that economic analyses of health programs that involve risk should consider the effect of risk attributes on preferences.


 
Deborah Azrael
2001, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Research Associate, Department of Health Policy and Management; Associate Director, Harvard Youth Violence Prevention Center; Co-Director, National Violent Injury Statistics System
Current Employer: Harvard School of Public Heatlh
Thesis Title: Firearms: Storage and Use at Home and Use in Suicides by Children
Committee Members: Hemenway, Soumerai, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT: Each year in the United States, tens of thousands of people are killed with firearms, and many more are injured. The three papers which make up this dissertation address one aspect of the problem of gun violence in the United States: the use and storage of guns within homes and families. The first paper describes the results of a nationally-representative random digit dial telephone survey of U.S. adults, the objective of which was to assess the relative frequency and characteristics of weapons-related events at home. The study finds that guns may be used at least as often by family members to frighten intimates as to thwart crime, and that other weapons are far more commonly used against intruders than are guns. The second paper, also based on the results of a nationally representative telephone survey, finds that within gun-owning households with children, non-gun owners are far more likely to report that guns are stored safely than those who personally own guns. The results of the study suggest the possibility that non-gun owners, generally women, are not well-informed about how guns are stored in their homes. The third paper uses data from the Arizona Childhood Fatality Review team to assess the correlates of suicide by children. The paper finds that children who use guns to kill themselves are less likely than those who use other methods to have experienced a life crisis or to have expressed suicidal thoughts in the past.


 
Susan Bronskill
2001, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Scientist, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, and Assistant Professor, Department of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation
Current Employer: University of Toronto
Thesis Title: Improving Comparisons in Health Services Research
Committee Members: McNeil, Cutler, Newhouse, Normand
ABSTRACT: Comparisons of service use and outcomes data across providers, across regions and over time are made to assess performance and to guide resource allocation in health care systems. These data are, however, inherently observational and subject to many sources of variability. To be informative and useful to policymakers, comparative analyses must recognize and account for variability in underlying data. Methods that achieve these goals improve the precision of estimates, account for important covariates, and assess the impact of trends. This dissertation analyzed three prominent observational data sets, two for cardiac care and one for mental health care, to investigate methods for improving the characterization and comparison of health service utilization and outcomes. In Chapter One, hierarchical models were extended and applied to examine outcomes for cardiac surgeons and mental health networks over time. Provider-specific outcomes were compared based on level, rate of change over time, and a combination of both. Longitudinal information supplemented cross-sectional analysis by revealing whether and how much more rapidly the outcomes of an individual provider were increasing (or decreasing) relative to other providers. A multivariate approach helped to describe and combine multiple outcomes. In Chapter Two, risk-adjusted, in-hospital patient mortality rates for cardiac surgeons were compared using three different analytical models to determine differences in the detection of outliers. Compared with pooling data over three years, a model that accounted for variation within and between surgeons identified fewer surgeons as high or low outliers. Similar results were obtained for a model that incorporated additional longitudinal variation. In Chapter Three, the extent to which factors beyond characteristics of the patient, such as discharging hospital attributes and state factors, contributed to variations in post-acute service use were examined in a cohort of elderly Medicare patients after acute myocardial infarction. Using detailed data sets and a hierarchical model, patient severity of illness at hospital discharge, for-profit ownership of the hospital, and hospital provision of home health services were identified as important predictors of post-acute service use. After adjusting for many patient and hospital characteristics, however, variation in post-acute service use remained across states.


 
Richard Chapman
2001, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Principal, US Health Economics & Outcomes Research
Current Employer: IMS Health
Thesis Title: Improving the Comparability of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses
Committee Members: Neumann, Weeks, Weinstein
ABSTRACT: To compare cost-effectiveness ratios across studies, we must have some assurance that the analyses that produced the ratios used similar methods. Findings of methodological variation have led to calls for greater standardization of cost-effectiveness analyses. However, there is concern that demanding too much methodological rigor could stifle the use of these analyses, by making it difficult to conduct them in a timely and inexpensive manner. This dissertation explores this issue in three related papers. The first uses an audit of 228 cost-utility analyses to create a comprehensive league table that lists costs/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), and to identify the subset of published studies that come closest to fulfilling the methodological criteria for reference case analyses, as described by the USPHS Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. The comprehensive league table of 647 interventions provides a useful reference, but ratios may not be comparable because of varying methodologies. The standardized table presents 112 ratios from studies that met basic methodological criteria, allowing comparison with future Reference Case analyses. The second paper compares community preference weights obtained from patients using a generic health-state classification system, those obtained directly from patients, and the same preference weight assessments from a convenience sample of clinical experts. The preference weights estimated by clinicians were significantly lower than those provided by patients with non-small cell lung cancer, unless clinicians were given detailed information on patients' health status. Health state descriptions that included the disease name seemed to bias clinicians' estimated preference weights. The third paper investigates the impact of health-related quality of life adjustment on the results of cost-effectiveness analyses, by comparing ratios from studies that have reported both costs per (unadjusted) life-year and costs per QALY. In a sizable fraction of studies, the use of quality adjustment did not substantially alter the estimated cost-effectiveness of a health-care intervention. The collection of preference weight data should be subjected to the same scrutiny as other data inputs to cost-effectiveness analyses, and should only be undertaken if the value of this information is likely to be greater than the cost of obtaining it.


 
Emmanuela Gakidou
2001, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Associate Professor of Global Health, and Director of Education and Training, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
Current Employer: University of Washington
Thesis Title: Health Inequality: Definition, Measurement and Determinants
Committee Members: King, Anand, Cutler, Frenk
ABSTRACT: Health inequality is defined as differences in health status across individuals in a population. I present a conceptual framework for the measurement of health inequality, influenced by the long tradition of measurement of income inequality. It is suggested that the ideal for a population would be to achieve equality in individual healthy life expectancy. Healthy life expectancy is the number of years in full health that an individual born today can expect to live. To summarize the distribution of healthy life expectancy a measure of inequality has to be selected. The issues surrounding the selection of a measure are normative. Rather than arbitrarily selecting a measure, an Internet survey of health professionals was conducted to elicit preferences on the normative issues involved in selecting a measure of inequality. The results of this survey are presented and used to select an index of inequality. The inequality measurement framework is then operationalized in the measurement of inequality in child survival in 50 developing countries. The distribution of probability of death across children in each country is estimated using two models: an extended-beta binomial and a random effects logit model. The two models are compared and their results, which do not differ statistically, are shown. Finally, an analysis is undertaken of the effect of key determinants on health inequality, particularly the effect of income inequality and education inequality. Other determinants, such as level of health expenditure, poverty, and urban/rural residence, are also studied. This analysis finds that the determinants most often cited in the literature do not explain the majority of the differences in health inequality across developing countries. The epidemic of HIV/AIDS is shown to have an effect on health inequality, potentially by creating groups of high-risk individuals in populations. It is also suggested that some of the variation across countries could be due to differences in the distribution of health services and resources between urban and rural areas. More data should be collected at the local level, so that the effect of other variables, particularly ones pertaining to health systems, can be analyzed.


 
John McAlerney
2001, Economics
Current Position: Assistant Professor, Boonshoft School of Medicine and Raj Soin College of Business; Health Economist, Center for Global Health Systems, Management, and Policy
Current Employer: Wright State University
Thesis Title: Stretching the Safety Net: Child Participation in Public Insurance and the State of Community Health Centers
Committee Members: Newhouse, Needleman, Swartz
ABSTRACT: Non-participation by children eligible for public insurance programs in the United States has been a persistent dilemma for policymakers. Paper One begins by developing a participation model to determine differences between children who enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP and children who did not. The analyses utilize data from the 1998 Ohio Family Health Survey (OFHS) and find that children in poorer health and those who resided in counties with higher levels of expenditures on outreach were also more likely to enroll. Half of all parents with uninsured but eligible children reported that they were unaware of their child's eligibility and very few indicated that the reason for non-enrollment was related to pride or to hassles regarding the enrollment process. Findings from this study demonstrate a substantial need to increase awareness about program eligibility and to identify subgroups that would benefit from targeted outreach strategies. A recent report on the health care safety net by the Institute of Medicine recommends the monitoring of community health centers (CHCs) because of the many fiscal and operating challenges they currently face. Paper Two and Paper Three respond to this recommendation. Paper Two uses data from the Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC) to analyze recent payor-mix changes and to assess the financial health of CHCs from 1996 to 1999. Results show that many individual CHCs have been subject to fluctuations in uninsured and Medicaid users. Troubling is the finding that more than half of all CHCs reported a deficit in 1997, 1998 and 1999. Paper Three formalizes an examination of CHC integration activity to determine whether strategic adaptation or institutional theory best explains the present organizational behavior of CHCs. Data obtained from multiple case studies show that CHC integration activity was substantial, varied and consistent with the organizational behavior model of strategic adaptation. Together with Paper Two, the results of Paper Three provide clear evidence that monitoring of CHC financial health and their organization behavior should continue.


 
Joshua Salomon
2001, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Associate Professor of International Health, Department of Global Health and Population (HSPH)
Current Employer: Harvard School of Public Health and Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies
Thesis Title: Empirical Approaches to Modeling HIV and Hepatitis C
Committee Members: C Murray, Goldie, Hammitt, Weinstein
ABSTRACT: This thesis describes applications of mathematical models to three distinct problems. The common objective of the three papers was to take full advantage of all available data sources in constructing and fitting models of disease processes, their impact at the population level or the potential costs and benefits of interventions. The goal of Chapter 1 was to extend previous models of HIV/AIDS epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa in order to improve the methodological basis for epidemiological estimates given limited available data sources. A simple model was developed in which past trends in HIV incidence were back-calculated from data on the prevalence of infection in adults. The model was then used to develop estimates and ranges of uncertainty around HIV/AIDS epidemics in four countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Chapter 2 describes a more complex model of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemic in the United States. The objectives of the study were to develop a comprehensive model that was consistent with both the current understanding of the natural history of the disease and the observed impact of the disease at the population level. Extensive model-fitting was undertaken through multiple simulations using model parameter values sampled from plausible ranges. The parameter values that were consistent with observed data on prevalence and mortality were identified and used to explore uncertainties about the natural history and epidemiology of HCV. Chapter 3 presents a re-examination of the cost-effectiveness of treatment for HCV. A series of analyses were undertaken in order to examine the impact of critical modeling assumptions about disease progression rates and health-related quality of life in HCV-infected patients on conclusions about the potential costs and benefits of different treatment strategies. The results of this study suggest that key uncertainties around the prognosis and health experience of HCV patients may be inadequately reflected in conventional sensitivity analyses, but may have important implications for the clinical management of individual patients and for broader health policy decisions.


 
Bruce Schackman
2001, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Associate Professor of Public Health and Chief, Division of Health Policy
Current Employer: Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College
Thesis Title: The Cost-Effectiveness of Early Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV-Infected Adults
Committee Members: Weinstein, Goldie, Swartz
ABSTRACT: Since 1996 there has been a dramatic shift in the treatment outlook for HIV-infected individuals as a result of the introduction of new antiviral drug regimens. The decision when to initiate antiretroviral drug therapy requires making a tradeoff between the benefits of early treatment and possible long-term drug toxicities. Because the government is the primary health care payer for the majority of HIV-infected patients, their access to early therapy is determined by the availability of government programs. Chapter One develops a set of baseline utility weights for examining treatment-related quality of life tradeoffs, using data from a survey of HIV-infected patients at various stages of disease. Differences between community and patient utility weights and their implications for cost-effectiveness analyses are explored. Patient utility weights for HIV/AIDS health states were generally higher than community utility weights, and when treatment side effects were important these differences could affect cost-effectiveness ratios for early versus later initiation of therapy. Chapter Two examines the impact of two antiretroviral treatment side effects, cholesterol changes and fat redistribution symptoms, on the cost-effectiveness of early antiretroviral therapy. The analysis was conducted using a state-transition computer model to simulate the natural history of HIV disease and the impact of the treatment side effects on life expectancy and quality of life. Changes in cholesterol associated with antiretroviral therapy alone did not appear to be sufficient to justify deferral of treatment. Although the impact of fat redistribution symptoms on quality of life will vary among individual patients, this effect is unlikely to substantially change the cost-effectiveness of initiating early therapy under current treatment guidelines for most patients. Chapter Three projects the costs to government payers of Section 1115 Medicaid demonstration projects to improve access to early treatment for HIV-infected patients in Georgia and Massachusetts. The proposed demonstration projects affected the budgets of several government payers including Medicaid, Medicare, AIDS Drug Assistance Programs, and other state payers. In assessing expanded access to early treatment, government payers should consider overall budgetary effects and should assess costs separately for each year's enrollees in order to avoid incentives to cap program enrollments.


 
Yu-Chu Shen
2001, Economics
Current Position: Associate Professor of Economics; Faculty Research Fellow
Current Employer: Graduate School of Business and Public Policy, Naval Postgraduate School; National Bureau of Economic Research
Thesis Title: The Effect of Market Reforms and Ownership Choice on the Quality of Care in Hospitals
Committee Members: Cutler, Newhouse, Staiger
ABSTRACT: This thesis explores how market reforms in the third party payer system and hospitals' choice of ownership status affect the quality of care in hospitals, using patient health outcomes after treatment for acute myocardial infarction as quality indicators. The sample of analysis consists of a 10-year panel of all general, acute, short-term stay hospitals in the continental United States between 1985 and 1994. The first chapter examines the effect of financial pressure on the quality of care in hospitals. The two financial pressure variables are: policy changes in Medicare reimbursement formulas for inpatient care, and changes in health maintenance organization (HMO) penetration at the county level. I find that financial pressure adversely affects short-term health outcomes, but does not affect patient survival beyond one year after patients' hospital admissions. Furthermore, the impact of HMO penetration appears to differ from that of policy changes in Medicare for certain hospitals (hospitals in competitive markets, teaching, and for-profit hospitals) because HMO encourages price competition. The second chapter focuses on the identification of the effect of hospital ownership on the quality of care in hospitals. I find strong evidence that not-for-profit (NFP) hospitals indeed produce better health outcomes than for-profit (FP) or government hospitals by 3-4%. The results are consistent under different model specifications, and are robust to whether I use the entire sample or smaller samples that match hospitals based on the propensity score method or on the geographical distance. The third chapter examines changes in the quality of care in hospitals after ownership conversions that occurred between 1987 and 1994. I find that the incidence of adverse outcomes increases by 7-9% following an ownership conversion to FP status. However, there is very little change in the patient outcomes for hospitals that convert to NFP or government status. The results are not driven by the change in patient mix or the presence of rough transitions following the conversion, but could be explained by the reduction in staffing ratio.


 
Loel Solomon
2001, Organizational Behavior
Current Position: Director, Community Health Initiatives and Evaluation
Current Employer: Kaiser Permanente
Thesis Title: Assessing Patient-Reported Quality in Medical Group Practices: An Analysis of Data from the National Field Test of the Group-Level CAHPS Instrument
Committee Members: Cleary, Landon, Marsden, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT: There is growing interest in measuring the quality of healthcare provided by medical group practices. In 1999, the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the California HealthCare Foundation funded the development and field testing of a version of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS©) questionnaire for use in medical group practices. CAHPS© is presently the national standard for measuring patients' experience with their health plans. This dissertation analyzes data from the national field test of the Group-Level CAHPS (G-CAHPS) instrument. Paper #1 describes the field test design and assesses the psychometric properties of the G-CAHPS instrument, including its factor structure, scale reliability, inter-unit reliability and validity. Response rates ranged from 45% to 55% across our five study sites. Factor analysis of the items selected for the core instrument suggests five distinct dimensions of patient-reported quality including access to care, patient/doctor communication, PCP/specialist coordination, advice on preventive health, and courtesy and respect shown by the office staff. The field test demonstrated adequate levels of reliability and validity. Using a series of ANOVA models and variance components analysis, Paper #2 assesses the ability of the instrument to discriminate among groups and evaluates the influence of nested organizational structures on G-CAHPS measures. Organizational units evaluated include: health plans, multi-group entities akin to independent practice associations and physician/hospital organizations, medical groups and individual practice sites. Results indicate that the G-CAHPS instrument has adequate power to discriminate among groups for the majority of measures, but that group-level measurement masks substantial sub-unit variation in performance. Paper #3 examines the organizational determinants of patient-reported quality, including: 1) organizational structure (i.e., number of practice locations, specialty mix and size); 2) decision-making processes (i.e., extent of formalization and decentralization) and; 3) practice management strategies (i.e., visit planning, non-visit care and extended hours). Using path analysis and hierarchical liner modeling, this analysis suggests that decentralized decision-making has a pervasive and negative influence on patients' experience of care. Other organizational attributes with significant influences on patient-reported quality include visit planning, practices' approach to quality improvement, size, affiliation with a multi-site group and staff turnover.


 
David Auerbach
2002, Economics
Current Position: Principal Analyst
Current Employer: Health and Human Resources Division, Congressional Budget Office
Thesis Title: The Economics of Long-Term Care Decision-Making Among the Elderly
Committee Members: Cutler, Huskamp, Buchanan, Staiger
ABSTRACT: In the first chapter, the question of whether individuals respond to financial incentives in nursing home entry decisions is answered. The motivation for this work is to shed light on long-term care decisions in general and to inform State policy decisions which partly govern individual nursing home subsidy eligibility through Medicaid. Using the first three waves of the longitudinal Asset and Health Dynamics of the Oldest Old dataset (1994-1998), and an algorithm simulating individual Medicaid eligibility, it is found that behavioral responses to subsidies differ highly by subgroup - namely, the responsiveness of demand to the level of subsidy was substantial for unmarried individuals (-.5), and especially those suffering a recent, moderate health shock. Married elderly are quite insensitive to Medicaid subsidies, and entered nursing homes only with higher levels of disability than other groups. The data suggest that informal care is preferred to nursing home care, and that there is little worry, therefore, of a 'woodwork' effect (crowd-out) in which elderly forego care from spouses or children to take advantage of subsidized nursing home care. The second chapter uses the same dataset to investigate adaptation to permanent health shocks among the elderly in a study intended to be generalizable to all populations. Adaptation behavior was assessed via a multiple regression model which simulates the experiment in which individuals suffer a negative health event causing their health status (functional disability) to decline to a new, worse level. Only a weak form of adaptation was observed in that self-reports of health status (SRHS) never approached levels preceding the shock but did eventually improve and apparently approach a new, albeit more pessimistic level. Younger age and higher income (but not social support) aided the adaptation process. The third chapter focuses specifically on the widely used SRHS measure itself and its relationship with socioeconomic status using two self-reported health measures from the National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey. It is found that elements of high socioeconomic status (income, education, white) are associated with higher SRHS even controlling for objective health but evidence of mechanisms governing the relationship only weakly support the hypothesis that psychosocial factors are involved.


 
Jill Horwitz
2002, Ethics
Current Position: Louis and Myrtle Moskowitz Research Professor of Business and Law
Current Employer: University of Michigan Law School
Thesis Title: Corporate Form of Hospitals: Behavior and Obligations
Committee Members: Brandt, Cutler, Minow, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: Despite many similarities among firms, the hospital industry consists of three types: for-profit, not-for-profit, and government firms. This dissertation explores the behavioral, moral, and legal implications of the corporate form of hospitals. It addresses three related questions: Does organizational form affect the provision of hospital services, and if so, why? Do behavioral differences justify a preference for the not-for-profit form? Why do hospitals change corporate forms and to what effect? Chapter One is a statistical analysis of over thirty hospital services. It identifies differences in service provision among different hospital types. The paper concludes that these differences are best understood as reflecting differences in hospital goals. For-profit hospitals are more profit-seeking than the other types. Public hospitals aim to provide needed, but unprofitable, goods to a greater degree than the other types. Not-for-profit hospitals are in the middle- to some extent they pursue profitable services, to some extent they act like public institutions in providing for public need. Further, the ownership characteristics of the hospital's neighbors influence the hospital's decision to invest in particular services. Chapter Two is a defense of the not-for-profit form. It further develops the implications of the behavioral differences described in Chapter One. It explains how not-for-profit hospitals provide private and public goods that conventional markets fail to provide. Further, the paper shows that not-for-profit hospital behavior is consistent with the behavior required by law and morality. The moral argument, which is developed as a theory of not-for-profit ethics, is also presented as a potentially independent reason for preferring not-for-profit hospitals. The chapter advances several implications of the findings for the legal debate regarding corporate form, for health policy, and for tax policy. Chapter Three is co-authored with David Cutler. Based on case studies of two hospital conversions, it examines the reasons for and effects of hospital conversions from not-for-profit to for-profit status. It suggests two primary reasons for conversions: financial and cultural. The paper also finds that the conversions improved the financial performances of the hospitals, in part by cutting costs and increasing public sector reimbursement.


 
Jeanne Marie Madden
2002, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Instructor, Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention
Current Employer: Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
Thesis Title: Evaluating the Effects of Two Successive Policies; Regarding Obstetrical Lengths of Stay
Committee Members: Soumerai, Lieu, Newhouse, Ross-Degnan
ABSTRACT: This dissertation evaluates effects of two policies affecting a large health maintenance organization (HMO) population: an "early discharge" program featuring one hospital overnight plus a nurse home visit after uncomplicated vaginal delivery; and, subsequent Massachusetts law guaranteeing 48 hours of hospital coverage. Retrospective data on 20,366 normal vaginal births between October 1990 and March 1998 spanned both interventions. Outcome measures were aggregated into quarterly intervals, and changes in outcomes coincident with the policies were estimated using interrupted time series analysis. In the first of three papers, we examine breastfeeding initiation and continuation. As these key outcomes are not readily available in administrative datasets, we developed a text-search algorithm to determine feeding practice during infants' first 90 days from automated medical records. We found that despite large, expected shifts in the percentage of mother-infant pairs having shorter stays, there were no changes due to either policy in the gradual upward trend in breastfeeding initiation or the constant rate of continuation among initiators. The second paper describes post-discharge newborn service utilization, plus financial impacts on the HMO. Program-related home visits contributed to an increase of about 260% in the proportion of newborns receiving any clinical evaluation on Day 3 or 4. The corresponding relative drop after the law was 18% ? less substantial, because home visits were guaranteed for stays <48 hours. Many experts consider follow-up on Day 3 or 4 more crucial than discharge timing. Routine health center visits increased with program implementation, but there were no significant changes in adverse events such as emergency room visits or rehospitalizations. Neither policy altered total HMO payments for hospitalizations and home care by more than $100 per delivery. The impact on HMO expenditures was surprisingly small, because of hospital price changes in apparent response to the HMO program. Our final paper describes increases in various measures of newborn jaundice and feeding difficulties at the start of the HMO program. We conclude that the elevated measures are not attributable to earlier discharge, because they continued during the post-mandate period. Ascertainment bias best explains these findings, and is likely due to increases in follow-up care.


 
Edmond Toy
2002, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Associate
Current Employer: Analysis Group
Thesis Title: The Environmental and Safety Risks of Sport-Utility Vehicles, Vans, and Pickup Trucks
Committee Members: Graham, Hammitt, Levy, Stavins
ABSTRACT: The composition of the passenger vehicle fleet in the US has been undergoing a major change. Sport-utility vehicles, vans, and pickup trucks, collectively known as light-duty trucks (LDTs), have become very popular. Whereas LDT sales comprised one-fifth of the market in 1975, they now account for about half. Concern has grown that this trend may have adverse impacts on public health. This thesis presents three studies that examine the environmental and safety implications of cars and LDTs. The first study compares the environmental damages from passenger vehicles. It analyzes air pollutant emissions from model year 2001 cars, small/medium-sized LDTs, and large LDTs. Emissions from gasoline production and vehicle use are estimated. The damages considered include health effects associated with particulate matter and ozone and the impacts of greenhouse gas emissions. These damages are valued in economic terms. Cars are associated with damages totaling $2,600; small/medium LDTs and large LDTs cause about one-third and three-quarters more damage, respectively. The second study examines the traffic safety risks in two-vehicle crashes involving cars and/or LDTs. Logistic regression methods and real-world crash data from the Crashworthiness Data System are used to compare the crashworthiness (self-protection) and aggressivity (risk to others) of cars, SUVs, vans, and pickups. A unique feature of the study is that it controls for the joint effects of vehicle mass and crash severity. Compared to cars, pickups provide greater crashworthiness but are more aggressive; effects associated with SUVs and vans were less pronounced. Vehicle characteristics besides mass have an important influence on safety risks. The third study characterizes trends in the distribution of vehicle mass among the on-road fleet of cars and LDTs. Large disparities in vehicle mass appear to increase net safety risks in two-vehicle crashes. Publicly available data are used to develop a simple model of the passenger vehicle fleet from 1975 to 2001. The variance in mass declined substantially from 1975 to 1996, possibly due to the effects of fuel economy standards. Since 1996, however, variance has increased and is likely to continue an upward trend; this is likely due to the growth in popularity of LDTs.


 
Sally Araki Aalfs
2003, Decision Sciences
Current Position: formerly Interdisciplinary Women's Health Research Scholar and Research Associate
Current Employer: Department of Medicine and Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University
Thesis Title: Shared Decision Making in the Treatment of Endometriosis Pain
Committee Members: Kuntz, Llewellyn-Thomas, Tosteson, Weinstein
ABSTRACT: Endometriosis is a benign gynecologic disorder that can cause potentially debilitating pain in women of reproductive age. Clinical evidence does not point to a single best treatment, and treatment options involve tradeoffs between benefits and harms that are associated with a wide range of personal values and quality of life implications. Thus, it is important that physicians provide patients with evidence-based information and that patients be able to participate in the value-laden choice of treatment for endometriosis pain. We conducted two complementary studies -- a patient study and a physician study -- to examine several aspects of the shared decision-making framework in the context of the treatment decision for endometriosis pain. Through patient interviews (n = 70), we investigated two approaches to patient preference assessment (decision analysis and balancing technique), specifically for the purpose of fostering effective decision support. We found that both assessment techniques were valid and acceptable to patients, but they generated highly discordant treatment recommendations. Patients were evenly divided in their preference for assessment technique, with the majority preferring the second technique presented. We also conducted a national mailed survey of gynecologists (n = 360) to examine physicians' treatment recommendations for endometriosis pain and their current practices and opinions regarding shared decision-making concepts. We found general consensus in physicians' importance ratings of key factors considered in decision making and similarities in their usual approaches to communicating with patients. However, there were substantial variations in treatment recommendations and evidence of physician-related effects. In addition, we found widespread physician endorsement of the notion of a patient decision aid for endometriosis pain. Finally, we conducted comparative analyses of patients' and physicians' attitudes and preferences, based on the observations from the two studies. Although patients and physicians generally concurred in their attitudes toward patient-physician roles and the importance of key factors in decision making, overall treatment preferences varied considerably. The dual-perspective results not only reinforce the need for effective decision support in the treatment decision for endometriosis pain, but also highlight key issues confronting researchers who seek to develop, test, and implement a new patient decision aid for women with endometriosis.


 
Elena Elkin
2003, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Assistant Outcomes Research Scientist, Health Outcomes Group; and Adjunct Assistant Professor
Current Employer: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; and NYU Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
Thesis Title: Decision Analysis in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer Treatment
Committee Members: Kuntz, Weeks, Weinstein
ABSTRACT: Advances in breast cancer treatment have improved the prognosis of many women with this disease. Whether a patient faces a diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer or more advanced disease, she and her doctor must choose a course treatment, weighing the benefits of each therapy against possible adverse effects. Similarly, policy makers must consider the benefits and harms of treatment alternatives, as well as their costs to society. Decision analysis is a method for systematically weighing all of these considerations, in order to identify an optimal treatment strategy. In Chapter 1 decision analysis is used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of strategies for selecting metastatic breast cancer patients for trastuzumab treatment. In this situation, there is fundamental tradeoff between test cost and test accuracy - a more accurate test has a greater cost per patient. We found that use of the more accurate test is optimal in the long run, since this test minimizes the number of false positive results and their associated treatment costs. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of considering test cost and outcomes in assessing the cost-effectiveness of a targeted therapy. In Chapter 2 decision analysis is used to examine the tradeoff between the efficacy and side effects of adjuvant therapy for early-stage breast cancer. We compared multi-agent chemotherapy with ovarian suppression in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive disease. We found that small relative differences in treatment efficacy had a substantial impact on outcome, regardless of treatment side effects. When treatments were equally efficacious, assumptions about menopause and quality of life affected the choice of therapy. Chapter 3 involves the calibration of a decision-analytic adjuvant treatment model with population-based breast cancer survival estimates. We compared survival projected by the model with survival estimates from national cancer registry data, and identified a set of parameter values that provided the best fit between model projections and registry-based estimates. We found that breast cancer recurrence estimates suggested by calibration with population-based data differed from those found in clinical trials and those used in prior decision models. This analysis provides a framework for calibrating decision-analytic models with disease outcomes in the population, in order to improve the applicability of such models.


 
Federico Girosi
2003, Economics
Current Position: Senior Policy Researcher
Current Employer: RAND Corporation
Thesis Title: Demographic Forecasting
Committee Members: King, Newhouse, Swartz
ABSTRACT: A number of important public policy decisions rest heavily on the ability to forecast certain cross-sectional time series. In this thesis we consider the task of forecasting time series of all causes and cause specific mortality for individual countries, genders and age groups. Time series of this type are relevant for the design of pension and health benefits, as well as for the prioritization and planning of health interventions. We argue that standard time series methods, by focusing exclusively on the observed values of the time series, fail to take advantage of a huge amount of available, additional information. This information comes under the form of time series of known determinants of mortality, and of experts' prior knowledge. We set the problem of forecasting mortality in the framework of cross-sectional time series with covariates, and adopt a hierarchical Bayesian point of view. We show how prior knowledge on the expected value of the dependent variable, of the type epidemiological experts have, can easily be translated into a prior density for the set of cross-sectional regression coefficients, allowing cross-sections to borrow strength from each other. We consider in details the case in which experts know, a priori, that the expected value of the dependent variable (or its time trend) varies smoothly across age groups, countries and time. While we focus on mortality, the method we developed can be applied to any cross-sectional time series for which the expected value of the dependent variable is known to vary smoothly across cross-sections. In particular, we offer a solution to the problem of pooling time series with different covariates in different cross-sections. We report results obtained applying our method to worldwide cause specific data obtained from the World Health Organization, and report very encouraging comparisons with the state of the art method of Lee and Carter (1992).


 
Fumie Yokota Griego
2003, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Health Economist / Decision Scientist
Current Employer: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President
Thesis Title: Improving Value of Information Analysis in Health Risk Management
Committee Members: Hammitt, Cutler, Gray, Thompson
ABSTRACT: Value of information (VOI) analysis is a decision analytic approach for evaluating the benefit of collecting additional information to reduce or eliminate uncertainty in a specific decision making context. Though experts have encouraged the use of a VOI approach in framing complex decision-making problems where uncertainties are large and stakes are high, formal VOI analysis do not yet play a major role in regulatory decision-making. Section 1 of the thesis explores the evolution of the VOI methods in health risk management through a comprehensive content analysis of VOI applications in the peer reviewed health literature. Chapter 1 shows the evolution of the methodology and advances in computing tools that allow analysis of problems with greater complexity. The analysis shows a lack of standardization of reporting methods and results, and little cross-fertilization across topic areas. Chapter 2 narrows the focus to applications in environmental health risk management (EHRM) and provides risk analysts and decision scientists with some guidance on how to structure and solve VOI problems related to EHRM decisions. Section 2 applies the VOI framework to a tiered toxicological testing program and explores the question: How much should uncertainty about risk be reduced before action is taken? Chapter 3 examines the optimal testing strategy from the perspective of a net benefits maximizing decision maker who is able to regulate chemical exposures based on predictions of carcinogenicity from lower tier tests. The analysis shows that both the level of expected human exposure and economic considerations such as control costs for reducing exposure are critical in the decision to pursue further testing, and that for a wide rage of exposures and costs, testing is not optimal. Furthermore, for a set of plausible exposure and control costs, it is optimal to regulate without further testing. Chapter 4 explores the optimal testing strategy of a constrained decision maker who, absent applicable human data, cannot regulate without bioassay data on a specific chemical. The analysis shows that delaying action until all tests results are available can lead to substantially lower societal net benefits for a large range of environmental exposures.


 
Minah Kim
2003, Political Analysis
Current Position: Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration
Current Employer: College of Social Science, Ewha Women's University (South Korea)
Thesis Title: Consumer’s Values on Health Care Services
Committee Members: Blendon, Cleary, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT: This thesis includes three studies on consumers' values on health care services. The first study compares Americans' attitudes on medical technology with those of people in thirteen other industrialized countries and show that Americans, particularly elderly Americans, are more interested than others in new medical discoveries and consider themselves well informed about those issues. These findings suggest that the American public will offer greater resistance than people in other countries to policies that restrain expenditures on new medical technology. This poses a particular problem for policy makers trying to slow the growth of future health care, especially Medicare expenditures. In the second paper, to ensure a fair comarison of health plan performance evaluated by patients, I developed and tested case-mix models for pediatric Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey (CAHPS) that adjust for differences in the types of patients treated by different plans when comparing plans' average CAHPS scores. This study had three objectives: 1) identify child and parent variables that should be adjusted for when comparing health plans using child CAHPS data, 2) examine whether different case-mix models are necessary for Medicaid and commercially insured children, and 3) examine whether the coefficients of these variables are homogeneous across plans. In the third study, I examined Medicaid enrollees' assessments of their own and their children's care compared to those of commercial insurance enrollees, using the CAHPS. I compared adjusted means of plan ratings and reports by commercially insured and Medicaid patients. The Medicaid global ratings were higher or at least similar to commercial ratings. However, Medicaid adults and children reported worse experiences than the commercially insured. In regression analyses, patient reports of experience explained more of the variation of global ratings than plan-effects or patient characteristics. Among the five composites of patient experience measures, 'communication with doctors' was the strongest predictor of the global ratings for overall care and of doctor and specialist ratings.


 
Kristina Hanson Lowell
2003, Political Analysis
Current Position: Senior Research Scientist
Current Employer: NORC at the University of Chicago
Thesis Title: Political Determinants of Health Policy: The Roles of Public Opinion and Private Interests
Committee Members: Blendon, Cutler, Frank
ABSTRACT: The political environment is a key factor in efforts to sustain and reform public programs serving low-income and elderly populations. These papers assess the political determinants of policy-making in the health-care arena by analyzing two potential sources of influence: public opinion and campaign contributions from interest groups and other stakeholders. The first paper examines public attitudes toward Medicaid and welfare in the context of the 1995-1996 block-grant debates and concludes that Medicaid enjoys broader public support than does the welfare program. The data demonstrate that Medicaid’s role for the elderly and disabled and the absence of negative stereotypes about both the program’s incentives and the population it serves are key to its relative popularity. In addition, in contrast to much of the existing literature, the data analyzed here suggest that negative attitudes toward racial minorities do not affect public support for the welfare program. The second paper analyzes the relative roles of personal ideology and self-interest in individuals’ health-policy preferences. The data suggest that ideology is a much stronger predictor than self-interest of perceptions of the leading health-policy challenges facing the country and how they should be addressed. In addition, ideology appears to play less of a role in the context of Medicare reform than with respect to the problem of the uninsured. The third paper provides an overview of campaign contributions from the health-care sector over the period spanning 1989-2002, along with a more in-depth analysis of contributions from the pharmaceutical industry during the ongoing Medicare prescription drug coverage debate. The data suggest that drug companies increase their contributions dramatically when threatened by potential legislative changes. In addition, although industry donors appear to allocate their contributions strategically—targeting generally sympathetic candidates and Members of Congress on Committees with jurisdiction over the Medicare program—these patterns do not shift along with the level of overall contributions as a function of the policy agenda.


 
Shanna Shulman
2003, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Director of Policy and Research
Current Employer: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation
Thesis Title: Evaluating Infant Experience Under Medicaid Managed Care
Committee Members: Swartz, Frank, Meara
ABSTRACT: Over the past decade, there has been a tremendous shift of the Medicaid population into managed care, from less than 10% participating in 1990 to nearly 60% in 2001. This transition has been particularly true for infants who have been primary targets for early inclusion in state managed care experiments. Of the 35% of infants who now qualify for Medicaid services for the duration of their first year, more than half are eligible to participate under a managed care form. These three papers concern infant utilization and retention under Medicaid managed care. I conducted my analyses using Florida Medicaid enrollment and claims files from 1994 to 1999, relying on logistic and linear multi-variate regression methods. During that time, Florida offered two Medicaid managed care options: Primary Care Case Management (PCCM) and Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO). In my first paper, I found that the shift of infant populations into managed care accomplished many of the access to care goals, if not the cost-savings goals states hoped to achieve. I also found that HMO enrollees and high volume users had higher relative odds of remaining enrolled in Medicaid. In my second paper, I found that part of the process of enrolling infants into managed care programs may delay their receipt of preventive care. Regardless of whether infants chose or were assigned to a managed care provider, the length of time to provider designation was negatively associated with achievement of preventive care goals. In my third paper, I found that low birth weight infants were less likely to achieve preventive care goals during their first year and to remain on the Medicaid program after their first year as compared to infants of normal birth weight. Much of this deficit appears due to relatively poor health promotion among mothers of low birth weight infants. In sum, I found that managed care may be a positive innovation for infants enrolled in Medicaid, but that careful consideration should be given to the feasibility of cost savings, to program implementation, and to tracking vulnerable populations, such as low birth weight infants, within the system.


 
Colleen Barry
2004, Political Analysis
Current Position: Associate Professor
Current Employer: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Thesis Title: The Political Economy of Mental Health Parity
Committee Members: Frank, Blendon, Huskamp, McGuire
ABSTRACT: This thesis examines behavioral responses to parity regulation from the perspectives of the health plan, the consumer, and politicians and interest groups. Parity regulations aim to eliminate differences in insurance for mental health treatment compared with other medical services. The emergence of managed care over the last decade has created supply-side rationing mechanisms that may weaken the ability of parity policies to curb responses to selection incentives. Paper 1 examines health plan response to a comprehensive mental health and substance abuse parity directive for federal employees. Results show that plans complied with the policy and did not exit the federal employee program due to parity as had been feared by some policymakers. However, in comparison with unaffected health plans, federal employee plans were significantly more likely to contract with managed behavioral health carve-out firms after parity. Paper 2 studies the effect of state parity laws on consumer utilization of outpatient mental health services and out-of-pocket price. Structural shift estimates calculated from a three equation demand model predict a 30 percent increase in expected visits due to parity. However, using data from a subsequent time period, these differences are no longer detected even when the most comprehensive laws are compared to non-parity states. Parity laws do not appear to affect the price paid by consumers for outpatient specialty mental health services. Paper 3 studies how strategic political actors have used data, symbolic devices, and narrative-based emotional appeals to frame the terms of the debate over mental health parity in the U.S. Congress and state legislatures. Both supporters and opponents of parity have attempted to influence perceptions about the effectiveness and cost of treating mental disorders, and the mental health community has also used personal narrative to overcome their disadvantage in more traditional advocacy resources. Salient policy images have been particularly influential given low public attention and the limited role of partisan affiliation and political ideology in the parity debate.


 
Janice Cooper
2004, Ethics
Current Position: Interim Director
Current Employer: National Center for Children in Poverty, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
Thesis Title: Treatment for Children with Attention Deficit-Hyperactivity Disorder
Committee Members: Rosenthal, Brandt, Frank
ABSTRACT: Treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) among children commands our attention because the disorder is the most commonly diagnosed and because its treatment continues to stir controversy. This study examines treatment patterns for children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder using cross-sectional and trend analyses. It explores the policy dilemmas decision makers face when they craft mental health policy for children with ADHD. Chapter 1 examines treatment patterns for children and adolescents with a diagnosis of ADHD enrolled in the Florida Medicaid program during FY 1996-1997. The study establishes the relationship between provider and personal attributes and treatment modality. It also focuses on appropriate treatment. Findings show that most children received sub-optimal care. Results of this analysis show disproportionate rates of access, based on race, to evidence-based care: stimulant only therapy and combination therapy. Provider type determined treatment option selection and whether care was appropriate as measured by whether a child received an assessment or family treatment. Chapter 2 describes a case study of the Ritalin Relief Act, a law designed to reduce the use of stimulants to treat attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. It provides insight into the legislative process in Minnesota; analyzes the socio-cultural context of anti-Ritalin legislation that fostered its political legitimacy and appeal; and, tests normative assumptions on political deliberation. It assesses whether the legislative process in this case adhered to the tenets of deliberative democracy. Chapter 3 explores treatment patterns of children with ADHD enrolled in the Florida Medicaid program in FY 1996-2000. Findings show that most children received sub-optimal care. Nonetheless, small but significant improvements in concordance with treatment guidelines occurred over the period examined. Similar improvements in the rates of assessment and family treatment were not found except for small sub-groups. Racial disparities in receipt of appropriate treatment diminished over time in some cases. Finally, long-acting stimulants, which were introduced to the market in the last year of the study diffused rapidly among the study population. White children were most likely to receive the long-acting stimulants compared to African-Americans, while Latinos were least likely to get these newer drugs.


 
Juliette Cubanski
2004, Political Analysis
Current Position: Principal Policy Analyst, Mediare Policy Project
Current Employer: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
Thesis Title: Three Studies on Policies to Reduce Medicare Drug Spending
Committee Members: Frank, Blendon, Epstein, Swartz
ABSTRACT: This thesis consists of three related studies on policies to reduce prescription drug spending by Medicare beneficiaries. The policy context is the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA). The first study, "Savings from Drug Discount Cards: Relief for Medicare Beneficiaries?" estimates savings for Medicare beneficiaries without drug coverage from prescription drug discount card programs. I estimate modest average savings from existing programs of 17.4 percent over current retail prices. Savings through the federally-approved Medicare discount card program will depend on beneficiaries' out-of-pocket drug spending, the number and types of drugs used, and specific card program features. Aggregate savings estimates vary widely, based on uncertainty in discounts and program participation rates. The second study, "Antihypertensive Prescription Drug Use by Medicare Beneficiaries: What Factors Relate to Demand for Generics?" evaluates demand for antihypertensive generic drugs by Medicare beneficiaries. Increasing use of generic drugs could restrain growth in drug spending, because generics are generally cheaper than brand-name drugs. This could be particularly helpful for Medicare beneficiaries who currently lack insurance coverage for prescription drugs and pay full retail price. Using Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data from 2000, I examine whether beneficiaries' demand for generic antihypertensive drugs is related to variation in coverage for supplemental medical insurance and outpatient prescription drugs, usual source of medical care, income, health status measures, and state laws that require substituting generic drugs for brand-name equivalents. Results show that the design of insurance arrangements and the care-giving environment are important factors in beneficiaries' demand for generic antihypertensive drugs. The third study, "When Policy and Press Collide: Analyzing Media Coverage of the Medicare Prescription Drug Discount Card Program," analyzes the content of print media to systematically assess how four influential newspapers covered the development and implementation of the Medicare discount card program from July 2003 to June 2004. The tone of coverage-positive, negative, or neutral-has practical and political implications for beneficiaries, industry groups, government officials, policymakers, and ultimately, the program itself. The analysis indicates that media coverage of the discount card program has conveyed an increasingly critical tone since enactment of the MMA.


 
Julie Donohue
2004, Political Analysis
Current Position: Assistant Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management
Current Employer: Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh
Thesis Title: Pharmaceutical Promotion in an Age of Consumerism
Committee Members: Frank, Blendon, Brandt, Rosenthal
ABSTRACT: This thesis examines the effects of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) and traces the evolution of pharmaceutical promotion and its regulation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) throughout the 20th century. The thesis sheds light on the role of consumers in medical decision-making, and consumerism in affecting public policy in health care. The first chapter examines the impact of pharmaceutical promotion to consumers and physicians on public health. Specifically, it assesses the effect of promotion of antidepressants on (1) the likelihood that someone diagnosed with a new episode of depression received medication, and (2) whether antidepressant medication was provided for the appropriate duration. We assessed the association between variation in spending on pharmaceutical promotion for antidepressants and patterns in the treatment of depression. DTCA was associated with an increase in the number of people with depression who initiated medication therapy and a small increase in the number of individuals treated with antidepressants who received the appropriate duration of therapy. Promotion to physicians was not associated with either the initiation of treatment with an antidepressant or with the duration of therapy. The second chapter examines the impact of pharmaceutical promotion on medication choice in the antidepressant market. We assessed the association between variation in spending on pharmaceutical promotion for antidepressants and choice of antidepressant observed at the individual level. We found no effect of DTCA on drug choice, except for individuals diagnosed with anxiety disorders who were slightly more likely to fill prescriptions for advertised drugs. Pharmaceutical company spending on detailing to physicians was positively and significantly associated with an increase in a drug's choice probability even after controlling for other factors likely to affect medication selection. The third chapter traces DTCA through three periods of consumer involvement in health care. Consumer-directed pharmaceutical promotion dominated the first period of self-medication when most medicines were available without prescription. During the second period of patient dependence and physician autonomy, pharmaceutical promotion was exclusively focused on physicians. The trend toward greater consumer involvement in the third period of consumer empowerment is related to recent changes in pharmaceutical marketing strategies and FDA regulation of drug advertising.


 
Laura Eselius
2004, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Senior Manager, Life Sciences and Health Care Initiatives
Current Employer: Deloitte Research and the Center for Health Solutions, Deloitte Services, LP
Thesis Title: Assessing the Quality of Behavioral Health Care and Health Plans Using Consumer Reports and Ratings
Committee Members: Cleary, Huskamp, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT: Interest in comparing consumer assessments of quality across health plans has grown. The Experience of Care and Health Outcomes (ECHO™) survey, a CAHPS® instrument, facilitates the standardized collection of consumers' evaluations of their behavioral health care and the plan that manages that care. The usefulness and fairness of plan comparisons based on these assessments depends on the extent to which summary measures are reliable (Paper 1), plan differences in casemix are taken into account (Paper 2), and group differences reflect quality differences versus reporting biases (Paper 3). Factor analysis of data from 4,068 enrollees in 21 plans suggested four composites for summarizing consumers' reports about 22 specific experiences. Similar factor structures appeared for commercial and Medicaid respondents. Compared to the factor-based measures, four composites defined a priori by combining conceptually related items with the same response scale exhibited better or similar internal consistency and plan-level reliability. The a priori composites Timely Access to Care, Patient-Provider Interaction, Treatment Information, and Plan Approval and Service were recommended for reporting along with overall ratings. A casemix adjustment model was developed by identifying consumer characteristics that were strongly related to assessments and varied significantly among plans. Mental health, general health, alcohol/drug use, age, education, and race/ethnicity were selected. Income was important in the commercial sample, and gender was important in the Medicaid sample. The impact of adjustment on plan scores was modest, but substantial enough to change plan rankings. Group differences in reports and ratings may arise because certain types of consumers tend to experience better or worse quality of care or give more or less favorable evaluations compared to others. Multivariate linear regression was used to analyze the relationships between consumer characteristics, reports, and ratings. Adjusting for reports about experiences reduced the effects of health status, and to a smaller degree education and age, on rating scores. If reports are less subjective than ratings, these findings suggest group differences in ratings may reflect differences in experiences more than reporting biases. Plan-by-health-status interactions were significant in models predicting ratings and reports, indicating differences between consumers in better and worse health were greater in some plans than others.


 
Julia Aledort Gaebler
2004, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Assistant Adjunct Professor; Adjunct Policy Researcher; Director, Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Current Employer: UCSD School of Medicine; RAND Corporation; Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Thesis Title: Infectious Disease Policy in the Era of Antibiotic Drug Resistance: Decision Analytic and Historical Perspectives
Committee Members: Weinstein, Brandt, Goldie, Murray
ABSTRACT: In the United States and abroad, infectious diseases constitute a significant public health problem. Costly new disease detection methods, increasingly constrained healthcare budgets, and unchecked disease among certain hard-to-reach populations frequently dictate changes in prevention policies. Moreover, the specter of antimicrobial resistance poses serious challenges to traditional assumptions about treatment efficacy. Applying both quantitative and qualitative methods, this thesis explores current issues related to screening and treatment of infectious diseases in an era of antibiotic resistance. Chapter One uses decision analytic methods to contribute new insights into screening strategies for gonorrhea which have become increasingly important in light of the treatment challenges posed by antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. A decision analytic model was developed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of screening for gonorrhea with cheaper testing strategies associated with significant loss to follow-up compared to newer, more expensive strategies that provide immediate results in young women seeking care in inner city emergency departments (EDs) where disease prevalence is high. Our results suggest that inner city ED settings offer high-yield, cost-effective screening opportunities for detecting and treating gonococcal infections, and that rapid testing technologies offer value that justifies their higher cost. Chapter Two addresses the problem of resistance to standard antibiotic treatment of gonorrhea in the Philippines, where the spread of quinolone-resistant N. gonorrhoeae through commercial sex workers poses an immediate threat to disease control, and limited healthcare resources prevent the use of effective cephalosporin antibiotics. We developed a deterministic, compartmental model of the transmission dynamics of drug-sensitive and drug-resistant gonorrhea to quantify the costs, health consequences, and cost-effectiveness associated with switching from quinolones to costly but effective cephalosporin antibiotics at different thresholds of quinolone resistance. We found that that preventing gonococcal resistance among high-risk sexual transmitters can effectively control the emergence of resistance in the general population. Chapter Three employs qualitative methods of historical research to examine the broader problem of antibiotic resistance in society. Drawing from primary sources including scientific and medical articles, reports from the popular press, and Congressional testimony from the early 1900s to the present, this paper traces the historical sociology of antibiotic resistance in the 20th century, focusing primarily on the positions and practices.


 
William Gnam
2004, Economics
Current Position: Scientist and Staff Psychiatrist
Current Employer: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto
Thesis Title: The Impact of Managed Behavioral Carve-Outs on Quality of Depression Care
Committee Members: Frank, Huskamp, Newhouse
ABSTRACT:


 
Patricia Keenan
2004, Political Analysis
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Health Policy, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health
Current Employer: Yale University School of Medicine
Thesis Title: Implications of Rising Medical Care Spending
Committee Members: Cutler, Blendon, Carpenter, Neumann, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: Personal health care spending accounts for a growing share of the economy and creates pressure on individual and government budgets. Rising spending creates policy challenges because the main driver of increases, medical technology, contributes to health improvements and attracts substantial public and political support. In three papers, this thesis focuses on implications of rising spending for quality of care and scope of insurance coverage. The first paper focuses on a potential way to improve quality, as rising spending creates pressure to get better value from spending, particularly as people are living longer with chronic diseases. Using panel survey data, I find that older adults who develop new health conditions are three times more likely to quit smoking, and have modest weight loss, relative to individuals without new conditions. People with new conditions account for half of observed quits and dampen an overall weight increase. New health conditions may be a teachable moment to promote health behavior change as secondary prevention through the health care system. The second paper focuses on Medicare regulatory decisions on coverage of new treatments, as rising spending also creates pressure on scope of benefits. I propose a bureaucratic decisionmaking framework where the agency acts to mediate tensions in underlying goals in the context of complex evidence and pluralistic stakeholder input. Using qualitative evidence from case studies and interviews, I find that decisions follow strong clinical evidence. When evidence is less certain, decisions for high cost treatments reflect greater scrutiny of evidence, while some decisions for salient diseases with limited treatment alternatives interpret uncertain evidence more broadly. The final paper assesses the role of rising costs in declines in coverage, recognizing that rising spending also creates pressure on availability of coverage. Using multiple data sets and econometric techniques, this paper shows that rising premiums account for over half of the decline in health insurance over the 1990s. Initiatives aimed at reducing the number of uninsured must confront the growing pressure on coverage rates generated by rising costs.


 
Douglas Levy
2004, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, and Assistant in Health Care Policy, Institute for Health Policy
Current Employer: Harvard Medical School, and Massachusetts General Hospital
Thesis Title: Investigating Policies to Reduce Tobacco Use and Harm: Findings and Methods
Committee Members: Newhouse, Kuntz, Meara, Normand, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT: This dissertation consists of three chapters, each a separate paper, that taken together examine policies aimed at reducing the prevalence of tobacco use in the United States as well as methodologies used in public health research. In the first paper, I used Monte Carlo simulations to analyze how adding coverage for smoking cessation interventions to a private health insurance plan would affect health expenditures within the plan and to determine whether insurers have internal incentives to offer smoking cessation benefits. I also examined how adding such a benefit would affect overall medical expenditures and Medicare expenditures for a cohort of enrollees to determine whether there are societal benefits associated with insurance coverage of smoking cessation interventions. I find that private insurers do not have internal incentives to offer smoking cessation benefits, but there are sufficient societal gains to warrant policies encouraging their provision. In the second paper, written with Ellen Meara, we analyzed the effect of the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) on maternal smoking and birth weight outcomes. The MSA resulted in an immediate 22% increase cigarette prices. Previous literature predicted such an increase would reduce maternal smoking by 10-20% and reduce low birth weight outcomes by 2-4%. Using birth certificate data and time-series analysis, we find only a 2.2% reduction in maternal smoking prevalence and a 1.8% reduction in low birth weight outcomes following the MSA, though there were larger effects for teenage mothers. We conclude that price changes may not be as promising a method for reducing maternal smoking as earlier predicted. The third paper is work done together with James O'Malley and Sharon-Lise Normand. We extended a published method for reducing bias in clinical trials where there are missing data and treatment non-compliance to include adjustment for continuous covariates. Monte Carlo simulation methods were used to compare the performance of our covariate-adjusted estimators to previously established estimators under a variety of circumstances. Our estimators had the smallest mean squared errors and the least bias under the broadest range of circumstances. We illustrated our methods using data from a clinical trial comparing antipsychotic drugs.


 
H. Thomas Stelfox
2004, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Assistant Professor, Critical Care Medicine and Community Health Sciences
Current Employer: University of Calgary
Thesis Title: Patient Safety and Errors of Omission
Committee Members: Soumerai, Bates, Newhouse, Redelmeier
ABSTRACT: This dissertation is composed of three separate studies that examined three different patient safety challenges. In the first paper, "The safety of patients isolated for infection control," a retrospective cohort study was undertaken to examine the quality of medical care received by patients isolated for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus at two large North American teaching hospitals. Two matched controls were selected for each isolated patient and we examined quality of care measures encompassing processes, outcomes, and satisfaction. We concluded that compared to controls, patients isolated for infection control reasons experience more preventable adverse events, express greater dissatisfaction with their treatment, and have less documented care. In the second paper, "Monitoring amiodarone's toxicities: recommendations, evidence and clinical practice," we developed an evidence-based model of outpatient medication monitoring and examined monitoring practices for one medication, amiodarone. Explicit monitoring criteria were derived from the literature and a cross sectional retrospective chart review of 99 outpatients receiving amiodarone therapy between January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2001 at a large tertiary care hospital was performed to assess adherence to monitoring recommendations. We found that only 9% of outpatients received the recommended monitoring and speculated that complex monitoring requirements made it difficult for all criteria to be simultaneously satisfied. In the third paper, "Patient ratings of physician performance: a guide to physician complaint and malpractice experiences," we examined whether it might be possible to use commonly distributed patient satisfaction surveys to identify physicians at high risk of complaints and malpractice lawsuits. Our cross-sectional study of 353 physicians at a large teaching hospital between January 1, 1983 and March 31, 2003 demonstrated that physician complaint and risk management experiences were inversely correlated with patient survey rating of physician performance. We concluded that commonly distributed satisfaction surveys might be useful tools for identifying physicians at high risk of patient complaints and malpractice litigation.


 
David G. Stevenson
2004, Ethics
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Health Policy, Department of Health Care Policy
Current Employer: Harvard Medical School
Thesis Title: The Consumer's Role in Nursing Home Quality
Committee Members: Swartz, Newhouse, Buchanan, Studdert
ABSTRACT: My thesis focuses on the consumer's role in nursing home quality. Using five years of data from Massachusetts Department of Public Health (1998-2002), the first chapter explores whether consumer complaints might be used to assess quality of care in nursing homes. Although complaints have been critical to nursing home oversight, the potential of complaints in quality assessment has been unexplored. I find that complaints vary across facilities in ways that are consistent with the nursing home quality literature and that they track well with other nursing home quality measures. I conclude that nursing home consumer complaints provide a supplemental tool with which to differentiate facilities on quality. The second chapter focuses on recent trends in nursing home litigation, which has emerged over the last decade to become one of the fastest growing areas of health care litigation. Using a web-based survey of attorneys who bring and defend this type of litigation nationwide, we explore the scale, dynamics, and outcomes of this litigation. Respondents and their firms were involved, respectively, in 4,677 and 8,256 claims in 2001, over half of which were in Florida and Texas. Data show that the costs of nursing home litigation are substantial on an aggregate and per-claim basis. These findings elevate concerns about nursing home quality and indicate that litigation may divert resources from resident care. The third chapter focuses on the potential of using publicly-reported quality information to inform consumers' nursing home placement decisions and to improve quality of care. Although there is an extensive reporting literature in the acute sector, this approach is relatively new in long-term care. Beyond identifying potential barriers to such efforts, I evaluate whether the quality information reported on the Nursing Home Compare website had any impact on nursing home occupancy rates following its release. I find that the effect of public reporting on nursing home occupancy rates has been minimal thus far. It is unclear whether the absence of a larger effect to date is specific to Nursing Home Compare, or whether it inheres to the broader task of using information to promote change in nursing home care.


 
Chapin White
2004, Economics
Current Position: Principal Analyst
Current Employer: Congressional Budget Office
Thesis Title: The New Medicare Prospective Payment System for Skilled Nursing Facilities: Impacts on Payments, Services and Quality of Care
Committee Members: Newhouse, Buchanan, Cutler
ABSTRACT: In 1998 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) began phasing in a new prospective payment system (PPS) for Medicare payments to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). In Chapter 1, I examine the effects of the new PPS on the level of rehabilitation therapy provided in SNFs. Among residents of freestanding SNFs, the fraction receiving extremely high levels of rehabilitation therapy dropped significantly, and the fraction receiving moderate levels of rehabilitation therapy increased. Freestanding SNFs, particularly for-profits, dramatically altered the services they provided in response to new financial incentives. This responsiveness underscores the importance of efforts currently underway to refine the SNF PPS. In Chapter 2, I measure SNF market entry and exit and days of care provided to assess the adequacy of Medicare payments under the new PPS. Following implementation of the PPS in 1998 there was substantial net exit by hospital-based SNFs, but net entry by freestanding SNFs. Among freestanding SNFs, for-profits were no more likely than non-profits to exit. Among hospital-based SNFs, for-profits and newly opened SNFs were most likely to exit. SNFs with a pharmaceutical-heavy casemix were more likely to exit. Payments to freestanding SNFs appear to be adequate, but payments may not be adequate for hospital-based SNFs. In Chapter 3, I examine two effects of the SNF PPS on payments: payment levels were changed (upward for most SNFs) and payments were no longer based on costs incurred. Using Medicare administrative data for all freestanding SNFs in the U.S., I measure facility-level changes in nurse staffing from 1997 (pre-PPS) to 2001 (post-PPS), and relate these staffing changes to payment changes. I find that the changes in payment levels are associated with positive but small changes in nurse staffing, whereas the elimination of cost reimbursement is associated with a large drop in nurse staffing. I also find that the elimination of cost reimbursement is associated with worsening of process-based quality of care measures, but I do not find associations between payment changes and outcome-based quality of care measures. I discuss alternative approaches to introducing elements of cost reimbursement into the existing SNF PPS.


 
Kara Zivin
2004, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Assistant Professor; Investigator
Current Employer: University of Michigan Department of Psychiatry; Department of Veterans Affairs National Seious Mental Illness Treatment Research and Evaluation Cente
Thesis Title: Effect of Depression on Diabetes and Cardiac Outcomes
Committee Members: McLaughlin, Soumerai, Swartz
ABSTRACT: This dissertation is comprised of three papers that explore the relationship between depression and medical disorders, specifically diabetes and heart disease. Each paper focuses on a different element of this relationship, namely diagnosis of depression (paper 3), treatment of depression (paper 2), and adherence to antidepressant treatment (paper 1) among patients with comorbid medical illness. In my first paper, I examined the effect of antidepressant adherence on glycemic control among diabetes patients. The analysis did not detect significant differences in HbA1c levels (a measure of glycemic control) over time among diabetes patients who were and were not adherent to antidepressant medication treatment. My second paper looked at the effect of a medical crisis counseling intervention on self-rated health among cardiac patients who were identified with symptoms of emotional distress. In this randomized controlled trial, intervention patients had significantly higher levels of self-rated health improvement compared to control patients at two months post-baseline. My final paper evaluated how well a depression and anxiety assessment tool predicted a major depression diagnosis among cardiac patients. This analysis found that an assessment tool was highly sensitive but not very specific at a predetermined cutoff level for detecting major depression. It also found that a few items on the assessment tool could reasonably predict depression diagnosis almost as well as the entire assessment measure.


 
Colin S. Baker
2005, Economics
Current Position: Health Scientist Administrator
Current Employer: National Institute on Aging
Thesis Title: Labor Markets, Health, and Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance
Committee Members: Frank, Cutler, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: Three questions are examined. The first concerns the effect of minimum wage hikes on employer-sponsored health insurance. Low-skilled workers have limited access to health benefits, and a binding minimum wage can make it impossible for firms to offer coverage. I use changes in the level and bindingness of minimum wage laws during 1987-1999 to identify effects on the proportion of full-time adult workers with health insurance. An increase in the minimum wage of $1.80—the amount of the federal increase during this period—is expected to reduce coverage by about two percentage points, or nearly half the amount by which coverage fell during this time for full-time workers. Lower-wage environments see larger reductions for a given increase. Also examined is the effect of poor health on work following involuntary job loss. Older workers who lose their jobs are known to experience long absences from full-time work. Since poor health also reduces work, employment after job loss among the sick is of particular interest. Examining panel data from the Health & Retirement Study (HRS), I find that older persons with major health problems return to work at a substantially lower rate than do their healthier counterparts. While poor health is known to reduce labor force participation, little is known about the exact reasons. To explore the possibility that health events may reduce work by impacting mental health, this analysis uses data from the HRS to examine the relationship between onset of illness and reported mental health status among older persons. Reported health events such as cardiovascular disease or stroke have large apparent negative effects on reported mental health measures, though endogeneity concerns should be noted.


 
Niteesh Choudhry
2005, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Medicine, and Associate Physician
Current Employer: Harvard Medical School, and Brigham and Women's Hospital
Thesis Title: The Impact of Physician Factors on Health Care Quality
Committee Members: Soumerai, Normand, Ross-Degnan
ABSTRACT: Health care of suboptimal quality has been reported for many medical conditions. Physician factors, such as practice style and expertise, may explain variations in quality. This dissertation empirically evaluates three such factors. My first paper examines the relationship between length of time in clinical practice and health care quality. Physicians who have been in practice for longer are believed to have accumulated knowledge and skills over time. However, medical advances occur frequently and the explicit knowledge that physicians possess may become out of date. By systematically reviewing the published literature, I demonstrate that more experienced physicians have less factual knowledge and may be at risk for providing lower-quality care. I conclude that this subgroup of physicians may be in particular need for quality improvement interventions. My second paper evaluates the influence of physician specialty on the quality of care for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and elevates a patient’s risk of stroke. This risk is most effectively reduced using warfarin, but warfarin is received by only 30-60% of appropriate patients. In order to assess the influence of physician, patient and hospital characteristics on warfarin use, I used a population-based cohort of 140,185 elderly patients with AF. I demonstrate that after controlling for clinical factors, patients cared for by non-cardiologist physicians with cardiology consultation were more likely to receive warfarin then patients treated in non-consultative environments. I conclude that preferred models of AF care should involve routine collaboration between cardiologists and other physicians. My final paper assesses the influence of physicians’ experiences with adverse events on the quality of care they provide. In the case of AF, warfarin elevates a patient’s risk of bleeding; however, for many patients the benefits of therapy outweigh their risks. Nevertheless, physicians’ experiences with significant warfarin-associated adverse events may lead to warfarin under-use. Using a matched-pair analysis, I demonstrate that after a physician has had a patient suffer a warfarin-associated hemorrhage, they are less likely to prescribe warfarin to subsequent appropriate patients. This finding highlights the need for strategies to modify physicians’ perceptions of the risks associated with anticoagulation.


 
Jane K. Kim
2005, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Health Decision Science
Current Employer: Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health
Thesis Title: Using Mathematical Modeling to Evaluate the Public Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies in Different World Regions
Committee Members: Goldie, Salomon, Weinstein
ABSTRACT: Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Triage Strategies for Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance in the United States [Paper 1] Each year, more than 2 million U.S. women are diagnosed with an equivocal Pap smear result known as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS). To inform the development of national guidelines for the optimal management of ASCUS, we conducted a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis comparing different strategies for the management of ASCUS. After the completion of our long-term analysis, primary data from the ASCUS/LSIL Triage Study (ALTS), a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, became available. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of the clinical trial arms over the time horizon of the trial (i.e., 2 years), using a payer perspective. These two distinct analyses are presented as Part I and Part II of this paper. Using computer-based decision-analytic models, we compared three triage strategies: (1) immediate colposcopy, (2) DNA testing for human papillomavirus (HPV), the virus known to cause cervical cancer, and (3) repeat Pap smears at 6 and 12 months. In both analyses, we found that in the context of current cervical cancer screening, HPV DNA testing for the management of women with ASCUS provides the same or greater clinical benefits as other management options, but is less costly. Despite different input data, model structures, time horizons, and perspectives, the results of our analyses in Part I and Part II of this paper support similar conclusions about the attractiveness of HPV DNA testing as a triage strategy for ASCUS. The results of our policy analysis were used in the 2002 American Cancer Society guidelines and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology national guidelines for cervical cancer screening. Optimal Single-Visit Package of Health Services for Women in Developing Countries [Paper 2] A public health priority is the provision of primary care services for older women in resource-poor settings. Motivated by the momentum of the impending widespread introduction of single lifetime cervical cancer screening in developing countries, we sought to identify interventions that could be included in a package of health services targeted to women of post-reproductive age. We developed an integer programming (IP) model to maximize disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted from health interventions, subject to budget and human resource constraints in four resource-poor regions. In addition to cervical cancer, interventions for six other diseases were considered: breast cancer, colorectal cancer, cardiovascular disease, depression, iron deficiency, and two bacterial sexually-transmitted diseases (STD). For each disease we considered two types of interventions – a low intensity and high intensity option – of which only one could be chosen to be in the package of services. Inputs to the IP model were calculated using Markov models, which estimated DALYs averted and costs per woman for each intervention. Human resource constraints were expressed as limits to available staff-time, distinguishing between lower-level and higher-level personnel to reflect different education and training requirements. Our results show that the addition of other health interventions during a one-time cervical cancer screen can lead to substantial health gains, and that in the absence of any additional constraints aside from the budget, interventions for the seven conditions were affordable. As we introduced different levels and types of personnel constraints, the components of the package differed. For example, when we constrained both lower- and higher-level personnel time, we found that interventions for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, anemia, and STD were excluded from the package; when we constrained only higher-level personnel time, the contents of the package shifted towards adoption of the less intensive interventions. There appear to be advantages to enriching traditional cost-effectiveness analyses with other methods of operations research that allow for consideration of more than just a budget constraint. This analysis demonstrates that future analyses used to inform resource allocation decisions, particularly in low-resource settings, would be enhanced by the inclusion of non-monetary constraints. Calibration of a Natural History Model of Cervical Cancer [Paper 3] Our previously developed deterministic model has been used to assess the cost-effectiveness of several national guidelines for cervical cancer screening in the U.S., Europe and Hong Kong. To evaluate more complex screening strategies that tailor to the risk-profile and history of an individual woman, we developed a first-order Monte Carlo simulation model that incorporates increased knowledge on the natural history of HPV infection and improved screening techniques, such as HPV DNA testing. We parameterized the model employing a two-step calibration approach. In the first step of calibration, we capitalized on the availability of primary data from a longitudinal study, and exploring parameters individually, identified a plausible range for each parameter that produced model output that fell within the 95% confidence intervals of the empirical data. In the second step, we included data from the literature to establish 32 calibration targets and ranges. Through multiple simulations, we conducted a comprehensive search over 14 input parameters simultaneously using insights from the first calibration step, to identify parameter sets that produced output that fit with both the primary and secondary data. We scored 140,000 uniquely sampled parameter sets according to the number of times the model output fell outside target ranges, and used a sample of the best fitting sets to project a range of benefits and cost-effectiveness of different screening policies. Because there is no standard criterion for determining acceptable model fit, we then explored the policy implications associated with different fit criteria. Finally, in order to evaluate the impact of the calibration exercises, outcomes were compared to those projected by the model using the initial parameter values prior to calibration.


 
Amy Bird Knudsen
2005, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Senior Scientist, Institute for Technology Assessment (MGH); Instructor in Radiology (HMS)
Current Employer: Massachusetts General Hospital; Harvard Medical School
Thesis Title: Explaining the Secular Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality with an Empirically Calibrated Microsimulation Model
Committee Members: Kuntz, Weeks, Weinstein
ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. The incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer have changed over time. Prior to 1985, incidence was relatively flat at 86 to 90 cases per 100,000. Since 1985, the incidence rate has been on a general decline, falling steadily from 90 cases per 100,000 in 1985 to 69 cases per 100,000 in 1995. Incidence increased slightly during the late 1990s but has been falling steadily since then to a rate of 65 cases per 100,000 in 2001. Colorectal cancer mortality has been falling by approximately 1.5% per year for the past thirty years to a rate of 31 deaths per 100,000 in 2001. Several factors may have contributed to the observed trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, including secular trends in the risk factors for the disease, the dissemination of colorectal cancer screening, and changes in the patterns of care for diagnosed cancer. What is the relative contribution of each of these factors in explaining the incidence and mortality trends? To address this question, we developed a comprehensive population-based microsimulation model of colorectal cancer. The model tracks the development of adenomas and their progression to invasive colorectal cancer and incorporates the effects of risk factors, screening, and treatment on the underlying disease process. In Chapter 1 we describe the development and calibration of the natural history model of colorectal cancer. Using a likelihood-based approach, we simultaneously fit the model to data on the age-specific prevalence of adenomas by number from autopsy studies, the distribution of findings on colonoscopy by location, size, and histology from screening studies, and the stage-, location-, and age-specific incidence of cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. In Chapter 2 we use the calibrated model to estimate what the colorectal cancer incidence and mortality over the past thirty years might have been had the secular trends in risk factors, the dissemination of screening, and the changes in the patterns of care not occurred. We found that the secular trends in the risk factors explain only a small fraction of the trend in incidence; the vast majority of the change in incidence over time is attributable to screening. When screening was first disseminated, the incidence rate rose as individuals with asymptomatic cancers were detected. Over time, screening has lead to a reduction in the incidence of the disease by detecting adenomas for removal, thereby preventing cancers from occurring. Changes in the patterns of care for diagnosed cancer explain 59% of the reduction in colorectal cancer mortality; secular trends in risk factors and screening explain 8% and 32% respectively. Finally, in Chapter 3 we explore whether heterogeneity in the rates of adenoma growth lead to different conclusions about the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. We found that heterogeneity mitigates the reductions in incidence and mortality attributable to screening and may lead to more favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratios but that it does not change the conclusions about which screening strategy is the most effective at reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer and which strategy yields the greatest reduction in colorectal cancer mortality. From a methodologic perspective, together these analyses demonstrate the value of population-based models in informing cancer-control opportunities.


 
Sharon Maccini
2005, Economics
Current Position: Lecturer
Current Employer: Gerald R. Ford School of Public Policy, Univeristy of Michigan
Thesis Title: Community and Environmental Determinants of Child Health
Committee Members: Cutler, Bloom, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: The first and third papers of this dissertation provide evidence on one piece of a broad debate over decentralizing health sectors in developing countries: the popular but undocumented claim that transferring public money to local governments will not affect population health because these governments cannot produce public goods effectively. After 1992, the Philippines increased markedly the amount of national tax revenues transferred annually to local governments in block grants. The formula used to distribute funds among the local governments includes a portion based on equal sharing, providing exogeneity in the per capita block grants (conditioning on correlates of initial population). Within this context, the first chapter explores whether child health responds to locally controlled public resources.I find that children living in localities (barangays) with higher increases in per capita block grants between 1991 and 1995 exhibited differentially higher growth in body mass index and fewer hospitalizations than those in jurisdictions with lower per capita block grants. In the third paper, I estimate the health return to local funds across tiers of local government at the province/city level, again in the context of the Philippine devolution. In a fixed effects model, I estimate the effect of the total per capita block grant on infant mortality rates using vital statistics data. My estimates imply that 30% of the decrease in the registered infant mortality rate in cities between 1990 and 1997 is explained by the increase in the per capita transfer over that period. By contrast, I do not find a significant effect for provinces, suggesting there were offsetting detrimental effects of the concurrent transfer to provinces of administrative responsibility for public health. In the second paper, joint with Dean Yang, we estimate the socioeconomic returns to health human capital for Indonesian women using rainfall shocks in the year and location of birth to instrument for adult height. We find that above-average rainfall at birth leads to an additional half a centimeter of height. Instrumented height significantly covaries with other measures of good health and is positively associated with years of schooling and per capita household expenditures.


 
Pamela McMahon
2005, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Associate Director and Assistant Professor in Radiology
Current Employer: Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School
Thesis Title: Policy Assessment of Medical Imaging Utilization: Methods and Applications
Committee Members: Gazelle, Kuntz, Weeks, Weinstein, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT: We developed and applied decision-analytic methods to two controversial uses of diagnostic imaging technologies: diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) with positron-emission tomography (PET) and screening for lung cancer with computed tomography (CT). In Chapter 2, we evaluated strategies for the diagnosis of early-stage AD: usual care (a clinical exam plus a structural imaging test) with or without an additional functional imaging exam (PET or functional magnetic resonance imaging [fMRI]). Using our best estimates for inputs, PET yielded fewer benefits (at a higher cost) than usual care, and fMRI had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (vs. usual care) of $598,800/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Our main conclusion was that resources should be allocated towards developing better therapies, not improving diagnostic tests. The published article informed Medicare’s National Coverage Decision, an example of the use of modeling to inform decision making in practice. Chapter 3 reviews lung cancer screening trials and discusses two limitations of published cost-effectiveness analyses of lung cancer screening: their use of stage-shift models and their methods for accounting for smokers’ elevated competing mortality. In Chapter 4, we estimated heart disease and other-cause (non-lung cancer, non-heart disease) mortality rates, stratified by gender, race (black/white), age group, and smoking status. These mortality rates were inputs for the model described below. We developed a Bayesian approach to synthesize survey data linked to mortality outcomes, vital statistics data, and published risk ratios from cohort studies, correcting for known inconsistencies between the datasets. In Chapter 5, we developed a comprehensive microsimulation model of lung cancer, populated with cohorts of the U.S. population. The natural history model simulated lung cancer development, growth, and metastasis, not transitions between disease stages (e.g., local to regional), avoiding biases inherent in stage-shift models. Survival depended on the underlying disease stage and treatment received. The model ( screening) was calibrated to observed incidence rates, survival rates, and characteristics of cancers (cell type, stage, size), and validated by reproducing existing trial results (+ screening). As evidence-based decisions, policies, and guidelines become the standard among health care payers and providers, decision-analytic modeling and Bayesian evidence synthesis will serve as important tools for formally combining information.


 
Norman Grantham Miller
2005, Economics
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Medicine
Current Employer: Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Stanford University
Thesis Title: Empirical Essays on Major Forces in Health, Population, and Development
Committee Members: Cutler, Bloom, Chay, Frank
ABSTRACT: The first paper addresses ongoing debate about whether or not family planning programs in developing countries reduce fertility or improve socio-economic outcomes. Despite suggestive associations, disagreement persists because the availability and use of modern contraceptives is generally determined by both supply- and demand-side forces. This paper provides new evidence on the role of contraceptive supply by exploiting the surprisingly haphazard expansion of one of the world's oldest and largest family planning organizations - PROFAMILIA of Colombia. Analyses indicate that family planning allowed Colombian women to postpone their first birth, have approximately one-half fewer children, get more education, work more, and live independently. A diverse array of evidence suggests that non-random program allocation is not responsible for these results. Family planning in Colombia appears to have reduced the otherwise substantial costs of fertility control and may be among the most effective development interventions. The second paper (joint with David Cutler) investigates the contribution of public health improvements to health advances in the historical United States. Mortality rates in the US fell more rapidly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries than any other period in American history. This decline coincided with an epidemiological transition and the disappearance of a mortality "penalty" associated with living in urban areas. There is little empirical evidence and much unresolved debate about what caused these improvements, however. This paper investigates the causal influence of clean water technologies - filtration and chlorination - on mortality in major cities during the early 20th century. Plausibly exogenous variation in the timing and location of technology adoption is used to identify these effects, and the validity of this identifying assumption is examined in detail. We find that clean water was responsible for nearly half of the total mortality reduction in major cities, three-quarters of the infant mortality reduction, and nearly two-thirds of the child mortality reduction. Rough calculations suggest that the rate of return to these technologies was greater than 20 to 1 with a cost per life-year saved by clean water of about $500 in 2003 dollars. Implications for developing countries are briefly considered. The third paper (joint with Srikanth Kadiyala) investigates the role of supply-side incentives in promoting efficiency in health care. Although the empirical literature on this issue is voluminous, we contend that its findings are unclear because of the well-known difficulties of disentangling causation from correlation. We provide new evidence on how health insurance arrangements affect preventive cancer screening by exploiting age discontinuities in their recommended use among individuals without elevated risk. Preventive screenings are modern medicine's primary weapon against cancer, the second leading cause of death in the Unites States. Our approach is attractive because differential changes in screening across these age thresholds do not reflect unobserved heterogeneity in enrollee health or preferences. We find that HMOs are two to six percentage points more likely to provide appropriate screenings at recommended ages than are indemnity plans. These differences translate into 14% to 70% more screenings across age thresholds but only imply survival differences of one to two days. Managed care appears to achieve higher screening rates by selective contracting with more efficient health care providers or by threatening network exclusion to induce more efficient care. Although the utilization differences we estimate are large, it is perhaps more striking how low cancer screening rates are at recommended ages under any insurance arrangement.


 
Debra Joy Perez
2005, Political Analysis
Current Position: Senior Program Officer
Current Employer: Research and Evaluation Unit, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Thesis Title: Understanding Latino Health Policy and Barriers to Care
Committee Members: Blendon, Alegria, Campbell, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT: Little is known about how cultural changes influence the Latino experience in healthcare. Issues such as generational status, nativity, English proficiency and age of arrival at immigration may have a profound effect on the rate at which Latinos experience barriers to medical care, perceive discrimination and support health policy issues. Paper 1- This paper investigates how variation in the components of acculturation and experiences of discrimination could explain differences in the report of four barriers to care and also assesses the role of cultural factors as potential predictors of discrimination. For Latinos, traditional measures of acculturation were associated with increased barriers including being in the US longer, speaking English and having an American identity. I conclude that as Latinos become more acculturated they have higher expectations of the healthcare system and report more barriers to care. Paper 2- This study examines the prevalence of discrimination among Latinos and the correlates of perceived discrimination including SES and cultural factors. Cubans are less likely to perceive discrimination compared to other Latino subgroups even after controlling for SES and cultural factors. English proficient and fourth generation Latinos are more likely to perceive discrimination compared to Spanish proficient and earlier generation Latinos. I conclude assimilation is associated with more discrimination and that the benefit of isolated ethnic enclaves might explain Cuban rates of reporting discrimination. Paper 3- This study assesses the rates of non-Hispanic white/Latino and non-immigrant/immigrant differences in three measures of support for healthcare: (a) Identifying health and healthcare as a priority for government action; (b) viewing healthcare as a policy-oriented priority; and (c) identifying healthcare as a determinant of candidate voting. I conclude that for US Latinos healthcare voting is associated with indicators of assimilation and that as Latinos become more integrated into mainstream American culture they also approximate majority views on healthcare.


 
Stephanie Shimada
2005, Organizational Behavior
Current Position: Research Scientist, Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research; Research Assistant Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management
Current Employer: Bedford VA Medical Center; Boston University School of Public Health
Thesis Title: Selection in the Medicare Program
Committee Members: Cleary, Huskamp, McGuire, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT: This dissertation uses data from the Medicare Managed Care and Fee For Service versions of the Consumer Assessments of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) surveys to examine market, plan, and individual characteristics that drive selection into Medicare managed care. The first paper examines selection into Medicare managed care (MMC) based on beneficiary characteristics such as health status, education, and race and then explores the association between market characteristics and favorable health-based selection into MMC. Results showed that although MMC plans continued to experience favorable selection on health, this effect diminished in areas with higher MMC penetration, more MMC options, and more competition among plans. Ethnic minorities were more likely to be enrolled in MMC than whites. The strongest predictor of enrollment in Medicare managed care was low educational attainment. The effect of educational attainment was even more pronounced among healthy beneficiaries. Medicare patients’ ratings and reports of the quality of their health care, as assessed by CAHPS surveys, are generally lower for sicker beneficiaries than for healthy beneficiaries. The second paper examines this ‘quality gap’ between sick and healthy beneficiaries’ CAHPS scores and explores its association with biased selection into Medicare managed care. The results show a significant association between the quality gap and several CAHPS composites. Areas with a large quality gaps in patient-provider communication tend to have fewer sick beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare managed care. Areas with large quality gaps in the quality domains assessed by the “Getting Needed Care” and “Getting Care Quickly” composites tend to have more sick beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare managed care plans. The third paper explores the choices of Medicare beneficiaries who were involuntarily disenrolled from their Medicare managed care plans to gain an understanding of the effects of market, plan, and individual characteristics on subsequent choice of coverage. Involuntarily disenrolled beneficiaries were less likely to return to traditional Medicare in states with higher Medigap rates. Those who chose to remain in a Medicare managed care plan were more likely to enroll in plans with lower premiums, lower copayment rates for doctor and specialist visits, and higher CAHPS scores.


 
Benjamin Sommers
2005, Economics
Current Position: Resident, Internal Medicine/Primary Care
Current Employer: Department of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital
Thesis Title: The Dynamics of Public and Private Health Insurance Coverage in the United States
Committee Members: Newhouse, Cutler, Swartz
ABSTRACT: The dissertation considers the dynamics of three types of health insurance coverage – employer-provided plans, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) – and explores how the pressures of premium growth, swelling ranks of the uninsured, and budgetary shortfalls have affected health coverage for non-elderly Americans over the past decade. The first chapter focuses on private insurance, presenting an economic model of how employers respond to rapidly increasing premiums. The model attempts to bridge the gap between economists’ view of employer-provided health insurance – which holds that workers bear the full cost of insurance through reduced wages – and the view held by non-economists that insurance costs are a burden on firms. The paper also presents empirical tests that offer support for several of the model’s predictions. The second chapter explores the retention rates of children in Medicaid and CHIP from 1998-2001, using the Current Population Survey (CPS) March Supplement. I find that 28% of children in Medicaid or CHIP at a given point in time have disenrolled within 12 months. Then, I classify the disenrollment into three categories – loss of eligibility, acquisition of other health insurance, and “drop-out” (children who leave despite continuing eligibility and no other insurance). Overall, I estimate that 1 in 8 children drop out of Medicaid and CHIP each year and become uninsured, despite ongoing eligibility. Multivariate analysis suggests that the clinical encounter plays a key role in keeping children enrolled in public insurance. The third chapter compares retention in CHIP and Medicaid from 2001-2004, using the CPS’s new CHIP-specific survey item. The results indicate that CHIP has a relative risk of 1.25 for drop-out, compared to Medicaid. Multivariate logistic regression reveals that children with parents on Medicaid are much less likely to drop-out than children whose parents are not enrolled. The causality of this association is supported by instrumental variables regression. This suggests that policies covering children and adults separately are less effective at expanding insurance coverage. I also find that drop-out is 30% lower among children in states with a single combined public insurance program, rather than separate CHIP and Medicaid programs. Overall, I conclude that the United States should move towards more coordinated public insurance programs that target families for coverage rather than individuals.


 
Chien-Chang Wu
2005, Ethics
Current Position: Assistant Professor and Attending Psychiatrist
Current Employer: National Taiwan University and National Taiwan University Hospital
Thesis Title: Who Counts? The General and the Particular in Health Care Policy Making
Committee Members: Jasanoff, Brandt, Kawachi
ABSTRACT: It has been a dilemma to count and balance the general and the particular in health care policy making. This thesis aims to explore this issue by addressing the institutions and epistemic frames in three different domains. Paper I: Individual Sleep Quality and Neighborhood Perceived Security Individual sleep quality has been an important health care policy problem; however, its relationship to neighborhood collective perception of security has not been well studied. Using a representative sample of 40,000 individuals from a cross-sectional survey in Taiwan, this paper conducted a four-level random intercept multilevel analysis to explore the above relationship. As the percentage of people feeling secure increased, individual sleep quality increased in all groups. However, not all groups of people enjoy the benefit to the same extent. Paper II: Odyssey of SSRI-induced Suicide: Co-Production of Pharmaceutical Knowledge and Regulatory Culture Whether SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors) could induce suicidal behaviors has been fiercely debated in the U.S. Using a co-productionist framework, this paper argues that pharmaceutical knowledge (science) and pharmaceutical regulatory culture (society) are co-produced. Fixation on RCTs may make SSRI-induced suicidality inequitably invisible. Adopting a quasi-insurance scheme funded by a defined proportion of pharmaceutical sales, I recommend setting up an independent research fund to sponsor research into rare severe pharmaceutical adverse effects and a no-fault compensation fund to compensate for rare severe pharmaceutical adverse effects. Paper III: From Standard of Care to Quality of Care: The Epistemic Economy of Appropriate Health Care Political economy of health care has an interactive relationship with institutions and epistemic frames used to construct the appropriateness of health care. In order to show this, this paper addresses two U.S. institutions: (1) medical malpractice litigation with individual-based approach; (2) managed care and evidence-based medicine with population-based approach. It points out the normative implications in choosing epistemic frames. Finally, it argues for maintaining a credible forum to balance the individual-based approach and population-based approach in defining appropriate health care.


 
Vivian Wu
2005, Economics
Current Position: Assistant Professor
Current Employer: School of Public Planning and Development, University of Southern California
Thesis Title: Managed Care and the Changing Hospital Markets in the 1990s
Committee Members: Cutler, McGuire, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: The first chapter examines the evidence for managed care plans' price bargaining with hospitals. The observed lower prices in managed care plans could be consistent with three hypotheses: (1) cost differences, because some plans use lower-cost hospitals or their patients get different levels of care within a hospital; (2) price discrimination, where a hospital with market power charges lower prices for buyers with more elastic demand; and (3) managed care’s price bargaining, whereby prices vary because insurers have different degrees of bargaining power. Using a unique panel dataset with actual hospital prices in Massachusetts between 1994 and 2000, I find that, although cost differences and price discrimination hypotheses explain some of the variation in expenditures, the results are most consistent with a market where managed care plans actively negotiate prices with hospitals. The second chapter analyzes hospitals' pricing behavior in response to major financial losses from Medicare. Existing hypotheses provide no clear prediction as to whether this strategic behavior would occur or whether it differs by ownership type. This chapter uses a natural experiment - the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 and finds Hospitals in more competitive initial markets offset the burden dollar by dollar by rasing prices to private insurers. In addition, hospitals that gained bargaining position through provider consolidations and the relaxation of channeling efforts by managed care were able to raise prices even more. The third chapter studies the price effects of hospital closures on competitors. The demand for inpatient services has been declining over the last twenty years, accompanied by about a 14 percent contraction in inpatient bed capacity. A large portion of this capacity decline is due to hospital closures. Although hospital closures help to eliminate excess facilities, they also enhance the bargaining position of the surviving hospitals. Analyzing surviving rivals between 1992 and 1998, this paper finds that hospitals located nearer to the closure sites improve their bargaining position more than do other hospitals in the market. In addition, hospitals in areas experiencing multiple closures were able to attain greater price growth.


 
Wei (Wilson) Zhang
2005, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Management
Current Employer: China Europe International Business School
Thesis Title: Hospital Quality, and Patient Trust in Care for Colorectal Cancer
Committee Members: Zaslavsky, Cleary, Ayanian
ABSTRACT:
Quality of care has been of growing importance to U.S. health care researchers and policy makers. There is a widespread desire to improve medical outcomes and enhance the patient-physician relationship. This dissertation focuses on care for colorectal cancer, primarily using California Cancer Registry data, and presents the analysis of three prominent quality issues: trust in physicians, choice of hospitals for surgery, and hospital profiling.

In Paper One, I explored the impact of patients’ experiences during medical care on their trust in physicians using a survey of 1,602 colorectal cancer patients. I used logistic regression on trust scores to assess the association of specific health care domains with the likelihood of having low trust, controlling for patient sociodemographic and clinical covariates. During medical care experiences, problems in access, patient education and particularly coordination and continuity of care seriously affected patients’ trust in their health care providers, suggesting that efforts to improve these aspects of medical services may enhance patients’ trust.

In Paper Two, I studied the effect of patient characteristics on hospital choice. Using data on 38,237 patients, associations of patient attributes with surgical care at high-volume hospitals, teaching hospitals, and hospitals with different level of adjusted mortality were assessed with multivariate regression analysis. Patients with more severe clinical status, of minority ethnicity, and of less privileged socioeconomic status were significantly less likely to be admitted to the high-quality institutions for cancer surgery, suggesting the potential benefit of improving access for patient outcomes.

In Paper Three, I evaluated the utility of cancer registry data for profiling of hospitals by survival of colorectal cancer patients. With 5 years of data from California supplemented with hospital discharge abstracts, I fitted univariate and bivariate hierarchical models with hospital random effects and used a Bayesian algorithm to provide valid estimates of hospital profiles for survival. For larger hospitals, adjusted 30-day survival rate can be estimated with adequate precision to support useful and valid comparisons of hospital quality, especially with additional information from the bivariate-outcome model, suggesting that the already-collected cancer registry data can find a new use for profiling cancer care providers.


 
Tanya Bentley
2006, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Assistant Researcher; Adjunct Researcher
Current Employer: UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; RAND Corporation
Thesis Title: US Folic Acid Fortification Policy: Methods for Evaluating Folate Intake and Projecting Health Outcomes
Committee Members: Kuntz, Weinstein, Willett
ABSTRACT: Research in the early 1990s established that increasing prenatal intake of folate or folic acid early in pregnancy can significantly reduce the risk of neural tube defects (NTDs) in newborns. NTDs are some of the most common birth defects in the U.S., affecting approximately 2,500 live births and 1,500 terminated pregnancies each year. In an effort to reduce the number of NTDs, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1998 implemented the most significant fortification act since the 1940s, mandating the fortification of all enriched grain products with folic acid. The fortification was expected to add approximately 100 micrograms (mcg) of folic acid per day on average to the diet of those residing in the U.S., and to increase from 29% to 50% the percent of women of childbearing age consuming a total of at least 400 mcg/day of the vitamin. However, folic acid fortification has the potential for health implications beyond the reduction in NTD-risk, including decreased risks of heart disease and colon cancer. At the same time, excessive intakes may mask the anemia of vitamin B-12 deficiency, which could delay the diagnosis and treatment and thereby allow the often-irreversible neurological manifestations of the disease to progress. It is not currently known the degree to which folic acid fortification has affected total folate intake, and controversy remains regarding the appropriate level of fortification to meet these competing health risks and benefits. Accordingly, this research provides national estimates of total folate consumption before and after fortification, and quantifies the projected changes in disease burden for four fortification scenarios. We also explored the potential bias associated with categorizing continuous variables - such as folate - in decision-analytic models. In paper one, we analyzed two waves of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys - adjusted for measurement error - to estimate changes in food, supplement, and total folate intake since policy implementation. While our analysis shows a substantial increase of total folate consumption after fortification among U.S. adults, we found considerable variations in intake by age, gender, and race/ethnicity. The proportion of women of childbearing age consuming greater than 400 mcg/day of folate did increase but did not reach the FDA's 50% target, varying by race/ethnicity from 23% to 33%. Although all women in this age group increased their median total folate intake by at least 100 mcg/day, blacks and Mexican-Americans still lagged behind whites in total consumption and may be target populations for additional fortification or supplementation policies. Among older persons who may be at increased risk for B-12 deficiency masking, the percent consuming over 1,000 mcg/day (the "tolerable upper intake level") at least doubled among whites and black men, but remained under 5% for all groups. In paper two, we compared annual disease incidence, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs associated with four scenarios: no folic acid fortification; or fortifying with 140, 350, or 700 mcg of folic acid per 100 g enriched grain. For each scenario, we estimated age-, gender-, race-, and folate-specific annual incidence of NTDs, myocardial infarctions (MIs), colon cancer, and B-12 masking. We predicted that at the population level, the greatest benefits from fortification would be in MI prevention, with between 31,441 and 101,116 cases averted per year in steady state for the 140-mcg and 700-mcg fortification levels, respectively. This range was between 6,229 to 14,908 for colon cancer and 184 to 1,425 for NTDs, while that for the projected number of new B-12 maskings was 86 to 964 cases caused. Compared with no fortification, all post-fortification strategies provided QALY gains and cost savings at the population level. This was also the case for all age, gender, and race/ethnicity-specific subgroups except for Mexican-American males and black females aged 65+, who were predicted to experience QALY losses and positive cost outlays at one or both of the lower fortification levels. Fortifying at 700 mcg/100 g enriched grain product was projected to strongly dominate all other scenarios at both the population and subgroup levels, with population benefits of 278,849 QALYs gained and $4 billion saved. While the predicted benefits to whites were substantially greater than those to blacks and Mexican-Americans, we concluded that the population-level health and economic gains far outweighed the losses, and that an increase in the level of fortification deserves further consideration in order to see positive net gains among all age, gender, and race/ethnicity-specific subgroups. Finally, in paper three we considered a methodological question that arises when evaluating interventions over time that consider continuously valued risk factors, such as folate intake and risk of NTDs. While Markov models can be used in such situations to simulate disease risk over time, to do so it is necessary to categorize model inputs and thus assume homogeneous risk within each category, which may in turn bias the results. The objective of this final analysis was therefore to assess the tradeoffs between model bias and complexity when categorizing continuous risk factors in decision-analytic models. Using generic Markov cohort and Monte Carlo simulation models, we defined bias as the percentage change in life expectancy when using 2-15 categories of risk factor in the cohort model to that when modeling the risk factor as a continuous variable in the Monte Carlo simulation. We found that bias was positive - indicating that categorization overestimated life expectancy gains - and that it approached zero as the number of risk factor categories increased and did not exceed 4%. The bias was strongest when the risk factor effect was highest, was consistently less than 1.5% when at least three categories were used, and became negative when disease risk was extremely high. Overall, we concluded that categorizing continuously valued risk factors in decision-analytic models has a negligible effect on model outcomes.


 
Thomas Concannon
2006, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Medicine, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies
Current Employer: Tufts University School of Medicine, Tufts University
Thesis Title: A Cost and Outcomes Analysis of Emergency Transport, Inter-Hospital Transfer and Hospital Expansion Policies in Cardiac Care
Committee Members: Newhouse, Kent, Normand
ABSTRACT: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) yields better clinical outcomes than thrombolytic therapy (TT) in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). TT is still widely used because most U.S. hospitals are not equipped to perform PCI. The first of three studies in this dissertation examines the impact on patient mortality and hospital volumes of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) strategies to increase delivery of patients with STEMI to PCI-capable hospitals. A second study investigates the clinical benefits and costs of hospital-based strategies to increase PCI capacity. A third study explores the association between the race, ethnicity and neighborhood of patients with STEMI and delay in EMS care. All three studies were based on a detailed geospatial model of Dallas County Texas EMS and hospital systems. Studies one and two drew patients from the Atlantic Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team (C-PORT) trial into a series of Monte-Carlo micro-simulations that tested EMS and hospital strategies for increasing the availability of PCI. Both studies employed a recently developed and validated predictive model to estimate the probability of 30-day mortality with PCI and with TT after STEMI. In the third study, we used 2004 administrative data from ten Dallas area municipal EMS systems to examine the relationship of patient race and neighborhood to time in EMS care. In the first two studies, we found that nearly all of the potential mortality benefit of PCI can be realized with policies that target the procedure to high-risk and high benefit patients. Policies that seek to make the procedure universally available confer little additional benefit at substantially higher costs and potentially adverse effects on EMS and hospital systems. In the third study, we found a statistically significant but not clinically meaningful difference in time to treatment among Asian Pacific Islanders in EMS care, compared to whites. This study did, however, demonstrate an unexpected and potentially harmful delay in EMS care among women compared to men. Efforts to expand the availability of PCI should be targeted to patients who can benefit most from the procedure. Calls for universal availability of PCI have become common in the cardiac care literature, and the case for this position is generally based on average patient outcomes as reported in clinical trials. This approach to PCI expansion masks important heterogeneity in the outcomes and experiences of patients with STEMI. Policy development that takes this heterogeneity in account can capture most of the benefits of universal PCI while minimizing adverse effects on costs and systems of care.


 
Rena Conti
2006, Economics
Current Position: Instructor
Current Employer: Department of Pediatrics, Community Health Sciences, Institute for Molecular Pediatric Sciences, The University of Chicago
Thesis Title: Health Production and the Economic Value of New Treatments for Depression
Committee Members: Frank, Berndt, Curtler, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: This dissertation focuses on health production and the economic value of medical innovation for individuals and society. Specifically, the thesis contributes to the literature on the economic consequences of major depression to individuals’ working lives and the value of new pharmaceutical based treatments from the patient’s point of view. Making progress on these topics is important for several reasons: depression is a prevalent and often chronic condition nationally and worldwide; new product introductions for the treatment of major depression have been a prominent success story since the late 1980s and spending on depression related treatment is high and growing; despite this, depression remains under recognized and under-treated in the US population. Evaluating these issues for major depression and its treatment is challenging; mental health care is a case where the defining issues of health economics are present to a great degree. The first paper, “Early Retirement and DI/SSI Applications: Exploring the Impact of Depression” (with Richard Frank and Ernie Berndt) investigates the direct and indirect impact of depression on public disability insurance (DI) applications and early retirement behavior among older workers. We account for the endogenous relationship of health and work using two analytic strategies, difference in differences and generalized estimating equations. We find that depression negatively and significantly impacts individuals’ labor market participation and significantly increases their probability of retiring early and applying for DI benefits. The magnitude of depression’s effect alone on these outcomes is similar to physical illness. The indirect impact of depression is also a significant predictor of DI applications and early retirement for men and women. In magnitude, the indirect effects appear to be equal or greater to the independent effects in predicting DI applications and early retirement. The results suggest that depression has a negative and significant impact on public disability programs and early retirement behavior. Accounting for the independent effects of depression, disability associated with physical illness may be smaller than the official statistics suggest. Effective and cost effective treatments exist. There may be great economic gains in increasing depression treatment awareness, access to treatment and continuity of depression care for public programs, employers and individuals. The second paper, “The Economic Value of New Treatments for Depression”, focuses on estimating the economic value of new pharmaceutical based treatments for depression using demand behavior as an alternative approach to cost effectiveness analysis and price index based productivity measures. Data on individual level treatment choices is drawn from the 2002 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. A random utility based demand system is estimated using information on treatment characteristics that matter for patient and physician decision making. Based on parameter estimates of a demand function, consumer benefits from newer depression treatments are derived using measures of exact consumer surplus. The average benefit derived from newer antidepressants is estimated to be approximately $300-500 per user per year of treatment. The incremental benefits of new depression treatments compared to older medications are estimated to be 3 times the incremental difference in out of pocket costs paid by consumers and 14 times the incremental difference in total social spending. This finding is based on the difference in out of pocket costs between older and newer antidepressants being larger than the difference in total costs paid by all parties for newer relative to older antidepressants. The results suggest that on average new treatments for depression provide large benefits to individuals with a primary diagnosis of depression that outweigh private and public spending on them. The third paper, “Are Antidepressants Overused?” (with David Cutler and Alisa Busch), evaluates the duration, prevalence and associated spending on mental health and non-mental health uses of antidepressants. We identify adult respondents of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey receiving an antidepressant prescription in 2002. The duration of use and indications for use are correlated with clinical evidence drawn from a meta-analysis of published studies and an expert panel review. Spending on antidepressants overall and by appropriateness category is determined. We find that one tenth of antidepressants are used for more than one year and one third is used for one month. 68% of antidepressant use is indicated by FDA approval. 13% of antidepressant use has an associated diagnosis that is non-FDA approved, but supported by published research. 19% of antidepressant use is clinically inappropriate. Aggregating over all uses, $32B was spent on antidepressants in the US in 2002; $7B was spent on inappropriate care. The results suggest that antidepressants are frequently used for longer or shorter durations than efficacy studies and clinical guidelines suggest. Antidepressants are also commonly used for non mental health and non-FDA approved indications. Interpreting this use is complicated. Off label uses of antidepressants may provide significant benefit in the treatment of some conditions. Newer antidepressants are much more likely to be used off label, where the safety risks are small. Taking into account duration of treatment would decrease the percentage of use considered to be clinically appropriate. Accounting for sociological correlates of use and subthreshold depression would also decrease the percentage of use considered to be clinically appropriate. The annual economic burden of inappropriate use totals $7B, but is small in comparison to the costs of depression under-treatment. Systematic investigation into the effectiveness of medications used in a manner consistent with clinical practice is warranted. Improved incentives for the collection of such information may provide significant public benefit.


 
Benjamin Cook
2006, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Research Associate; Instructor
Current Employer: Center for Multicultural Mental Health Research, Cambridge Health Alliance; Harvard Medical School
Thesis Title: Hunt for the Right Counterfactual: Non-linear Adjustment in Minority Health Care Studies
Committee Members: McGuire, Meara, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT: The numerous studies of racial disparities in health services have not achieved consensus on the definition and method for measurement of disparities. In large part, the ambiguity in the definition of disparities stems from the lack of an observable counterfactual: In health services research, one cannot observe the counterfactual in which a black individual takes on white race or racial discrimination is eliminated. A similar situation occurs in studies of immigrant mental health. Exposure to the US has been found to be detrimental to mental health, but may be the result of differing immutable characteristics among immigrant cohorts. This dissertation applies and compares methods in non-linear models that adjust for some variables while allowing others to mediate differences. The methods are applied in Medicaid Managed Care and immigrant mental health settings. More rigorous comparison of different adjustment methods is conducted using total medical expenditure from MEPS data.


 
Kevin Haninger
2006, Ethics
Current Position: AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellow
Current Employer: Environmental Protection Agency
Thesis Title: Valuing Health for Public Policy
Committee Members: Hammitt, Brandt, Daniels, Weinstein
ABSTRACT: Paper 1: Willingness to Pay for Quality-Adjusted Life Years: Empirical Inconsistency Between Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and Economic Welfare Theory We design and conduct a stated-preference survey to test whether willingness to pay (WTP) to reduce risk of acute illness is proportional to the corresponding change in expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). For the short-term illnesses we consider, proportionality is required by economic theory if QALYs measure utility for health. Proportionality implies a constant WTP per QALY and that WTP is proportional to changes in both health quality and duration of illness. WTP is elicited using double-bounded, dichotomous-choice questions in which respondents (randomly selected from the United States general adult population, n = 2,795) decide whether to purchase a more expensive food to reduce the risk of foodborne illness. Health risks vary by baseline probability of illness, reduction in probability, duration and severity of illness, and conditional probability of mortality. The expected gain in QALYs is calculated using respondent-assessed decrements in health-related quality of life if ill combined with the stated duration of illness and reduction in probability. We reject the hypothesis that WTP is proportional to changes in expected QALYs and find diminishing marginal WTP for severity and duration of illness prevented. Our results suggest that individuals do not have a constant rate of WTP for changes in QALYs, which implies that cost-effectiveness analysis using cost per expected QALY gained is not consistent with economic welfare theory. Paper 2: Effects of Health and Longevity on Financial Risk Tolerance We investigate the effects of health and life expectancy on aversion to financial risks. In the first part of the paper, we consider a standard life-cycle consumption model in which an individual chooses his optimal consumption path for an exogenously determined level of health and life expectancy. We examine preferences for a risk to lifetime income and show that the effects of health and longevity on risk tolerance are generally ambiguous. An exception occurs when optimal consumption is constant over the remaining lifetime, a benchmark case in which health and longevity do not affect risk tolerance. However, health and longevity have no effect on risk tolerance for most standard utility functions used in the economics literature, even if consumption is not constant. In the second half of the paper, we design and conduct a stated-preference survey to empirically test the effects of health and longevity on risk tolerance. Survey respondents were randomly selected adults from the United States (n = 2,795). The survey includes self-reported measures of health as well as dichotomous-choice questions concerning gambles on lifetime income that allow us to classify respondents into four groups that can be ordered by relative risk tolerance. We estimate regression models relating relative risk tolerance to self-reported health, actuarial estimates of life expectancy, and other respondent characteristics. Our empirical results suggest that financial risk tolerance is positively associated with both health and life expectancy. Paper 3: The Role of Equity Weights in Allocating Health and Medical Resources Equity weights have been proposed as a way to incorporate distributional concerns into the economic evaluation of health and medicine, but their intended role for policymaking remains unclear. We propose two possible roles for equity weights in public policy: equity weights as decision rules that represent the resolution of questions of distributive justice when allocating health and medical resources or, more modestly, equity weights as decision tools that inform public deliberation about how to set such priorities. We identify five conditions of adequacy for the construction and use of equity weights as decision rules. These conditions include the admissibility of preferences for equity, the specification of the equity weighting function, the treatment of heterogeneous preferences in resolving disagreements about resource allocation priorities, the completeness of equity weights in capturing the full range of concerns for equity, and the resulting transparency of resource allocation decisions. We argue that cost-effectiveness rules based on equity weights that fail to satisfy one or more conditions could produce inequitable results, and that equity weights ultimately fail to resolve the underlying need for a deliberative process. Equity weights have more promise as tools that inform and even focus public debate.


 
Rachel Mosher Henke
2006, Medical Sociology
Current Position: Research Leader
Current Employer: Thomson Reuters
Thesis Title: Quality Improvement for Depression: Organizational and Provider Level Factors
Committee Members: McGuire, Cleary, Frank, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT: Improving the quality of depression treatment in the primary care setting is an important yet elusive goal. Few individuals with depression receive adequate treatment in this setting even though multiple efficacious treatments exist. National public awareness campaigns and educational efforts have focused on improving the quality of depression care but there is little indication that these efforts have had an effect. The aim of this dissertation is to explore the reason behind the limited success of these efforts. The first essay explores how organizational factors and clinician characteristics affect the provision of depression care. The second essay examines patterns and correlates of depression treatment adjustment, as increasing the intensity of care for patients who have not improved is known to improve outcomes. The third essay investigates the physicians’ perspective on barriers to depression treatment. All three essays provide insight on promising ways to approach quality improvement goals in future efforts.


 
Cara James
2006, Medical Sociology
Current Position: Senior Policy Analyst, Race/Ethnicity and Health Care; and Director, Barbara Jordan Health Policy Scholars Program
Current Employer: Kaiser Family Foundation
Thesis Title: End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD): Factors Affecting Patient’s Treatment and Care Assessments
Committee Members: Cleary, Ayanian, Marsden
ABSTRACT: Nearly 500,000 people in the United States have ESRD, and the rate at which new cases are diagnosed continues to increase. ESRD patients receive a transplant, dialysis, or both. Given a shortage of available kidneys, ESRD patients spend an exorbitant amount of time at dialysis facilities. Differences in patient and facility characteristics can lead to differential experiences and treatment outcomes. Racial disparities in kidney transplantation and dialysis are well documented. This dissertation seeks to better understand the ESRD patient experience by examining the relationship between information sources and transplant decisions and the impact of dialysis facility characteristics on patient ratings of satisfaction and other quality indicators. The first study of this dissertation hypothesizes that observed racial disparities in renal transplant preferences and certainty are due in part to differences in information sources. The results of this study suggest that after controlling for demographic characteristics, patients with more sources of information were more likely to want a transplant, be certain about their decision. Black patients had fewer sources than white patients, and were less likely to say they received enough information from their doctor. They also had lower expectations than whites for a much better quality of life following transplant. Blacks were less certain in their transplant decision than whites. However, after adjusting for sources of information this difference decreases. Increasing the amount of information all patients receive can improve treatment decisions and reduce disparities. The second study analyzed data from a pilot study of the ICH CAHPS survey to develop a case-mix adjustment model for use when comparing patient assessments of care among hemodialysis providers. The results of this study suggest that CAHPS results should be adjusted for patient age, education, and self-reported health status. The results also suggest that language spoken at home should also be considered, but more research is needed to say definitively whether it should be included in a case-mix adjustment model. These results are consisted with other studies of CAHPS data, and show that adjusting patient assessments of care at hemodialysis facilities for patient mix is an important part of ensuring equitable comparisons of care. The final study of this dissertation examined the relationship between dialysis facility characteristics and patient assessments of care, and other quality indicators. Using data from the ICH CAHPS survey in combination with data from the ESRD Facility Survey and the Renal Cost Report, along with the case-mix model developed in the second study, we investigated the role of facility size, chain affiliation, staffing practices, age, and competition on patient assessments of care, facility deaths, facility transfers, and prescriptions for Epoetin. Results from this study found a significant relationship between CAHPS ratings of dialysis facilities and their staffing patterns and facility deaths, transfers and Epoetin prescriptions. There was little relationship between facility characteristics and CAHPS ratings of doctors. Chain affiliation and facility size were two variables that were consistently significant.


 
Srikanth Kadiyala
2006, Economics
Current Position: Assistant Professor, Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research and Policy Program, Health Science Department
Current Employer: University of Washington
Thesis Title: Empirical Essays on Family Health History and Managed Care
Committee Members: Cutler, McGuire, Newhouse
ABSTRACT: The first papers examines how incidence of cancer within the family affects an individual's demand for health insurance and cancer screenings? This question is central to the debate on the impact of genetic knowledge on the medical system. For some individuals, cancer in the family reveals information regarding genetic endowment (information effects), which will in turn influence economic behavior. In addition to revealing individual specific information, cancer in the family might also raise awareness of general cancer risk and the disutility from encountering cancer (salience effects). Using data from the 2000 U.S. National Health Insurance Survey, I test for the effect of cancer incidence in the family (parents or siblings) on insurance and cancer screening. Furthermore, I use information on the type of cancer to differentiate information from salience effects. In the case of screening I find that information effects from the incidence of genetic cancers in the family increase the rate of screening by 11 to 47%; that the salience effects are approximately a third of the genetic cancer effects. In the case of insurance I find that individuals with a family history of cancer are 5% more likely to be insured via both the information and salience channels. Using the insurance estimate, I show that revelation of genetic knowledge has the potential to increase the average premium in the group health insurance market by 3.2% or 75 dollars because the new entrants into the market are at higher risk. Given this initial change in the premium level, I also present two different estimates for the final insurance rate in the market as this rate crucially depends on the premium elasticity. These findings have implications for how people use information regarding their future health status and for the empirical research on asymmetric information in insurance markets. The second and third papers focus on the relationship between type of insurance and use of prevetive care. The economics literature on managed care and supply-side incentives in medicine has generally emphasized constraining the use of services. However, many of the most valuable (and cost-effective) medical services are used sub-optimally and managed care was initially designed to encourage the use of these services. A wide variety of preventive services fall into this category, including preventive cancer screenings, secondary prevention of MI and diabetes. In these two papers, I provide evidence on how health insurance arrangements influence these preventive care services. I find that at recommended ages, the probability of being screened increases by two to six percentage points more (or 14% to 70% more) in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) than in indemnity plans, preferred-provider organizations (PPOs), or point-of-service (POS) plans. I also find large differences across plans in secondary prevention of diabetes but no differnce in the case of secondary prevention of MI. HMOs appear to achieve these results by contracting selectively with more efficient health care providers.


 
Sun-Young Kim
2006, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Research Associate
Current Employer: Program in Health Decision Science, Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health
Thesis Title: Economic Evaluation of Vaccination Policies Using Mathematical Models: Cost-effectiveness, Externalities, and Affordability of Hepatitis B Vaccination
Committee Members: Weinstein, Goldie, Lieu, Salomon
ABSTRACT: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a global public health challenge that causes significant morbidity and mortality from cirrhosis and primary liver cancer. Because the disease burden and epidemiological features of hepatitis B are disproportionately distributed globally, each region faces different policy questions in controlling HBV using vaccines. In industrialized countries, program efficiency and political commitments are of primary concern, while in low-income countries, financial sustainability must also be taken into consideration. This dissertation seeks to develop and apply various types of mathematical models to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, externalities, and affordability of different hepatitis B vaccination policies in two different settings: the U.S., a representative of low-endemic industrialized countries, and The Gambia, a representative of high-endemic lowest-income countries. The first study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of hepatitis B vaccination strategies targeting potentially high-risk persons attending publicly funded HIV counseling and testing sites (CTSs) in the U.S. The results show that routine vaccination would be both more effective and cost-effective than screening strategies. The findings also imply that integrating a hepatitis B prevention service into existing HIV CTSs and routinely vaccinating high-risk adults would be a highly cost-effective public health intervention and may also have positive effects on the control of other types of viral diseases. The second study develops a dynamic mathematical model in the form of a system of partial differential equations that can describe the transmission dynamics of HBV, incorporating heterogeneity in sex, age, and risk behaviors, and validates the model by comparing the predicted model outcomes with empirical data. Using the model, the study predicts the potential overall impact of the selective vaccination program identified as cost-effective in the first study on the control of HBV at the national level over time. Since programs for high-risk adults often suffer from a lack of political commitment to their implementation, the study also tries to quantify positive externalities that might result from the vaccination program. The study shows that a catch-up vaccination targeting high-risk adults would significantly reduce HBV incidence among those adults, accelerating the control of HBV in the U.S. The study also finds that vaccinating high-risk individuals would provide positive externalities to society, lowering HBV incidence even among unvaccinated low-risk individuals. About 30% of the cumulative number of HBV infections prevented due to the selective vaccination are estimated to come from externalities, and the externalities increase with vaccine coverage in a non-linear pattern. The third study assesses the health impact, cost-effectiveness, and affordability of routine infant hepatitis B vaccination in The Gambia. Although The Gambia is receiving support for the vaccination program from the Global Alliance on Vaccines and Immunization, financial sustainability after the 5-year grant remains a big challenge to maintaining the program. The findings show that universal infant hepatitis B vaccination is highly cost-effective and has the potential to be affordable even with relatively low budgets in The Gambia. However, for the program to be affordable, the problem of narrowing the current funding gap awaits solution, and a full analysis of affordability requires further research.


 
Kalahn Taylor-Clark
2006, Political Analysis
Current Position: Research Director
Current Employer: Engelberg Center for Healthcare Reform, The Brookings Institution
Thesis Title: Public Agendas, Government Action, and Health Policy
Committee Members: Blendon, Reeves, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT: PAPER 1 Confidence in Crisis? Understanding Trust in Government and Public Attitudes Toward Mandatory State Health Powers In response to the possibility of a bioterror attack using smallpox, many states have updated and revised their current public health laws in line with the Model Act, which would effectively give states the right to invoke mandatory state health powers, such as quarantine or vaccine. Previous studies have supported the importance of allying with the public in creating and implementing effective bioterror response policies. Historical case studies and recent research suggest that when the public is not supportive of government health policies, they may be less willing to comply. In this study I analyze a recent survey, and using logistic regression, determine the effects of a set of variables, including aspects of trust in government that have been found in previous studies to influence public opposition to compulsory government health policies, on opinions about compulsory vaccination and quarantine. The results of this study suggest that trust in government is significantly associated with public support for mandatory quarantine and vaccination policy after controlling for other variables. Policy officials should consider the effects of trust in government when publicly communicating mandatory state health powers. PAPER 2 Is America Ready? Understanding public attitudes toward government action to reduce racial inequalities in healthcare In recent decades, research has increasingly documented racial inequalities in healthcare in the U.S. A recent generation of research now focuses on strategies to eliminate racial and ethnic health and healthcare disparities, and in 2000 Federal legislation was enacted to fund, conduct, and initiate programs to reduce healthcare inequalities (S. 1880). A 2002 report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommended that it would be important to, ?Increase awareness of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare among the general public and key stakeholders? (as well as) healthcare providers (16).? In 2004, federal legislators drafted proposals that not only would increase government funding for research on healthcare disparities but also would develop programs to improve the quality of care for racial and ethnic minorities (See: S. 1883/H.R. 3459)(17). Although these proposals remain in draft form, they come at a time when there is some evidence that the public is increasingly supportive of greater spending on healthcare in the U.S., but decreasingly supportive of federal action to aid blacks and minorities. Public attitudes toward government policies to reduce racial healthcare inequalities could influence the future of racially targeted healthcare legislation and programs. Although racial healthcare disparities are currently a tertiary voting issue among the general public, as more research identifies appropriate interventions to eliminate racial and ethnic healthcare inequalities, the federal government will have to increase funding substantially to ensure the development of effective and sustainable policies and programs. Indeed as more resources are devoted to healthcare disparities, research suggests that the public may influence policy outputs. To be sure, harnessing public support for these types of programs will be necessary to eradicate healthcare disparities. Because of the potentially important role of public opinion in influencing future healthcare policies in this area, this paper examines attitudes toward federal action to reduce racial healthcare inequalities. In particular, it seeks to answer the following four questions: Have levels of public support for government action to ensure equal quality healthcare services differed over time and across racial groups? Has awareness of healthcare inequalities differed over time and across racial groups? Is awareness that minorities and African Americans have worse access to or quality of healthcare services than whites associated with beliefs that the federal government should ensure equal quality healthcare services? Does causal attribution for healthcare inequalities play a role in public support for federal action? PAPER 3 News of Disparity: Content Analysis of News Coverage of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare This research examines news coverage of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare from 1994 to 2004. Recent unpublished data show that while medical leaders, researchers, politicians, and campaign planners are dedicating more attention to the issue of racial healthcare inequalities, they do so at a time when the public has become less supportive of federal action in this area (1). Even though public awareness of racial healthcare disparities has increased over the past ten years, awareness has not been uniformly followed by increases in public support for federal action. Research suggests that when variable information is presented through news outlets, shifting opinion in different directions, it is possible to show that each of the message flows has an effect on opinion. This is important because agenda setting literature suggests that news coverage can have a significant impact on public awareness of an issue and can influence the public?s agenda for non-governmental and government action, particularly in relation to racial inequality, which can ultimately affect issue placement on the political agenda. We argue that as more research documents the mediating variables and appropriate interventions to deal with disparities, government funding will need to increase if initiated programs and policies are to be successful. Indeed, garnering public support for such legislation will be one way to increase the probability of legislative passage and sustainability. Given that news may affect public opinion, analysis of messages in this area will be important to gaining public support for governmental efforts to eliminate racial/ethnic disparities in healthcare. In this paper, I conduct an in-depth content analysis of national and regional newspapers to investigate the volume and prominence of coverage and how news journalists are framing the issue of racial and ethnic healthcare inequalities. I then match these messages to public opinion data collected between 1995 and 2004.


 
Carrie Farmer Teh
2006, Medical Sociology
Current Position: Associate Policy Researcher
Current Employer: RAND Corporation
Thesis Title: Chronic Illness, Depression, and the Patient-Provider Relationship: Toward a Model of Biopsychosocial Care
Committee Members: Cleary, Frank, Kleinman
ABSTRACT: Chronic medical conditions are the leading cause of disability in the United States, account for 70 percent of all deaths, and are associated with high health care expenditures. Social and psychological correlates of chronic illness can adversely affect the course and treatment of these conditions. The biopsychosocial model of care posits that medicine must consider these psychosocial dimensions of health and disease when treating chronic illnesses. This dissertation adds to an understanding of the complex relationships between mental, physical and social health in the context of chronic illness and explores the current state of mental health care for people with these conditions. Part One investigates the effect of having a chronic illness on the quality of depression care for people with comorbid major depressive disorder. Results showed that depressed people with a chronic illness were more likely than those without a chronic illness to have their depression recognized by a provider; this was explained by the finding that the chronically ill had stronger patient-provider relationships. Chronically ill depressed people took more antidepressant medications on average, though were no more likely to receive minimally adequate depression treatment or be satisfied with their mental health care than those without a chronic illness. In Part Two, I examine the effects of depression treatment on medical and social outcomes for people with chronic pain and major depressive disorder. Results showed that receiving some depression treatment was associated with better mental health and less interference of pain on work. Receiving minimally adequate depression treatment was associated with improved social functioning. Addressing and treating comorbid depression should be a key feature of a biopsychosocial approach to the treatment of chronic pain. In Part Three, I explore older adults’ experience of getting treatment for chronic pain in the context of a transition to patient-centered care, an important piece of the biopsychosocial model. Results of a grounded theory analysis of interviews with 15 older adults with chronic pain illustrated (1) the ambivalence this population feels toward being the “source of control” in their health care and (2) the importance to this population of having meaningful and continuous patient-provider relationships.


 
Connie Mah Trinacty
2006, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Assistant Professor, Department of Population Medicine
Current Employer: Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute
Thesis Title: Evaluating Racial Differences in Quality of Diabetes Care and Self-Management Practice in an HMO
Committee Members: Adams, Soumerai, Meigs, Piette
ABSTRACT: Racial disparities in health care continue to be a growing problem in the U.S. and a prominent health policy issue. This dissertation focuses on the determinants of racial disparities in diabetes health care and methods for addressing these issues. Previous studies show that black diabetes patients are at greater risk for adverse health events than white diabetes patients, but they may be less likely to gain access to important clinical innovations or to adhere to complex diabetes care regimens. The first study evaluates the differential impact of a quality of care improvement, investigating whether the effect of a widely mandated policy providing coverage of self-management technologies for all diabetes patients helped to reduce race-related barriers to glucose self-monitoring. While this study found that the policy was effective in motivating diabetes patients on hypoglycemic therapy to begin to self-monitor, black patients were less likely to sustain monitoring. This finding led to subsequent studies evaluating racial differences in long-term adherence to self-management practices among diabetes patients within the same HMO setting. These longitudinal studies focus on the effect of race and adherence to two main diabetes self-management constructs: glucose self-monitoring (study 2) and medication use (study 3). In the second study we used a well-established standard of self-monitoring to evaluate race differences in long-term glucose self-monitoring among newly drug-treated diabetes patients in an HMO. Findings showed that racial differences in self-monitoring persisted over time, with blacks less likely to initiate self-monitoring, engage in intensive self-monitoring, and adhere to recommended standards of long-term self-monitoring compared to whites. In the third study, we used a novel approach to measure medication adherence, linking prescribing and pharmacy claims data to assess race differences in long-term adherence to hypoglycemic monotherapy in a fully insured, newly diagnosed diabetes population. Despite having equal access to services and quality of care, blacks were more likely to discontinue use of hypoglycemic therapy within six months of initiating treatment, and less adherent to long-term drug therapy than whites. These studies' findings suggest that early and continued emphasis in self-management practice, particularly for black patients, may be necessary to reduce persistent racial differences in self-management practice and clinical outcomes.


 
Darren Zinner
2006, Management
Current Position: Senior Research Associate, The Health Industry Forum; and Senior Lecturer, Heller School of Social Policy and Management
Current Employer: Brandeis University
Thesis Title: Essays on the Management of Clinical Trial Sites: Lessons for Health Policy, Technology Development, and Organizational Theory
Committee Members: Pisano, Huckman, McNeil
ABSTRACT: Changes in the costs and complexities of developing new pharmaceuticals have led to transformations in the clinical research industry. The influx of new types of research sites and principal investigators has created substantial differences in how clinical research studies are conducted and managed. This research thesis utilizes the homogeneity of clinical research tasks across sites, while exploiting the structural variation among these different types of investigative centers. Within a given trial, multiple investigators recruit identically eligible volunteers, enroll them into a common clinical protocol, and process them according to the same quality specifications. Yet, these sites differ in important organizational and demographic characteristics. Using proprietary benchmark data from biopharmaceutical sponsors and a clinical research services firm, I utilize multivariate regression analysis with protocol-level fixed effects to determine the characteristics that predict site-level clinical trial enrollment. My research is divided into three separate papers that seek to provide lessons for clinical research, health policy, and organizational theory. Paper one documents that conducting clinical research requires administrative focus and coordination, suggesting that managerial and organizational characteristics of investigative sites have a large impact on the final enrollment tallies. Thus, policies aimed at improving the productivity of the clinical development process, such as the National Institutes of Health’s Roadmap for Medical Research, should also focus on the managerial issues surrounding clinical research. Paper two uses geographic variation across trial sites to show that the uninsured are disproportionately enrolling in industry-sponsored clinical trials, confirming the existence of a hole in the nation’s safety-net provider system. Lastly, paper three seeks to inform the management of diversified firms by exploring the effect of operational focus on productivity. It finds that sites that focus on conducting clinical trials significantly outperform those that mix trial activity with the provision of traditional patient care. However, diversified sites that separate clinical trial activity and traditional patient care through a “plant-within-a-plant” structure achieve performance that is statistically equivalent to that of a fully focused site dedicated solely to clinical trials.


 
Sara Bleich
2007, Political Analysis
Current Position: Assistant Professor
Current Employer: Department of Health Policy & Management and Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Thesis Title: Obesity Policy and the Public
Committee Members: Murray, Adams, Blendon, Cutler
ABSTRACT:
Globally, obesity has reached epidemic proportions affecting more than 300 million adults. This dissertation focuses on adult obesity and uses several interdisciplinary methods to explore the intersection between public policy and obesity prevention/control.

The first paper is a longitudinal analysis of the primary drivers of the obesity epidemic in developed countries and the contributions of various markers of development to increased caloric intake. The results indicate that rising obesity is primarily the result of consuming more calories, and that the increase in caloric intake is associated with technological innovations such as reduced food prices as well as changing sociodemographic factors such as increased urbanization and increased female labor force participation.

The second paper uses propensity scores to examine the independent contributions of insurance status (e.g., Seguro Popular vs. uninsured) and health professional supply (e.g., number of doctors and number of nurses per 1000) on coverage of antihypertensive therapy among adults with hypertension in Mexico. The findings suggest that having Seguro Popular (SP) insurance is associated with higher rates of antihypertensive treatment and blood pressure control. Further, Seguro Popular may be most effective in areas with a high health professional to patient ratio. Finally, the results indicate that 3,381 cardiovascular deaths among the uninsured could potentially be avoided through enrollment in SP; approximately six percent of total cardiovascular mortality for the SP-eligible population in 2004.

The third paper uses multivariate regression analysis to assess public trust in scientific experts on obesity and its relationship to both awareness of nutritional recommendations and appropriate behavioral change. This paper also identifies those sociodemographic groups associated with high and low trust in scientific experts. The findings show that trust in scientific experts is the strongest predictor of public attention to nutritional recommendations from scientific experts; that public attention is significantly associated with weight-related behavior; that women and more educated individuals have significantly higher odds of trusting scientific experts; and that Hispanics and older individuate have significantly lower odds of trusting scientific experts.

While the focus and scope of each of these papers is quite different, they each share a common concern for improving our understanding of those factors which may contribute to or reduce the escalation of obesity and its related diseases.


 
Adam Block
2007, Economics
Current Position: Economist
Current Employer: The Joint Committee on Taxation
Thesis Title: The Diffusion of Medical Information in Hospitals, Patients and Physicians
Committee Members: Cutler, Choudhry, Newhouse, Rosenthal
ABSTRACT: Medical advancement is caused by the accumulation and dissemination of new scientific information. Patient diagnosis, medical treatment and health outcomes often depend upon the application of information at the hospital, patient and physician levels. This dissertation examines the impact of new clinical information at the hospital level, the impact of advertising information at the patient level and the utilization of quality care practices at the physician level.

The first paper examines the impact of the number of surgeries at a hospital on the application of new clinical information to hospital practices. Information acquisition is a fixed cost, but benefits accrue per surgery, therefore research adoption is more likely among hospitals performing more total surgeries. The cases of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and angioplasty during heart attack (PTCA) show that hospitals with more surgeries better adhered to the clinical literature. The data supports the hypothesis that there is more research adoption at high volume hospitals.

The second paper uses parameter estimates from survey, epidemiological and experimental data to model the costs and benefits of new users of anti-depressants due to direct to consumer advertising (DTCA) for the case of depression. This study shows that 94% of new anti-depressant use due to DTCA is from non-depressed individuals. However, the average health benefit to each appropriate new user is 63-fold greater than the average cost per treatment, resulting in a positive net benefit of over $72 million. The cost to benefit ratio of DTCA could be improved through better targeting of advertisements and higher quality treatment of depression.

The final paper examines the determinants of the undermanagement of osteoporosis after hip or wrist fracture in females over age 65. Using a retrospective cohort, I find that patients older than 90, and black patients were less likely than average to be treated for osteoporosis. Female prescribers were more likely than male prescribers to manage osteoporosis and bisphosphonate treatment before fracture was the best predictor of bisphosphonate treatment after fracture. Our findings highlight that prescribers of all experience levels, specialties and locations need to improve osteoporosis management after hip or wrist fracture.


 
Syeda Noorein Inamdar
2007, Management
Current Position: Assistant Professor
Current Employer: Department of Organization and Management, College of Business, San Jose State University
Thesis Title: Examining the Scope of Multibusiness Health Care Firms: Implications for Corporate Strategy, Management Control Systems and Performance
Committee Members: Kaplan, Edmondson, Newhouse, Pisano
ABSTRACT:
In the past two decades, multibusiness health care firms, also known as organized or integrated delivery systems, have grown through related horizontal and vertical expansion of business scope across the health care value chain. These firms, which provide the majority of health care services in the United States, exhibit tremendous variety in terms of their scope of business activities. Scope – defined as the breadth and type of businesses in which a firm chooses to compete – is central to a firm’s corporate strategy. Yet, empirical research on the corporate strategy of these organizations is nonexistent. This dissertation aims to contribute to the field of strategy and to the practice of management by using scope to characterize the corporate strategy of health care firms. Specifically, in three related papers, I develop a new taxonomy of corporate strategies, examine how executives create incremental economic value from owning multiple businesses and explore the role of management control systems in aligning strategy with structure. The unit of analysis, in all three papers, is the multibusiness health care firm.

In the first paper, I apply multivariate statistical cluster analysis to classify 796 firms into five mutually exclusive organizational configurations with unique scope characteristics, thus revealing a new taxonomy of corporate strategies: core service providers, mission based, contractor, health plan focus and entrepreneur. I relate these corporate strategies to financial performance and find that no single strategy leads in performance across different payer reimbursement conditions; instead, “fit” is observed where different strategies perform well under different conditions. In the second paper, I apply structural equation modeling to develop two statistical models representing the scope of businesses in health care firms. I use the models to relate scope, corporate-level strategic decision making and financial performance. I find that organizational scope explains from 9 percent to 13 percent of the variance in financial performance. Executives strategically use scope to enhance performance by establishing consistency or “fit” among scope of businesses, extent of centralization of decision making and payment methods. In the third paper, I use the case study method of theoretical replication to examine how two firms with different structures –centralized versus decentralized – use management control systems to implement a similar corporate strategy. I find significant differences in the areas of values, risk, reports, measures, advanced practices and use of information technology, a finding that offers theoretical and practical implications for using control systems to align corporate strategy with structure.


 
Melitta Jakab
2007, Economics
Current Position: Senior Health Financing Policy Analyst
Current Employer: Barcelona Office for Health Systems Strengthening , Division of Country Health Systems, WHO Regional Office for Europe
Thesis Title: An Empirical Evaluation of the Kyrgyz Health Reform: Does It Work for the Poor?
Committee Members: Newhouse, Field, Hsiao, Yip
ABSTRACT:
The Kyrgyz Republic is considered a reform pioneer among the countries of the former Soviet Union. To protect households from the financial impact of seeking health care, the Kyrgyz government introduced comprehensive reforms during 2001-04.

In the first chapter, I evaluated the 2001-04 reforms on patient financial burden taking advantage of its phased implementation using a difference-in-difference approach. The reforms were successful at containing the out-of-pocket payments for hospitalized patients. The difference-in-difference estimator of the reform effect was 400 soms (US$10), equivalent to 29% of the pre-reform out-of-pocket payments in reform oblasts. The reforms were particularly effective at limiting the financial burden among the poorest 40% of the population. At the same time, I observe spill-over effects for visits and outpatient drug purchases reversing the protective effect the reforms exerted for hospitalization. This trend was stronger for the non-poor than for the poor. Combining the distributional impact of public expenditures with the distributional impact of out-of-pocket payments, the reforms redistributed health care resources to the benefit of the poor.

In the second chapter, I examine the socio-economic distribution of informal payments to health care personnel. Price discrimination has been suggested as the model of pricing behavior for informal payments, but it has not been established empirically. I do not find evidence that the poor are less likely to pay informal payment to medical personnel than the non-poor. Conditional on paying, the poor pay 25% less than the non-poor although their per capita annual consumption is 50% less. Additionally, 32% of patients pay less co-payment than they should leading to a revenue loss equal to 43% of co-payment collections. I do not find evidence that the poor are more likely to receive these discounts than the non-poor. Receiving a co-payment discount is associated with a 27% increase in informal payments. Thus, discounts could reflect strategic revenue maximizing behavior as physicians attempt to re-capture informal payment lost after the introduction of the co-payment policy.

In the third chapter, I evaluate three approaches to the measurement of socioeconomic status in the absence of data on consumption or expenditure. I calculate the concentration index for health care visits and hospitalizations with each ranking variable. The choice of welfare indicator has a significant impact on welfare ranking and on the estimated degree of inequality in health service utilization. Based on the findings of this paper, the scale items I validate can be used in future equity-related research in the Kyrgyz Republic.


 
Ingrid Nembhard
2007, Management
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Health Policy and Management
Current Employer: School of Medicine - Public Health and School of Management, Yale University
Thesis Title: Organizational Learning in Health Care: A Multi-Method Study of Quality Improvement Collaboratives
Committee Members: Edmondson, Bohmer, Cleary
ABSTRACT:
Organizations that learn - consistently improving their processes and products by integrating new insights and knowledge - perform well in a changing environment. This premise has led to much theorizing about effective processes for promoting organizational learning. However, little empirical research has followed to guide organizations such as those in health care that have a need and desire to learn in order to overcome performance problems and absorb rapidly-changing knowledge. This dissertation aims to advance empirical research on organizational learning by examining the improvement efforts of health care organizations involved in quality improvement "collaboratives," organized programs in which teams from multiple institutions work to improve care around a specific topic.

Using survey, archival, interview and observation data from participants in four collaboratives sponsored by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, I first assess which features of collaboratives matter most for learning. I find that access to faculty experts knowledgeable about the specified topic and achieving improvement matters most. Second, I capitalize on the existence of collaboratives to investigate interorganizational learning in health care, a process that has received scant attention in the organizational learning and health care management literatures. I propose and test a model of interorganizational learning activity (ILA). Results show that team, organizational, collaborative and task characteristics all influence the use of ILA, which increases organizational improvement. Notably, collaborative identification and team functioning play important mediating and moderating roles, respectively.

Finally, I address the observation that engagement in improvement work beyond collaborative teams is necessary, and that barriers to collaboration for intraorganizational learning exist. I focus on one barrier: the differential status accorded to those in different professions. Survey data collected from another collaborative, Vermont Oxford Network, reveal that profession-derived status is positively associated with psychological safety - a key antecedent of engagement in improvement efforts. Moreover, results show leader inclusiveness - words and deeds exhibited by leaders that invite and appreciate others' contributions - helps overcome inhibiting effects of status differences.

Together, the findings offer insight into antecedents of and strategies for fostering intra- and inter-organizational learning, and ultimately improvement, in health care.


 
Khadija Robin Pierce
2007, Ethics
Current Position: Senior Research Fellow
Current Employer: Dalhousie University
Thesis Title: Setting Margins for Genetic Privacy
Committee Members: Schauer, Beck, Brandt
ABSTRACT: Advances in genetic technologies are creating greater opportunities for beneficial biomedical interventions. However, our increased understanding of the impact of genotype on phenotype, and the enhanced ability to derive information from a single individual about biologically related persons, gives rise to a range of ethical, legal, and social issues. Foremost among these issues is privacy. Regulating the dissemination of genetic information faces considerable challenges when potential individual and collective health benefits are weighed against individual privacy interests.

This work applies an interdisciplinary approach, drawing from law, philosophy, sociology, and history, to provide a contextual analysis of privacy interests and the optimal means of regulation. It makes the case for greater consideration of alternative approaches to codification of diminished individual privacy interests. Instead, it advocates increased use of social norms as a way of gaining the considerable positive benefits of genetic advancements without irreversibly sacrificing individual privacy rights.

Chapter 1 explores comparative approaches to unconsented disclosure of genetic test results to relatives. It offers a normative analysis of discretionary disclosure, a policy that would allow the disclosure of test results to relatives for whom there may be an elevated risk of disease. It concludes that this policy is problematic and, ultimately, counterproductive.

Chapter 2 examines shifts in privacy norms occasioned by the advances in genetic technologies and identifies a spillover effect in the form of the inadvertent emergence of new norms. This chapter introduces an original typology developed in response to these new norms regarding privacy. It focuses on the emerging practice of compelling access to genetic information of biologically-related persons in order to gain information about a particular individual. It concludes that greater attention should be given to the spillover effect and the emergence of “shadow norms”.

Chapter 3 explores the force of comparative privacy protections between selected European countries and the United States. I contrast Europe’s application of the proportionality principle with the U.S. model of categorical protections. Does the seemingly more flexible European approach provide lesser or greater protection than the U.S. categorical model? I conclude that architecture alone is not determinative.


 
Stephen Resch
2007, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Associate; Adjunct Lecturer on Health Policy and Management
Current Employer: Abt Associates; Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health
Thesis Title: Policy Modeling and Economic Evaluation of Tuberculosis Control
Committee Members: Weinstein, M Murray, Salomon
ABSTRACT: Tuberculosis (TB), a curable disease, kills nearly 2 million people annually. Approximately 80% of these deaths occur in 23 “high-burden” countries. The past decade has seen a rapid increase in efforts to reduce tuberculosis incidence and mortality through an expansion of TB control programs with financial support from international donors and technical assistance from the World Health Organization (WHO). This focus on tuberculosis has generated a need for the economic evaluation of alternative interventions for tuberculosis control. In this dissertation, mathematical models of tuberculosis are developed and simulation is used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of interventions to control tuberculosis. Chapter One assesses the cost-effectiveness of alternative strategies for treating multidrug-resistant TB in Peru. The use of individualized regimens of second-line anti-tuberculosis drugs among patients who have failed or defaulted from first-line treatment was found to be highly cost-effective when using per-capita GDP as a threshold cost per life-year gained. Chapter Two describes a model of tuberculosis epidemic in which TB control is conceived to consist of four sequentially connected components: program coverage, suspect recruitment, diagnosis, and treatment. Available resources for TB control can be distributed across these components. With a goal of minimizing deaths (and, alternatively, minimizing TB cases), the optimal allocation of resources across components for a given budget was estimated. In general, the optimal allocation of resources favors downstream program components (e.g., treatment) over upstream components (e.g., suspect recruitment). Results were compared to the World Health Organization’s stated implementation goals for TB control programs. Conventional tuberculosis control programs using the World Health Organization’s “DOTS” framework have not been sufficient for containing TB in high HIV-burden settings. In Chapter Three, a mathematical model of interacting epidemics of TB and HIV was developed in order to quantify the potential health gain from and cost of augmenting conventional TB control in South Africa. The model was calibrated to match epidemiological data from South Africa. Policy alternatives included specific approaches to improving case detection, diagnostic testing, and treatment, including those that target HIV-infected persons. Our analysis demonstrates that several feasible and efficient TB control strategies exist that are incrementally more intensive than current policy in South Africa. These strategies, if implemented, can be expected to contain drug-resistance and accelerate the decline in TB incidence and mortality that will occur under the status quo strategy, at costs that appear reasonable for a middle income country. These analyses together indicate that cost-effective interventions for TB control exist in low-to-middle income settings with high TB burden, even in the presence of high levels of anti-tuberculosis drug-resistance or HIV coinfection.


 
Hector Rodriguez
2007, Medical Sociology
Current Position: Assistant Professor
Current Employer: Department of Health Services, University of California, Los Angeles School of Public Health
Thesis Title: Continuity and Team Approaches to Care: Effects on Physician-Patient Relationship Quality, Patients’ Experiences, and the Technical Quality of Care
Committee Members: Cleary, Marsden, Safran
ABSTRACT: Team approaches to care are increasingly being considered critical to improving quality for patients with complex chronic conditions and for primary care practices in general. However, many studies demonstrate some benefit to structuring care so that individual provider visit continuity is a priority. The dissertation aims to better understand how various conditions influence team performance and the quality care delivered to patients.

Section 1 explores the effect of multidisciplinary primary care teams on patients' experiences with care. Higher physician continuity was associated with more favorable patients' experiences. An exception was patients' assessments of teams, which were better when on- vs. off team visits occurred. For other measures, the decrements associated with discontinuity were the same irrespective of whether discontinuities involved on- or off-team visits. The findings highlight the challenges of incorporating teams into primary care in ways that patients experience as value-added rather than disruptive to primary care relationships.

Section 2 clarifies whether visit continuity influences patients' experiences equally in various clinical situations. Physician-patient interaction quality and organizational access were more strongly influenced by visit continuity among respondents in early stages of a physician-patient relationship and with worse self-rated health. Visit continuity during early stages of a physician-patient relationship may ultimately increase the acceptability of approaches that leverage physician time.

Section 3 assesses which patient, physician, and organizational factors are related to voluntary physician switching among HIV-infected patients. Lower voluntary switching was predicted by patient trust, physician anti-retroviral knowledge, moderate (rather than low or high) HIV patient volume at a care site, and Ryan White Care Act funding. Patients with chronic illnesses may use several markers of specialization and technical quality to make decisions about their care.

Section 4 assesses the effect of care team composition on the quality of HIV care. In adjusted analyses, having a care team composed of three or more clinicians was associated with more consistent prescribing of Pneumocystis carinii (PCP) prophylaxis when medically-indicated. However, patients with multiple physicians generally reported worse care coordination and exhibited less appropriate use of emergency services. These findings highlight that team approaches offer a mix of advantages and disadvantages to patients.


 
Erica Seiguer Shenoy
2007, Economics
Current Position: Fellow in Infectious Disease
Current Employer: Massachusetts General Hospital; and Brigham and Women's Hospital
Thesis Title: Innovation and Incentives in Pharmaceutical Research and Development
Committee Members: Frank, Newhouse, Pindyck
ABSTRACT: Research and development (R&D) in the pharmaceutical industry requires significant investment over long periods of time, with uncertain outcomes. This dissertation examines the economics of innovation and incentives in pharmaceutical R&D. In Chapter 1, the peak revenue gains associated with order of entry as well as the peak revenue gains associated with molecule- and firm-specific characteristics for molecules launched in the United States over the 1994-2005 period are estimated. This research addresses whether or not a first-mover advantage can be demonstrated empirically, and thus sheds light on the economic incentives faced by firms as they choose which molecules to invest in and the amount of effort they dedicate to innovative R&D. The findings suggest that there is no first-mover advantage for the drugs in the sample, and that later entry to a class is associated with greater peak revenues. Molecule characteristics, however, are much more significant predictors of peak revenues than order of entry.

In Chapter 2, the impact of pre-market competition on success in pharmaceutical R&D is estimated using a discrete choice model.Using a large database of molecules in development from 1994-2004, and drawing from the literature on net present value, sequential development projects and real options, I consider the factors that explain molecule transitions through phases of development and examine how the pre-market competitive environment influences the probability that a molecule will move to the next stage. The parameter estimates suggest that the likelihood of a molecule transitioning is influenced by the successes and failures of other molecules in development, findings that are consistent with a model of learning.

In Chapter 3,the economic incentives for research and development of pharmacogenomic therapies are examined through simulations that compare the variables influencing the expected profits for firms considering investing in genomic-based therapies versus investing in non-targeted, or "conventional therapies." The findings suggest that firms face strong incentives to develop conventional therapies, which are more profitable in all of the simulations than targeted therapies. These findings, however, are most sensitive to market share and pricing, which suggest that factors influencing both could make targeted therapies more attractive investments to firms.


 
Emily Shortridge
2007, Medical Sociology
Current Position: Research Scientist
Current Employer: Department of Health Policy and Evaluation, NORC at the University of Chicago
Thesis Title: Gender and Health: The Influence of Psychosocial Factors on Health
Committee Members: Cleary, Ayanian, Marsden
ABSTRACT: The medical literature presents many examples of differences in health care use by men and women. However, the roots of these differences are complex, and include physiological and biological conditions, social factors, psychological states, as well as other causes. All of these conditions change over time, with changes in the milieu that occur with aging. This dissertation thesis consists of three papers that undertake to investigate the dynamic confluences that foster health care use. Paper 1 explores predictors of patient preferences for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), hypothesizing that in a nationally representative sample, men will report a greater preference for CABG than women. I find evidence that this is true, but that age interacts with gender, such that as women age, they become less and less likely to express a preference for CABG. Further, I am able to test whether preference for CABG predicts subsequent invasive heart surgery, and it does. What this suggests is that, if older women are appropriate candidates for CABG, they may arrive in the physician’s office with a bias against CABG. Physicians may need to present information differently to older women in order to ensure they consider all appropriate treatment modalities. Paper 2 examines propensity to report as a possible mechanism for some of the gender differences we see in reports of psychological and physical symptoms, health conditions, and chronic conditions. The paper considers whether somatosensory amplification, sensitivity to minor somatic sensations, is associated with changes in health status or health services use over a ten-year period. Somatosensory amplification is thought to reflect a propensity to report, and is more common in women. In the nationally-representative population that I study, I find evidence that women are more likely to amplify than men, but women’s score decrease with age. Respondents who develop a serious chronic illness report higher amplification scores over time, which may reflect more careful bodily monitoring. Although postmenopausal women may report unexplained medical symptoms to their clinicians, it does not appear that somatosensory amplification is a factor in these reports. Paper 3 also examines somatosensory amplification as a possible measure to improve Rose’s angina and dyspnea score reports. These scales predict clinically observable ischemic heart disease and death in men, though not in women. One possible hypothesis for this observed gender difference is that women amplify more, and thus may report higher levels of angina and dyspnea, which may influence the ability of these measures to predict mortality. Overall, controlling for amplification has little effect on angina and dyspnea. When I stratify by gender and include somatosensory amplification in the model, both angina and dyspnea scores remain significant predictors of mortality for men, but not for women. This supports the hypotheses that Roses’ angina and dyspnea scores do not calibrate well for women, perhaps due to reporting styles that women develop. Overall, this dissertation research provides several insights into the gender differences we see in health care use. Women and men have different preferences for certain types of treatments, which may influence whether or not they receive certain treatments. Women seem to have a propensity to report more, due to factors such as somatosensory amplification, but importantly, older women do not appear to amplify their medical condition reports. Further, among women, controlling for amplification affects reports of angina and dyspnea, and, significantly, high levels of amplification predict mortality in women.


 
Sara Singer
2007, Management
Current Position: Assistant Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management; Assistant Professor of Medicine; and Assistant in Health Policy, Institute for Health Policy
Current Employer: Harvard School of Public Health; Harvard Medical School; and Massachusetts General Hospital
Thesis Title: Safety Climate in US Hospitals: Its Measurement, Variation, and Relationship to Organizational Safety Performance
Committee Members: Edmondson, Baker, Marsden
ABSTRACT:
Patient safety problems remain common in healthcare organizations. Drawing on lessons from high reliability organizations, many assume that strengthening the culture of safety in hospitals will be required to reduce errors and improve patient outcomes. However, little empirical research has (1) characterized and measured perceptions of safety culture among hospital personnel (i.e., safety climate), (2) investigated important ways in which safety climate varies within hospitals, and (3) established a link between stronger safety climate and better safety performance at the organizational level.

Using survey data collected from more than 20,000 individuals in 105 US hospitals, Chapter 2 investigates elements of organizational culture that may impact patient safety in hospitals. I identify a valid and reliable nine-dimension “Patient Safety Climate in Healthcare Organizations” (PSCHO) framework for characterizing safety climate that places constructs into three groups, reflecting organizational, work-unit, and interpersonal contributions to safety.

Chapter 3 recognizes that safety climate may vary within organizations and that understanding variation can facilitate intervention. This research focuses on variation due to an individual’s place in an institution’s management hierarchy. PSCHO survey data confirms large and consistent perceptual differences among senior managers, supervisors, and frontline workers, with senior managers consistently the most positive and frontline workers the most negative. Differences by management level, however, depend on profession, age, and gender.

Chapter 4 undertakes unprecedented research by examining the link between stronger safety climate and better safety performance among hospitals. Drawing on the insight that multiple interacting organizational layers contribute to organizational safety culture, I hypothesize that dimensions related most closely to individuals’ behaviors will be most associated with indicators of organizational safety performance, and I find this to be the case. Building on evidence of large differences in safety climate perceptions by management level, I also find that perceptions of frontline workers relate to indicators of safety performance, but those of senior managers do not. In addition, perceptions of nurses relate to nurse-sensitive indicators while no such relationship exists between physicians’ perceptions and physician-driven indicators.

Together, findings offer insight into strategies for strengthening safety culture and ultimately for improving the quality and cost-effectiveness of healthcare delivery.


 
Kate Stewart
2007, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Researcher
Current Employer: Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
Thesis Title: Disability and Physical Functioning in the Elderly
Committee Members: Landrum, Berkman, Cleary, Cutler
ABSTRACT: Self-reported disability among the elderly population declined over the past 25 years. Since the share of elderly living with chronic disease increased and improvements in technologies and environments may have facilitated independence over this timeframe, it is likely that improved medical care and increased use of technologies and environments may explain some of the disability decline. The goals of this dissertation are to evaluate the relative importance of technologies and environments on disability survey responses, to investigate whether a new survey technique, anchoring vignettes, identifies systematic differences in self-reported disability, and to evaluate the impact of improved medical care on disability.

The first two papers are based on a new survey of 441 community-dwelling elderly conducted in the greater Boston area. The first chapter examines whether use of various technologies and environmental factors were important determinants of self-reported disability, conditional on objective measures of functioning. This study finds that a majority of respondents who used walking aids did not report disability walking around inside. In addition, increased use of van service, senior housing and ramps may explain up to 19% of the decline in disability grocery shopping between 1982 and 1999.

The second chapter explores whether anchoring vignettes, a new survey technique, identifies systematic differences in thresholds for reporting disability. We hypothesized that respondents who used various technologies and environments may have a higher threshold, i.e. lower propensity, to report disability compared to non-users. In models for walking around inside, we found that respondents using mobility assistance actually had lower thresholds for reporting disability and that random variation across respondents was an important determinant of survey responses.

In the third chapter, we use data from the National Long Term Care Survey, including Medicare-linked files, to evaluate whether improved treatment for acute myocardial infarction led to lowered disability and death among the elderly population over time. We find that increased use of invasive procedures was associated with improved survival and lower disability among survivors, and that increased use of beta-blockers were associated with improved survival. These findings suggest that improved medical care treatment led to greater survival and lower disability.


 
Erin Strumpf
2007, Economics
Current Position: Assistant Professor
Current Employer: Department of Economics and Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University
Thesis Title: Employment, Health Insurance, and Health Care for Vulnerable Populations: Early Retirees, Low-Income Adults, and Racial/Ethnic Minorities
Committee Members: McGuire, Cutler, Finkelstein, Swartz
ABSTRACT: In the first paper, I examine the potential consequences of the recent decline in employer-sponsored retiree health insurance (RHI) offer for the near-elderly population. I find than an RHI offer increases the probability of early retirement by 35 percent. While the results suggest that an RHI offer has little, if any, effect on health in the short term, there is strong evidence that it provides significant protection from high out-of-pocket medical costs. Estimates of the value of retiree health insurance suggest that increasing opportunities for the near-elderly to purchase coverage through the individual market or public programs could significantly reduce the projected increase in uninsurance.

In the second paper, I examine the impact of the introduction of the Medicaid program on labor force participation among single women. Using variation in the timing of Medicaid implementation across states and in eligibility across demographic groups, I find no evidence that women who were eligible for Medicaid decreased their labor supply relative to women who were not. These results add to an emerging consensus in the literature suggesting that public health insurance programs for low-income parents and children may be able to achieve health benefits and improve access to care without substantial indirect costs from labor supply distortions.

Racial/ethnic concordance between patients and physicians may affect health care disparities by reducing discrimination. In the third paper, I investigate the role of concordance on rates of preventive screening and the length of outpatient, primary care visits. I find little evidence that concordance plays an important role in these outcomes. Physician race tends to be a much more important predictor of these outcomes than patient race or concordance, but the direction of the effect varies. The results highlight the importance of measuring the role of concordance separately from patient and physician race. They also suggest that policies aimed at increasing the number of minority physicians need to be combined with other methods to improve the quality of primary care.


 
Justin Timbie
2007, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Associate Policy Researcher
Current Employer: RAND Corporation
Thesis Title: New Frameworks for Hospital Quality and Value Profiling
Committee Members: Normand, Newhouse, Rosenthal
ABSTRACT: The rapid expansion of payment models that incorporate information on individual providers' quality and efficiency of care has brought increasing scrutiny to performance measurement in health care. Summary measures of quality and value are integral components of pay-for-performance programs, but have also been used for settling patients' copayment levels, for regulation and accreditation purposes, and for studying the correlates and consequences of poor quality of care. Yet, by most accounts, these summary measures remain underdeveloped. In this dissertation, I describe new frameworks for estimating and comparing hospitals on summary measures of quality and value.

In the first chapter I introduce a method to profile hospitals on the "value" of care for acute myocardial infarction. Using estimates of society's willingness to pay for survival gains to express each hospital's survival benefit in dollars, I combine in-hospital survival and cost outcomes on the incremental net monetary benefit scale to compare the performance of 69 hospitals. While common in cost-effectiveness analyses of new technologies, this approach has not been applied to provider profiling. In the second chapter, I propose and compare three value estimators that make different assumptions about the relationship between cost and quality. The estimators include one based on a regression framework, the cost-effectiveness estimator from Chapter 1, and the prevailing technique used by health plans, which compares performance on both domains independently. I find significant differences in the set of hospitals classified as high value across methods, and recommend against using the most common approach. In the third chapter I present a framework for profiling hospitals using a summary measure of health status following coronary artery bypass graft surgery, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). I use eleven performance measures to predict two-year survival outcomes, and derive composite health utility estimates based on a patient's exposure to six potential surgical complications, which are used to weight survival time. I then assess differences in average quality-adjusted life expectancy over two years of follow up among 14 Massachusetts' hospitals. These frameworks provide general methods that are applicable to other conditions, and that can also serve as the basis for more detailed models.


 
Malcolm Williams
2007, Medical Sociology
Current Position: Associate Policy Researcher
Current Employer: RAND Corporation
Thesis Title: Individual, Clinical, and Contextual Factors Affecting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Quality
Committee Members: Cleary, Kawachi, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT:
Current research indicates that there are significant racial and ethnic disparities in the risk factors, incidence, and quality of care for several illnesses, including HIV disease. Although differences in the quality of HIV care are not fully understood, contributing factors may include problems in the physician-patient interaction due to lower trust in physicians among minority patients and racial and ethnic differences in access to facilities that generally provide the best HIV care.

In chapter one, we assessed the relationship between race and trust in four national datasets. In these analyses, only one dataset showed a substantial relationship between race and overall trust in physicians. Important racial differences were, however, found in responses to individual items related to the risk taking behavior of physicians ("risk trust") across datasets, potentially as a result of historic mistreatment of minorities.

In chapter two, we estimated the extent to which risk trust explains racial differences in HIV care. We found that such concerns do not mediate racial disparities in the quality of HIV care, but are an important determinant of adherence to antiretroviral medications. Risk trust not only predicts a patient's belief in the worth of these medications, but it may also have an independent effect on whether the patient is adherent.

Finally, in chapter three we evaluated whether the racial mix of patients at HIV sites of care determines the quality of care and mediates racial and ethnic disparities. We found that as the proportion of black patients at an HIV treatment site increases, the probability that a patient will receive highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) decreases after adjustment for patient race, age, gender, and CD4 cell count. However, the racial mix of patients at the site was unrelated to the receipt of HAART after adjustment for a number of other patient characteristics. This suggests that although the receipt of HAART is lower in sites with a high proportion of black patients, this difference is explained by other patient factors.




 
Jennifer Yeh
2007, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Post-doctoral Fellow, Harvard Education Program in Cancer Prevention Control
Current Employer: Harvard School of Public Health and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Thesis Title: Gastric Cancer Prevention Policy: The Economic and Population Impacts of Helicobacter pylori Screening
Committee Members: Goldie, Ezzati, Kuntz
ABSTRACT: Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths, with over 65% of all cases occurring in developing countries. Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection is the most important risk factor for gastric cancer and estimated to be responsible for 65 to 80% of all cases. Clinical trials suggest Hp treatment reduces disease progression, but the effectiveness of treatment to reduce long term outcomes, such as gastric cancer mortality, is uncertain. To assess the economic and population impacts of Hp screening, we developed a comprehensive simulation model of gastric cancer.

In Chapter 1 we describe the development and calibration of a natural history model of gastric cancer in the two high-risk countries of China and Colombia. Using a likelihood-based calibration approach, we identified multiple parameter sets that provided model outcomes consistent with epidemiological data on the prevalence of precancerous lesions and gastric cancer incidence in each country. The model is capable of evaluating the relative effectiveness of primary and secondary prevention efforts and reflecting the uncertainty surrounding disease progression on important policy outcomes.

In Chapter 2, we use the model to estimate the health and economic consequences associated with Hp screening in China, where over 40% of the world’s gastric cancer cases occur. We estimated that a once per lifetime screening program for 20-year olds may prevent as many as one in every four to six cancers and appears to be highly cost-effective given commonly used threshold heuristic. Given the ease of detecting and treating Hp infection and the poor prognosis and limited treatment options for gastric cancer, it may be reasonable to adopt a more proactive strategy while waiting for more evidence on the benefits of Hp treatment from the ongoing clinical trials.

In Chapter 3, we develop a population model of gastric cancer to project the impact of changing risk factor trends on gastric cancer incidence among men in China. We found that gastric cancer rates have declined as Hp prevalence has fallen, despite the rise in smoking. Even with the continued decline of Hp and smoking, we estimated that the number of new gastric cancers in 2030 will rise substantially as a result of population growth and aging. While targeted Hp reduction programs may prevent a proportion of these cancers, their impact on population gastric cancer risk will not be realized for several decades. Finding effective strategies for primary or secondary prevention of gastric cancer should be a public health priority.


 
Yuting Zhang
2007, Economics
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Health Economics
Current Employer: University of Pittsburgh, Department of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health
Thesis Title: Do Newer Prescription Drugs Pay for Themselves? Searching for Appropriate Empirical Methodologies
Committee Members: Frank, Huskamp, McGuire
ABSTRACT: Newer and more expensive drugs account for a large proportion of the recent rapid growth of prescription drug spending. However, if use of newer drugs can reduce spending in other medical services, it may save total healthcare costs (the "cost-saving effect"). Aggregate-level evidence of the cost-saving effect is supported by two well-cited studies conducted by Frank Lichtenberg. He argued that the use of new drugs reduces, on average, total healthcare costs. In Paper 1, I reassess this evidence and conclude the original findings do not sustain under plausible alternative approaches. Thus, we do not have robust evidence of the aggregate cost-saving effect.

Furthermore, wide variations in safety, efficacy and costs exist across drugs and diseases. In Paper 2, I investigate the cost-saving effect in one clinical area -- atypical antipsychotic agents compared with traditional mood stabilizers as long-term treatment for bipolar disorder. Using commercial insurance claims data from 1998-2001, I test the hypothesis through several econometric methods, including a propensity-score matching, interrupted time series, differencing strategies, and an instrumental variables approach. Each method can identify the cost-saving effect in a different way, but together they can serve as checks for robustness. I consistently find that the new medication does not reduce non-drug medical spending for patients with bipolar disorder.

Nevertheless, the cost-saving effect is plausible both theoretically and empirically. Cost-saving evidence is often shared across jurisdictions and used to guide decisions regarding the adoption and reimbursement of new drugs. However, variations in healthcare rationing policies may complicate the generalizability of such cost-saving evidence. In Paper 3, I propose an economic approach to generalizability of evidence on cost-saving effects for new prescription drugs across health systems with different rationing schemes. I note that the cost-saving effect depends on a new drug's effect on the relative prices of drug and non-drug medical inputs to health outcomes, as well as the substitutability between the two inputs. I also show that quantity constraints on non-drug treatments mainly decrease the cost-saving effect; and for some special cases, overall budgetary rationing reduces the cost-saving effect as well. This paper therefore demonstrates the importance of considering rationing schemes when applying cost-saving evidence across countries.


 
Rachel Garfield
2008, Political Analysis
Current Position: Assistant Professor, Department of Health Policy and Management
Current Employer: University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health
Thesis Title: Political and Fiscal Forces in State Health Policy
Committee Members: Frank, Blendon, Meara
ABSTRACT:
States play a crucial role in financing, administering, and delivering health services in the United States health care system. In recent years, state health policy has been the subject of debate, as states struggled to meet rising costs and growing need, sought increased flexibility in decision-making, and redesigned systems to keep abreast of changes in service delivery. This dissertation informs these debates by studying how state health spending, policy outcomes, and decision-making processes interact with state-level politics, economic conditions, and institutional structures.

The first paper uses unique panel data of state spending, politics, and demographics to analyze how state Medicaid spending responds to state fiscal crises and political factors. I find that, after controlling for need, state Medicaid spending changes are not related to state fiscal downturns, though overall state spending declines in these periods. Liberal ideology is a significant, positive predictor of annual changes in state Medicaid spending, while party control and the strength of health interest groups are not associated with short-term changes in state spending. The results suggest that state Medicaid spending follows a unique budget pattern within states.

Since the passage of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) in 1997, all states have expanded children’s eligibility for publicly-financed health coverage. The second paper investigates whether and how state economic conditions, politics, and need predict state choices in such coverage. It finds that pre-1997 eligibility was driven largely by political ideology and legislative control, as liberal states and states with Democratic legislatures had more generous eligibility criteria. Post-1997 changes in eligibility responded to the party of the governor, rather than legislature, and depended on state poverty levels but not annual budget fluctuations.

Complex dynamics in state mental health systems create tensions in state priority setting for mental health policy. The final paper uses qualitative evidence gathered through semi-structured interviews with state policymakers, advocates, and providers in four states to understand how policy priorities are set in state mental health policy. It finds that a combination of leadership, reliance on structured relationships, and reaction to outside actors or events characterizes priority setting in state mental health policy.


 
Jeremy Goldhaber-Fiebert
2008, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Decision Science
Current Employer: Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford Medical School
Thesis Title: Decision-Analytic Approaches to Evaluating Prevention Policy Alternatives
Committee Members: Goldie, Mullainathan, Salomon
ABSTRACT:
To achieve population health given uncertainty and budgetary constraints, policymakers must choose between interventions. We apply decision science to inform such decisions. We construct a microsimulation model of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer, developing empirical calibration procedures to translate disease natural history uncertainty into uncertainty about policy-relevant outcomes. The model evaluates U.S. cervical cancer prevention given newer screening technologies and HPV vaccines. We find: age-based screening differing from current guidelines appears cost-effective; vaccinating pre-adolescents is most beneficial; and all women should continue screening. Using simulation models calibrated to epidemiological data from low resource countries, we identify influential parameters in country-specific decisions about cervical cancer screening. Through fieldwork and internationally available data, we quantify the costs of achieving patient adherence, laboratory processing and specimen transport, and patient time seeking care. Including these costs influences the cost-effectiveness of screening alternatives. Focus on programmatic aspects of service delivery is relevant to chronic disease prevention worldwide. To inform vaccine policy for diseases such as measles, we consider methods that complement simulation models. While dynamic transmission models often require unavailable data, longitudinal regressions can identify determinants of vaccine coverage and reductions in mortality due to vaccination. We find that vaccine coverage depends on health worker availability and sustained program investment and that coverage is associated with substantial mortality reductions. This approach is relevant for many vaccine-preventable diseases.


 
Jaime Staples King
2008, Ethics
Current Position: Associate Professor of Law
Current Employer: University of California, Hastings College of the Law
Thesis Title: The Regulation of Individual Autonomy in Medical Decision-Making
Committee Members: Frank, Bartholet, Daniels, McGuire
ABSTRACT:
In the United States, federal and state governments affect medical decision-making through numerous direct and indirect channels. For instance, government intervention can enhance individual decision-making by ensuring a range of treatment options, protect individuals and society from harm by limiting treatment options, and encourage compliance with a preferred treatment plan. This dissertation examines government intervention in individual medical decision-making in three distinct areas of medical care.

Health services research raises significant questions about the fundamental assumptions of our informed consent laws. After finding that current informed consent laws fail to protect patients’ ability to make informed medical decisions, the first article analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of adopting shared medical decision-making as an alternative to current informed consent requirements. The article concludes that the long-term benefits of shared decision-making and the use of evidence based decision aids to promote patient understanding and inform medical decision making outweigh the costs for both patients and physicians.

Tension surrounding government intervention into the reproductive decisions of individuals has caused lawmakers in the United States to eschew attempts to regulate assisted reproductive technology, including reproductive genetic testing. Advances in genetic technology will soon enable parents to screen their embryos for hundreds of genetic and chromosomal characteristics through preimplantation genetic screening. While these advances promise significant benefits, they also present risks to both individuals and society. The second article proposes the creation of a federal regulatory body to license and monitor assisted reproduction and suggests a balancing framework for addressing conflicting stakeholder interests in reproductive genetic testing.

Mental health courts divert mentally ill offenders from the criminal justice system into court-ordered treatment. Since their creation a decade ago, mental health courts have continued to change court policies, practices and services to improve participant success. The third article first argues that the structure and characteristics of mental health courts facilitated this innovation. Next, it analyzes qualitative interview data on how seven mental health courts have changed since 2003 and the potential impact of those changes on client success and the courts’ capacity for future change. The article concludes that innovation remains key to mental health court success.


 
Joseph Ladapo
2008, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Clinical Fellow in Internal Medicine
Current Employer: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Thesis Title: Cost-Effectiveness of 64-Slice Computed Tomography in Cardiac Care and an Analysis of the Adoption and Diffusion of a New Technology
Committee Members: Gazelle, Cutler, Weinstein
ABSTRACT:
The 64-slice computed tomography (CT), a recent advance in radiological imaging, has the potential to significantly alter the landscape of cardiac care. As the first scanner with the ability to generate high-resolution images of the coronary arteries — a technique called coronary CT angiography — the device has simultaneously spawned both hope and controversy. Many physicians believe that its coronary imaging capabilities will improve clinical care, but others argue that the procedure raises cancer risk by exposing patients to high radiation doses and, by uncovering incidental findings, could lead to additional unnecessary diagnostic tests and costs. Evidence, however, is limited because of the technology’s novelty.

In this collection of studies, we address some of the uncertainty surrounding 64-slice CT by analyzing its cost-effectiveness in two important clinical scenarios: the triage of patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department, and the screening of patients with stable chest pain in the outpatient setting. We also examine the overall adoption and diffusion of 64-slice CT in the U.S. to better understand how hospitals manage new technologies with unclear implications for incremental health outcomes and costs.

We find that coronary CT angiography with the 64-slice CT may lead to more efficient triage of acute chest pain patients and could save money in patients with a low coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence. In undifferentiated patients presenting to their primary care physicians with symptoms suggestive of CAD, we find that coronary CT angiography yields modestly improved health benefits, compared to conventional diagnostic strategies. However, these results are sensitive to radiation risks and incidental findings. Finally, we find that hospitals that treat high volumes of ischemic heart disease patients — a population that could potentially benefit from coronary CT angiography — are more likely to adopt 64-slice CT, as are hospitals that are financially healthy. Our results suggest that the device’s adoption may be related to efforts to improve quality, but the paucity of evidence informing coronary CT angiography’s role in clinical care implies that quality-driven adoption may be premature. Moreover, our finding that adoption is motivated independently by the availability of capital reinforces concerns about haphazard technology acquisition.


 
Michael Law
2008, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Assistant Professor, Center for Health and Policy Research (beginning 2009-2010)
Current Employer: School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia
Thesis Title: Longitudinal Methods for Investigating Pharmaceutical Advertising, Adherence and Prior Authorization Policies
Committee Members: Soumerai, Adams, Swartz
ABSTRACT:
In this dissertation, I use longitudinal methods to investigate three pharmaceutical policy topics. The first paper examines the impact of direct-to-consumer advertising (DTCA) for four heavily marketed medications using a controlled, longitudinal time series design. We studied Canada — where there is substantial cross-border exposure to English US DCTA — and compared prescribing rate differences between predominantly English- and French-speaking provinces. The prescribing rate difference for three drugs (mometasone, tadalafil and zopiclone) did not increase after DTCA. In contrast, tegaserod prescriptions increased 42% in English-speaking provinces, but this effect did not persist over time. These findings suggest that DTCA campaigns may be relatively ineffective at increasing prescribing rates, but may be influential when drugs have advantages relative to existing therapies.

My second and third papers investigate atypical antipsychotic agents, a widely-used treatment for serious mental illnesses, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. The second paper investigates the temporal relationship between medication nonadherence and hospitalization risk for individuals with schizophrenia. We used a daily measure of medication availability and found individuals in the first 10 days following a missed prescription refill had an over 50% increase in hazard of mental health hospitalization and 77% increase in hazard of schizophrenia-specific hospitalization. Similarly, medication gaps of more than 30 days were associated with 50% increased hazard of hospitalization. These findings suggest clinicians and Medicaid programs might use pharmacy claims to target future adherence interventions.

Finally, the third paper examines the impact of Medicaid prior authorization programs for atypical antipsychotic agents, which have been implemented to reduce costs in more than 10 States. We used interrupted time series analysis to study the impact on market share of non-preferred agents and costs in West Virginia and Texas. These policies reduced market share for non-preferred agents by 14% in West Virginia and 3% in Texas. However, prior authorization did not decrease pharmacy reimbursements in either state. Further evaluation of the clinical consequences resulting from such policies is urgently needed to determine whether their potential clinical risks outweigh their limited cost impact.


 
John Michael McWilliams
2008, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Health Care Policy and Medicine
Current Employer: Harvard Medical School
Thesis Title: Effects of Insurance Coverage on Health Services, Outcomes, and Disparities among Adults with Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes
Committee Members: Zaslavsky, Ayanian, Meara, Swartz
ABSTRACT:
Previously uninsured adults who enroll in the Medicare program may have greater morbidity, requiring costlier care over subsequent years than they would if previously insured. In the first paper, propensity-score methods were used to compare self-reported health-care utilization and expenditures longitudinally from ages 55-72 for adults who were privately insured or uninsured before 65. Previously uninsured adults with cardiovascular disease or diabetes reported significantly greater use of services and higher total medical expenditures after age 65 than previously insured adults who were otherwise similar at age 59-60. Therefore, the costs of expanding coverage for uninsured near-elderly adults may be partially offset by subsequent reductions in health-care utilization and spending after age 65.

Uninsured near-elderly adults experience worse health outcomes than insured adults. However, the health benefits of providing insurance coverage for uninsured adults have not been clearly demonstrated. In the second paper, quasi-experimental analyses of longitudinal survey data were conducted to assess the effects of acquiring Medicare coverage on the health of previously uninsured adults. Relative to previously insured adults, previously uninsured adults, particularly those with cardiovascular disease or diabetes, reported significantly improved health trends after age 65 for a summary health measure and many component measures. Therefore, providing earlier health insurance coverage for uninsured adults with these conditions may considerably improve their health outcomes.

Efforts to improve management of cardiovascular disease and diabetes may or may not reduce disparities in clinical outcomes. Furthermore, the effects of Medicare coverage on these health disparities have not been conclusively demonstrated. In the third paper, serial cross-sectional data were used to assess recent national trends in disease control, trends in disparities in control, and changes in disparities after age 65 associated with near-universal Medicare coverage. Control of blood pressure, glucose, and cholesterol improved substantially since 1999, but racial, ethnic, and educational disparities persisted or widened, suggesting more focused efforts are needed to improve quality of care for disadvantaged groups. Where present, group differences in systolic blood pressure, HbA1c, and total cholesterol were smaller for ages 65-85 than ages 40-64. Thus, expanding insurance coverage before age 65 may reduce disparities in important health outcomes.


 
Jessica Mittler
2008, Medical Sociology
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Health Policy and Administration
Current Employer: Pennsylvania State University, Department of Health Policy and Administration
Thesis Title: Medicare Beneficiaries and Market Variations in Service Use, Quality of Care, and Plan Choice
Committee Members: Zaslavsky, Cleary, Landon
ABSTRACT:
Paper 1 examined relationships between an area’s intensity of service use and patient experiences, complementing research that showed markets with more intensive use of health care services did not have better technical quality of care or clinical outcomes. This analysis examined associations between a hospital referral region’s intensity of service use in Medicare fee-for-service and managed care with 8 measures of patient experiences with care from the 2003 Consumer Assessments of Healthcare Providers and Systems® surveys for Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older. Except for fee-for-service beneficiaries’ overall ratings of their personal physicians, Medicare beneficiaries in markets characterized by intensive service use did not report better experiences with care. This negative trend was strongest for managed care beneficiaries.

To realize potential benefits of coverage choices, Medicare beneficiaries must be aware of Medicare managed care. Paper 2 assessed relationships among beneficiary awareness of the managed care program and the number of Medicare risk plans, managed care penetration, and stability of plans in an area. Using 2002 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey data, we analyzed 9,277,952 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries never enrolled in Medicare managed care but had at least one plan available in their area. Having more Medicare risk plans available was significantly associated with greater awareness, and having an intermediate number of plans (2-4) was associated with more accurate knowledge of Medicare risk plan availability.

Clinical quality of care for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries is not better in markets where Medicare beneficiaries receive more intense treatment. To learn if a similar relationship exists in Medicare managed care, Paper 3 examined associations between intensity of service use across hospital referral regions and 11 clinical quality of care measures from the 2003 Medicare managed care Health Care Effectiveness Data and Information Set. Similar to fee-for-service, Medicare managed care beneficiaries in high-intensity markets had a lower likelihood of receiving beta blockers after heart attack, breast cancer screenings, colorectal cancer screenings, and appropriate treatments for depression or osteoporosis after a hip fracture than their counterparts in low-intensity markets. An exception was managed care beneficiaries with hypertension in high-intensity markets were more likely to control their blood pressure than those in low- intensity markets.


 
Janet Rosenbaum
2008, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Postdoctoral Fellow, Johns Hopkins Center for STD Research, Prevention, and Training
Current Employer: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health
Thesis Title: Reborn a Virgin: The Validity of Adolescent and Self-report of Risk Behaviors and the Efficacy of Abstinence Pledges as a Marker of Subsequent Sexual Activity
Committee Members: Zaslavsky, Cox, Rubin, Thompson
ABSTRACT:
Adolescents engage in many risky behaviors, such as smoking, substance use, and unprotected sexual activity, which jeopardize their current and future health. Adolescents may not report their risk behaviors accurately.

The first chapter examines inconsistent reporting of sex and virginity pledge histories in a one year time-frame in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health, n=13,568). More than half of wave 1 virginity pledgers denied at wave 2 having made a pledge; pledgers who initiated sexual activity were 3 times as likely to deny having made a pledge (odds ratio [OR]=3.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.04, 5.04). Among wave 1 nonvirgins who subsequently took virginity pledges, 28% retracted their sexual histories at wave 2; respondents who took virginity pledges were almost 4 times as likely as those who did not to retract reports of sexual experience (OR=3.88; 95% CI=1.87, 8.07).

The second chapter examines 72 risk behaviors in a reliability study of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (n=4619) administered at an interval of 2 weeks. It finds that adolescents report their sex and substance use most consistently, and weight control efforts least consistently, possibly due to the different salience of these activities for adolescents.

The third chapter examines whether the sexual behavior and birth control use of virginity pledgers differs from that of non-pledgers. Prior studies use parametric methods which may not adequately adjust for pre-pledge differences between pledgers and non-pledgers. This paper uses exact and nearest-neighbor caliper matching to create a control group of non-pledgers (n=645) comparable to pledgers (n=289) matched on over 100 pre-pledge factors. Five years post-pledge, 84% of pledgers denied having ever pledged. Pledgers and matched non- pledgers did not differ in premarital sex, STDs, anal, and oral sex. Pledgers had 0.1 fewer past year partners but the same number of lifetime sexual partners and age of first sex. Fewer pledgers than matched non-pledgers used birth control and condoms in the past year, and birth control at last sex.




 
Eileen Sandberg
2008, Decision Sciences
Current Position:
Current Employer:
Thesis Title: The Health-Related Quality of Life of Children Ages 7-10 with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and the Cost-Effectiveness of Treating ADHD in These Children
Committee Members: Weinstein, Neumann, Prosser, Thompson
ABSTRACT:
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) causes chronic impairments in attention and hyperactivity in an estimated 3-7% of U.S. children, but its impact on their health-related quality of life, and the cost-effectiveness of treatments for ADHD, have not been well characterized. Chapter 1 describes an Internet-based survey using a convenience sample of 113 parents with children ages 7-10 years with combined-type ADHD. The survey measured ADHD severity by the Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham (SNAP-IV) index, and included the parent proxy version of the Health Utilities Index (Mark 3) (HUI-3) to assess the impact of combined type ADHD on the health-related quality of life. We assessed the context validity of the HUI-3 in ADHD, and used a linear regression model to predict the HUI-3 score. The results of this analysis show that ADHD causes significant impairment in the health-related quality of life of children ages 7-10 years. In Chapter 2, we used the linear regression equation to predict the HUI-3 scores for a sample of children treated in a large randomized clinical trial, the Multimodal Treatment of ADHD (MTA). Using the data from the predictive model and the MTA results, we estimated the incremental costs (in 2006 U.S. dollars) and effectiveness (in quality-adjusted life years, QALYs) of four treatment modalities: standard methods for community care, behavioral treatment, managed medication, and the combination of managed medication and behavioral treatments. The results show that carefully managed medication appears highly cost-effective compared to community care (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $3,300/QALY). Behavioral treatment and combination treatment are dominated in comparison to managed medication, even for the patients with multiple comorbid illnesses in addition to ADHD. Carefully controlled management of medication remained cost-effective at the cost of newer medications currently on the market. Finally, Chapter 3 compares the utility scores derived from the HUI-2 and HUI-3 in children with ADHD. Consistent with prior research, we found lower derived utilities from the HUI-3 than from the HUI-2. Scale differences account for 60% of the difference between the two versions of the HUI. Our results suggest that the HUI-3 provides more sensitivity to the health-related quality of life decrements associated with more severe levels of ADHD symptoms.


 
Gillian SteelFisher
2008, Political Analysis
Current Position: Research Scientist and Assistant Director
Current Employer: Harvard Opinion Research Program
Thesis Title: From the Iraq War to Quality of Care: Public Response to Health Policy and Politics
Committee Members: Blendon, Schneider, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT:
The public’s perspective is a critical component of effective health policy. It provides the insights necessary to develop policies that are politically feasible as well as those that will truly benefit the public’s health. To that end, this dissertation examines the perspective of relevant publics for two different types of policies: those related to Army personnel and those related to public dissemination of comparative quality information about health care plans and providers.

Paper 1 examines problems pertaining to the health and well-being of Army spouses during extensions of deployment, using 2004 survey data. Controlling for demographic and deployment characteristics, we found that spouses who experienced extensions fared worse on an array of measures, including mental well-being (e.g., feelings of depression) and household strains (e.g., problems with household and car maintenance). This suggests that extensions may exacerbate problems related to deployment.

Paper 2 uses national opinion surveys to evaluate proposed disparities in access to and use of comparative quality information. We found that racial/ethnic minorities, those with lower incomes, and those who lack health insurance are less likely to see comparative quality information. Those in rural communities, those with lower incomes and those without insurance are less likely to use the information. Unexpectedly, we also found that among those who have seen comparative quality information, racial/ethnic minorities, those with low income, and those without insurance are more likely to use comparative quality information about hospitals or doctors than their counterparts.

Paper 3 evaluates barriers to seeking and using comparative quality information in context by examining the experiences of women choosing an obstetrician in Massachusetts. Qualitative interviews revealed evidence of barriers identified in the literature: those related to the materials (accessibility); to features of health care decision-making (low salience and immediacy of medical concerns); and to consumer values (mistrust of institutional experts, disconnect with concept of quality, and competing priorities). We also identified a barrier not previously recognized: patients believe they can judge clinical quality without formal information. Patients who were confident in their information seeking and use skills were able to overcome many of these barriers.




 
Anne Steffenson
2008, Medical Sociology
Current Position:
Current Employer:
Thesis Title: Toward a Better Understanding of HIV Risk among Young South Africans: Risk Perceptions and the Risk of Concurrent Sexual Partnerships
Committee Members: Cleary, Blendon, Seage
ABSTRACT:
South Africa is in the midst of a severe HIV epidemic and prevention efforts to date have had only limited success. The aim of this dissertation is to provide insight into behavioral and attitudinal dynamics that continue to support the spread of the virus, particularly those that may not be adequately addressed in current prevention efforts. All three papers use data from a nationally representative, household HIV survey conducted among 15-24 year olds in South Africa.

The first paper explores the HIV risk associated with concurrency or overlapping sexual partnerships. It finds that concurrency is associated with increased risk for HIV infection among women, but not men, after controlling for key demographic characteristics, risk factors, and sexual health characteristics. The findings underscore the need for frank, concerted messages about fidelity and highlight the need to address contextual issues such as poverty, unemployment, and gender power inequities.

The second and third papers focus on the perceptions of risk that mediate high risk sexual behavior. Virtually all behavioral theories view perceived risk as a principal motivation for behavior change. The second paper explores which risk behaviors are associated with heightened perceived risk and finds that, among women, older sexual partners, multiple partners, and concurrency were not associated with perceived risk for HIV. These findings suggest gaps in current prevention messages and efforts.

The third paper explores whether perceptions of risk are associated with HIV infection. It finds that among young men, but not young women, perceptions of risk are associated with HIV infection after controlling for demographic characteristics, risk behaviors, and sexual health characteristics. The findings suggest that in the context of voluntary counseling and testing, asking young men about their perceived risk of infection could help clinicians and others identify those most in need of testing and counseling. The fact that perceptions of risk and HIV infection are not associated among young women suggests that opt-out HIV testing may be a more appropriate testing model for South Africa.


 
Karen Grepin
2009, Economics
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Global Health Policy
Current Employer: NYU, Robert F. Wagner School of Public Service
Thesis Title: Influencing Health Systems: Priorities, Policies, and Providers
Committee Members: Cutler, Chandra, Field
ABSTRACT:
In my first paper, I explore the effects of donor financing for HIV/AIDS on health service delivery in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Using disaggregated data on health development assistance and multiple measures of heath service coverage, I analyze the effect of HIV/AIDS funding on the delivery of non-targeted health services from 1990-2006. I find evidence that in the short-run funding for HIV/AIDS is associated with lower coverage of immunizations and other health services and that these effects are strongest in countries with the lowest density of doctors per capita. These findings support the view that HIV/AIDS programs have not strengthened health systems and may have had unintended effects on non-targeted health services in SSA.

In my second paper, I evaluate the effect of user fees on the utilization of maternity services in Ghana. User fees reduce demand for health services but are an important source of revenue and provide incentives to health care providers in developing countries. In 2003, Ghana introduced a delivery fee exemption policy, initially rolling the policy out to 4 regions, creating a natural experiment to evaluate the effect of user fees on health service coverage. I find that this policy was effective at increasing the proportion of births supervised by trained medical professionals and delivered in facilities but that the policy may have had an adverse effect on the quality of services delivered. The delivery fee exemption policy was successful at targeting services to pregnant women and may represent an effective strategy where other forms of targeting are more difficult to implement.

In my third paper, I explore the determinants of recent Canadian Physician (CP) migration, by conducting a longitudinal analysis of recent migrants. I find that Canadian trained physicians were less likely to outward migrate and more likely to return home and that many of the departures seen during the 1990s were actually temporary. These findings suggest that, among other factors, additional education and training opportunities abroad may have accounted for a large share of outward migrations seen during the 1990s.


 
Jonathan Kolstad
2009, Economics
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Health Care Management
Current Employer: The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
Thesis Title: Essays on Information, Competition and Quality in Health Care Provider Markets
Committee Members: Cutler, Huckman, Athey
ABSTRACT:
In the first chapter, I consider the welfare economics of firm entry when input supply is not perfectly elastic. Prior studies suggest that with elastically supplied inputs, free entry is likely to lead to an inefficiently high number of firms as entrants “steal” business from incumbents. When firms face input scarcity, however, the welfare loss from free entry is reduced. Further, free entry may increase use of high-quality inputs, as oligopsonistic firms underuse these inputs when entry is constrained. I assess these predictions empirically by examining how the 1996 repeal of certificate-of-need (CON) legislation in Pennsylvania affected the market for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in the state. Within a few years after the repeal of CON legislation, the number of CABG facilities increased 46 percent. Consistent with theory, I show that entry led to a redistribution of surgeries from lower- to higher-quality surgeons. Under a reasonable set of assumptions, I find that the value of the improved outcomes due to this redistribution offset between 42 and 100 percent of the additional fixed costs incurred by new entrants.

In the second chapter I consider a model of suppliers who are motivated by a desire to perform well in addition to profit. If profit maximization is the only objective of a firm, new information about quality should affect firm behavior only through its effects on market demand. In the alternate model, performance data can alter both pecuniary incentives (i.e. extrinsic motivation) and incentives unrelated to profit (i.e. intrinsic motivation). The introduction of quality “report cards” for cardiac surgery in Pennsylvania provides an empirical setting to test for an effect of new information on quality (mortality) and to isolate the relative role of extrinsic (demand side) and intrinsic (supply side) incentives in determining surgeon response to new information. Using a structural demand system, I estimate the profit incentives facing each surgeon from the introduction of report cards. Extrinsic incentives due to quality reporting led to a .09 percentage point (three percent) decline in mortality. Consistent with a mixed model of objectives, information on performance that was new to surgeons and unrelated to patient demand led to an intrinsic response three times as large as surgeon response to profit incentives.

The third chapter measures the response of consumers to different information sources when choosing health care providers. In the absence of public “report cards” consumers can rely on market based mechanisms such as provider reputation, private reporting (e.g. US News and World Report) or the advice of a referring physician agent or their insurance plan. Such market based learning may be a substitute or complement for publicly released quality information. I estimate a model of consumer demand for surgeon quality (mortality) that integrates unobserved insurance network constraints, agency, U.S. News and World Report rankings and proxies for hospital reputation. Prior to formal information release, market based learning explains almost all of the consumer response to surgeon quality. After public information release demand for high quality surgeons increases relatively. I find that market based learning either substitutes for or is unaffected by public reporting. In particular, a U.S. News and World report ranking reduces consumer response to surgeon quality. Hospital reputation and agency show little differential impact on demand for quality after public reporting.


 
Katy Backes Kozhimannil
2009, Evaluative Science & Statistics
Current Position: Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Department of Population Medicine
Current Employer: Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
Thesis Title: Improving Maternal Health Services: Characterizing Risks and Measuring Program and Policy Impacts
Committee Members: Adams, Huskamp, Soumerai, Harlow
ABSTRACT:
This dissertation characterizes the relationship between two common perinatal conditions and measures effects of specific programs and policies on prenatal and delivery services (in the Philippines) and maternal mental health care (in the United States).

The first paper examines the impacts of a national health insurance program and a franchise of midwife clinics on achievement of minimum standards for prenatal and delivery care in the Philippines using data from Demographic and Health Surveys. Scale-up of the insurance program was associated with increased odds of receiving 4 prenatal visits, including care in the first trimester of pregnancy. Exposure to midwife clinics did not affect prenatal outcomes. While both programs were associated with slight increases in the odds of delivery in a health facility, these were not statistically significant. Expansion of an insurance program was associated with increases in achievement of minimal standard prenatal care among Filipina women.

The second and third papers use claims data from New Jersey’s Medicaid program and focus on maternal mental health among low-income women. The second paper characterizes the association between diabetes and depression during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Women with diabetes compared with those without diabetes had nearly double the odds of experiencing depression during the perinatal period. A similar relationship was shown among women with no indication of depression during pregnancy. Pre-pregnancy or gestational diabetes was independently associated with perinatal depression, including new onset of postpartum depression.

The final paper investigates the effects of New Jersey’s statewide postpartum depression initiative on mental health care following delivery. Interrupted time series and patient-level longitudinal models are used to estimate policy impacts on initiation, follow-up, and receipt of guideline-consistent depression care. Fewer than 7% of mothers initiated treatment in the 6 months following delivery. Of those who initiated care, 60% received some follow-up, and less than half received guideline-consistent care. There were no policy-associated changes in the level or trends for treatment initiation or follow-up, but there was an increasing trend in receipt of guideline-consistent care following implementation. Postpartum depression is under-recognized and under-treated among low-income women.


 
Manoj Mohanan
2009, Economics
Current Position: Assistant Research Professor, Duke Global Health Institute, Department of Economics, Department of Community and Family Medicine
Current Employer: Duke University
Thesis Title: Three Essays on the Effects of Health Shocks
Committee Members: Cutler, Field, Newhouse
ABSTRACT:
This dissertation examines the effects of health shocks on a variety of individual and household-level outcomes. Chapter 1 attempts to estimate the causal effects of health shocks on household economic outcomes using a quasi-experimental study design, comprising exogenous shocks sustained as bus accident injuries in India and matched unexposed drawn from travelers on the same bus routes. I find evidence of partial consumption smoothing with some negative effect on education, but no effect on food consumption. Debt was the principal mechanism used by households to mitigate effects of the shock, leading to significantly larger levels of indebtedness among the exposed. This evidence draws attention towards costly mechanisms adopted by households to smooth consumption.

Chapter 2 relies on data collected as part of the same Karnataka study and seeks to understand causal relationships underlying comorbidity in physical and mental health. I find that exposure to this acute negative health event increases psychological distress by 1.5 standard deviations on the distress scale one year later. Physical Disability acts as a key mediating mechanism, accounting for 65% of the total observed effect. Indebtedness resulting from health shock did not mediate the observed association between the exposure and distress levels. Physical health events, especially acute conditions that are associated with increased disability levels, have large and significant causal effects on mental health over one year later.

In Chapter 3, I examine the consequences and predictors of onset of chronic conditions in the United States using data from 8 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). I find that onset of major chronic conditions increases out of pocket expenses by about $2500 in the subsequent wave. Over the 14 year period spanning the 8 waves, the cumulative financial losses associated with a major onset in the second wave is over $68,000. I also find evidence of large reductions in the probability of working following major onsets. Further, I also find that changes in stock wealth as well as baseline asset levels are negatively associated with probability of major onsets of illness, suggesting that baseline SES levels can influence future health outcomes.


 
Rebecca Anhang Price
2009, Medical Sociology
Current Position: Behavioral Scientist
Current Employer: National Cancer Institute
Thesis Title: Adoption of New Medical Technologies: The Case of Cervical Cancer Prevention
Committee Members: Cleary, Frank, Goldie
ABSTRACT: New medical technologies have the potential to improve health outcomes substantially and cost-effectively, if used appropriately. This dissertation uses the context of cervical cancer prevention to investigate factors associated with adoption of new medical technologies and to assess their effects on health outcomes. Paper one is a longitudinal analysis of the factors associated with adoption of the human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA test for cervical cancer screening in a Medicaid population. Although Black and Hispanic women were initially less likely than White women to receive HPV DNA tests, disparities resolved within the test’s initial five years on the market. Obstetricians/gynecologists were more likely to use the tests than were primary care providers. These results suggest that uptake of new medical technologies can occur quickly among underserved groups, and may be bolstered by early adoption by specialists. Paper two is a difference-in-differences analysis of the effects of clinical guidelines and a targeted direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising campaign on overall and appropriate use of HPV DNA tests among privately insured women nationwide. DTC advertising was associated with increases in overall use of the HPV DNA test, while clinical guidelines were differentially associated with appropriate use. These findings suggest the potential for complementary applications of consumer marketing and professional guidelines to promote appropriate use of underutilized medical technologies. Paper three simulates the effects of cervical cancer prevention policies on health outcomes in the overall population, as well as among Black and Hispanic women, who are at higher risk of cervical cancer. Several strategies, including more widespread use of screening and school-entry mandates for HPV vaccines, have the potential to reduce incidence and mortality from cervical cancer in the US substantially. Screening policies stand to benefit Hispanic women more than vaccine promotion policies. Continued differential uptake of the HPV vaccine across race and ethnic groups may result in a widening of disparities in cervical cancer outcomes between White and minority women. These findings highlight the importance of considering subgroup differences when assessing the potential effects of new medical technologies on health outcomes.


 
Carrie Thiessen
2009, Ethics
Current Position: Resident in General Surgery
Current Employer: Yale-New Haven Hospital
Thesis Title: Forbidden Harms and Permissible Benefits: The Moral Status of Third Parties in Clinical Research
Committee Members: Daniels, Emanuel, Swartz, Wikler
ABSTRACT:


 
Andrea Ault-Brutus
2010, Medical Sociology
Current Position: Postdoctoral Fellow
Current Employer: Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School
Thesis Title: Examining Changes in Mental Health Care by Race/Ethnicity: 1990-1992 to 2001-2003
Committee Members: McGuire, Alegria, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT:
Using data from the 1990-1992 National Comorbidity Survey (Time 1) and the 2001-2003 National Comorbidity Survey – Replication (Time 2), this dissertation examines changes in mental health care among individuals with a 12-month mood and/or anxiety disorder by race/ethnicity.

Paper 1 assesses trends in White-Black and White-Latino disparities in the use of any mental health care and minimally adequate mental health care. Disparities in the use of any mental health care increased over time, particularly between Whites and Blacks in the general medical (GM) sector and between Whites and Latinos in the specialty mental health sector (SMH) sector. Disparities in the use of minimally adequate mental health care persisted between Whites and Blacks over time, but were not detected between Whites and Latinos in either time period.

Paper 2 examines the role socioeconomic status (SES) plays in changes in White-Black and White-Latino disparities in mental health care. The Institute of Medicine definition of racial/ethnic disparities recognizes the contributing effect of SES to racial/ethnic disparities in health care. Using two different sets of analyses, one where we control for SES and one where we do not, we found that controlling for SES did not influence racial/ethnic disparity estimates at both time periods, nor did it influence how these disparities changed over time.

Paper 3 examines whether racial/ethnic differences in perceived need and perceived barriers to mental health care help explain White-Black and White-Latino disparities in the use of mental health care. In Time 1, Blacks and Latinos were similar to Whites in perceiving a need for mental health care. Among those with perceived need at Time 1, no disparities in the use of care existed. In Time 2, Blacks and Latinos were once again similar to Whites in perceiving need. However at Time 2, racial/ethnic disparities in the use of mental health care emerged among those with perceived need. Among those with perceived need who did not receive care, Blacks and Latinos were more similar to Whites than they were dissimilar in endorsing a perceived barrier to care, with only a few exceptions in either time period.


 
Jonathan Clark
2010, Management
Current Position: Assistant Professor, Department of Health Policy and Administration
Current Employer: Pennsylvania State University
Thesis Title: 'Everything for Everybody'? An Examination of Organizational Scope in the Hospital Industry
Committee Members: Huckman, Christensen, Kane
ABSTRACT:
In light of contemporary characterizations of the American hospital as an “everything for everybody” institution, this dissertation examines organizational scope in the hospital industry through the lens of the patient problems hospitals address.

Following an introductory chapter, in chapter two I examine the emerging perspective that the optimal design of health care organizations depends on the specific characteristics of patient conditions. I do so specifically by examining whether the efficiency benefits of volume (scale) and operational focus (scope of services) depend on the degree of patient comorbidity. Using data from a sample of U.S. hospitals, I find evidence that the average efficiency benefits of volume and focus are diminishing in the level of patient comorbidity.

In chapter three I examine the relationship between operational focus and performance in cardiovascular care, taking into consideration the frequent comorbidities cardiovascular patients have. Drawing on corporate research on related diversification and distinguishing between direct and complementary spillovers, I examine the extent to which the marginal quality benefits of focus in cardiovascular care depend on the degree to which a hospital “co-specializes” in related—based on the frequency of comorbidity—areas (complementary spillovers). The results provide evidence of such complementarities in hospital specialization.

In chapter four I draw on complex systems theory to examine overall patterns of comorbidity in light of the complementarities found in chapter three. Specifically, I conceptualize comorbidity as a network of disease in which network ties are determined by the frequency of co-occurrence. I explore this system using the tools of network analysis and draw two conclusions. First, comorbidities among hospital patients exhibit clear patterns, which may be characterized with a “core/periphery” structure. Second, clustering patterns in the network suggest that even for conditions where comorbidities suggest a broader scope (such as cardiovascular disease), the optimum likely stops short of “everything for everybody” organizations.

Chapter five concludes the dissertation with some thoughts about the implications of the research presented for existing health care organizations, and possible future areas of inquiry.


 
John Connolly
2010, Political Analysis
Current Position: Senior Policy Analyst, Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured
Current Employer: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
Thesis Title: Ensuring the Health of Vulnerable Populations in the United States: Intersections of Politics and Public Policy
Committee Members: Blendon, Gay, Zaslavsky
ABSTRACT:
This dissertation examines two major health policy issues in the United States: the nature of public attitudes about expanding health insurance coverage and the health-related challenges of vulnerable communities during major hurricane threats.

Paper 1 uses national survey data to assess the relative influences of people’s political ideology and economic self-interest on public opinion about the 2007 reauthorization of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and universal health insurance. Data are from national surveys conducted during the 2007 SCHIP reauthorization debate and immediately after the 2008 presidential election. I compare the characteristics of public opinion regarding these two issues and find that ideological orientation and partisan identification had strong influences on Americans’ views about both policies, a common finding in studies of Americans’ views about policy issues. However, self-interest also had a considerable effect on older Americans’ views about these health insurance expansions, and the influence of self-interest among seniors appears to have had implications in the ongoing national debate about health reform as Medicare spending reductions have become a central topic of public discussion.

Paper 2 examines racial disparities in health-related difficulties during major hurricane threats in the Southern United States. I identify several specific problems that African Americans are more likely to face in these situations, and I assess which individual-level factors chiefly contribute to these disparities. The data for this investigation are from a 2007 survey of all coastal counties from North Carolina to Texas, including the areas affected by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The results demonstrate that evacuation behavior, receipt of safety information, chronic illness and disability, housing, and socioeconomic status all contributed to racial disparities. These findings should inform future emergency management policies and planning in order to mitigate these health threats among African American communities.

Paper 3 reexamines the effect of self-interest on public opinion about health policy issues and investigates the possibility that meager self-interest effects found in previous research may have resulted from the manner in which these studies have defined self-interest. The analysis also explores the potential moderating effects of the unique political and economic conditions of 2008 on the influence of self-interest. Data for this paper are from a survey of residents of Florida and Ohio, two swing states in which many residents felt the earlier effects of the most recent economic recession. The results indicate that multiple measures of self-interest, including a previously unused measure regarding difficulties paying medical bills, had statistically significant and sizeable effects on attitudes about universal health insurance. The new measure of self-interest and the economic and political environment of 2008 may explain these relatively unique findings.


 
April Kimmel
2010, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Postdoctoral Associate
Current Employer: Weill Cornell Medical College, Department of Public Health
Thesis Title: Efficiency and Equity Concerns for HIV Treatment Scale-up in Developing Countries
Committee Members: Weinstein, Daniels, Goldie, Prosser
ABSTRACT: HIV disease, a life-threatening but treatable illness, kills approximately 2 million individuals annually and about 2.7 million new infections occur each year. Developing countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, contend with a disproportionate burden of this disease, with approximately 40% of HIV-infected individuals residing in these settings receiving treatment. While recent international initiatives to combat HIV/AIDS suggest HIV treatment provision will continue to increase, the magnitude of the HIV/AIDS epidemic and recent global financial crisis places the financial, human, and physical capacity needs for HIV treatment provision in question. In this context, this dissertation seeks to examine efficiency and equity concerns for HIV treatment scale-up in developing countries. Three distinct methodologies were used to evaluate HIV treatment programs and policies in two sub-Saharan African countries, Côte d’ Ivoire and South Africa. Chapter 1 assesses the incremental benefits and cost-effectiveness of laboratory monitoring to guide switching antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected individuals in Côte d’Ivoire. CD4 count and HIV RNA monitoring to guide switching was found to improve survival and, under most conditions, to be cost-effective according to international standards. Chapter 2 describes development of a framework capable of quantifying the relative preferences of South African decision makers for alternative HIV treatment programs. Intended also to relate relative preferences to different ethical considerations, the framework systematically outlines a multi-stage, iterative process to develop a discrete choice experiment. The final process included identification of initial candidate priorities, collection and analysis of primary qualitative information to further isolate contextually relevant antiretroviral program characteristics, definition of characteristics that reflect treatment priorities for HIV-infected South Africans and different ethical principles, and survey instrument design. In Chapter 3, a mathematical programming model was developed to highlight the trade-offs among competing treatment policy goals of improving individual health outcomes, population health outcomes, and the number individuals receiving treatment. In evaluating one treatment area — treatment discontinuation after antiretroviral failure — in the context of Côte d’Ivoire, model results confirm that at the individual level, treatment discontinuation decreases life expectancy and treatment resource consumption. At the population level, however, treatment discontinuation generally increased population life expectancy and the number receiving treatment.


 
Lucy MacPhail
2010, Management
Current Position: Assistant Professor of Health Policy and Management
Current Employer: Robert F. Wagner School of Public Service, New York University
Thesis Title: Work Process Failure and Organizational Learning in Health Care Delivery Settings
Committee Members: Edmondson, Battilana, Marsden
ABSTRACT:
This dissertation examines behavioral influences on the emergence and management of work process failure in health care delivery organizations. In three chapters, I explore relational and institutional factors in this complex setting that contribute to work process dysfunction and shape managerial action within organizational structures designed to foster learning from error.

Chapter 1 explores role-based sources of work process failure arising from interdependencies among health care professionals in an organizational context featuring an electronic medical record (EMR). Interviews with providers and patients revealed professional work routines containing relational vulnerabilities to coordination failure that persisted despite—and, indeed, were potentially exacerbated by—introduction of a technology enabling high informational continuity. These findings demonstrate limitations of information processing as the dominant paradigm through which to improve coordination in complex settings and urge managers and policy-makers to complement information technology with interventions that directly address behavior within institutionalized work roles.

Chapters 2 and 3 employ a mixed methodological approach to examine organizational responses to work process failure at a high-performing teaching hospital. In Chapter 2, I explore predictors of managerial attention to identified failure within the hospital’s adverse event review system. Internalization of external regulatory priorities during review activities shifted managerial attention toward adverse events yielding less new knowledge, such as those caused by involuntary slips during practiced skills, and away from events richer in learning value, such as those involving interdisciplinary process failure. These findings reveal unintended effects of harm-driven event reporting regulation on internal learning processes and suggest the need for separate learning and compliance mechanisms in health care and other high-risk settings.

Chapter 3 examines factors associated with corrective organizational action in response to work process failure. Corrective action following an adverse event was influenced by the dual institutional forces of regulation and professionalism, manifesting in tendencies to intervene on tangible risk factors that did not interfere with autonomous practice. Findings indicate that organizations may respond to failure with varying aggressiveness and success depending on the conditions of error, demonstrating the importance of goal-setting and resource appropriation that are aligned with the challenges confronting change in complex institutionalized environments.


 
Tara Sussman Oakman
2010, Political Analysis
Current Position: Program Analyst
Current Employer: US Department of Health & Human Services, Office of the Secretary, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Office of Health Policy
Thesis Title: Polarized Politics, Public Opinion, and Health Reform
Committee Members: Blendon, Swartz, Zaslavsky, Campbell
ABSTRACT: This dissertation addresses two major health policy issues that have been debated in recent years – expanding insurance coverage to uninsured individuals and providing prescription drug coverage to the Medicare population. The first two papers focus on public opinion, with a particular emphasis on Republicans and Democrats, because, in this era of polarized politics, policymakers have a strong incentive to pay attention to the opinions of their base constituents. The focus in the third paper is opinion among pharmacists who, as essential health care providers, offer an important perspective on how the Medicare prescription drug program is functioning. Collectively, the papers aim to inform policy makers by addressing the policy and political environment in which health reforms are debated and implemented. Specifically, Paper 1 examines the individual mandate, a requirement for everyone to have insurance. Using national survey data, I find that the individual mandate lacks extensive public support. Policymakers who still choose to pursue the mandate for policy reasons can expand the base of support by incorporating it into a "shared responsibility" plan that also includes requirements for employers, government, and insurers. In Paper 2, I use national public opinion data to examine public perceptions of health care quality and access for the uninsured, and find that there is no public consensus on this issue. Party identification, age, and family income are significant predictors of perceptions of health care access for the uninsured. In addition, people who perceive that the uninsured have greater difficulty accessing care are more likely to favor national health insurance, but this relationship is moderated by party affiliation. Paper 3 employs an analysis of survey data and in-depth interviews to assess pharmacists’ perceptions of the Medicare prescription drug program (Part D). I find that pharmacists’ impressions of their administrative and financial burden under Part D, as well as how beneficiaries fare under the program, are significantly associated with pharmacists’ favorability toward it. Pharmacists working in independent pharmacies, rural areas, or pharmacies serving more Medicare beneficiaries perceive greater burden than those pharmacists working in chain-store pharmacies, urban areas, or in pharmacies that serve fewer Medicare customers, respectively.


 
Francesca Matthews Pillemer
2010, Political Analysis
Current Position: Postdoctoral Fellow
Current Employer: RAND-University of Pittsburgh Health Institute
Thesis Title: Responses to the Use of Public Health Authority
Committee Members: Blendon, Zaslavsky, Lee
ABSTRACT: The potential uses of public health authority are broad. They range from smaller powers, such as prohibiting smoking in the workplace, to greater powers, such as large scale quarantine or the forced institutional isolation of sick individuals. Across this spectrum of activity, public health officials and decision makers rely on the public to comply with public health recommendations and to maintain the political support necessary to achieve public health goals through the use of authority. This dissertation addresses the relationship between public support and public health authority on the issues of pandemic preparedness and sexual education policy. For pandemic preparedness, this dissertation also investigates the perspectives of decision makers on the uses of public health authority. Section 1 uses public opinion data from 4 countries (United States, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore) and regression techniques to explore the predictors of support for non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), such as quarantine. We find that the predictors of NPI support vary widely by region. However, ethnic subgroups are generally less supportive of punishment for non-compliance. Prior exposure to face mask usage also results in increased support for future face mask usage, as well as other NPIs. Cultural issues and prior experiences may account for the variations in response to policies. Section 2 analyzes national public opinion data with regression techniques to investigate predictors of both sexual education policy and political motivation (i.e. willingness to change a vote over this issue). Associations with political motivation are evaluated for both supporters of comprehensive sexual education and abstinence-only education. We conclude that the predictors of support for a particular type of sexual education are distinct from the predictors of political motivation at both the state and local level. Most notably, while religious affiliation and conservative ideology were both significant predictors of policy preference, religious affiliation was not a significant predictor of political motivation for abstinence-only supporters. This may reflect some form of political organization. For section 3, I conducted interviews with 15 high-level decision makers for public health emergencies in Massachusetts on the subject of altered standards of care. This section focuses on interviewees’ perceptions about the likelihood of events, sources of advice and information, ethical preferences and the decision making process. Our results indicate a low-level of consensus for ethical preferences, which were often driven by varied principles (e.g.utility, fairness, etc…) Consensus for more extreme public health interventions was greater than consensus for less extreme interventions. Importantly, not all decision makers used an ethical framework in their approach to policy preferences, which is in contrast to the current focus of the literature.


 
Chara Ryzdak
2010, Decision Sciences
Current Position: Intern
Current Employer: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Thesis Title: The Application of Decision Analytic Methods to Diverse Public Health Problems in Underserved Populations
Committee Members: Goldie, Kim, Weinstein
ABSTRACT:
The unifying theme of this dissertation is the application of decision analytic methods to diverse public health problems. The research addresses the complexities of modeling screening and treatment of chronic and infectious diseases and the policy challenges given population heterogeneities, diverse treatment strategies, and the introduction of new technologies.

Chapter I present results our analysis of syphilis screening in pregnancy and the potential impact of new screening technologies in resource poor settings. In developing countries, syphilis infection in pregnancy poses significant deleterious consequences to maternal and infant health. While treatment with penicillin is highly effective and relatively inexpensive, identification and timely treatment of infected women often falls short due to logistical and technical obstacles. New rapid testing technologies have become available with the potential to improve diagnosis and treatment of infection during pregnancy. We developed a Markov model of the natural history of syphilis and pregnancy in women in the sub-Saharan Africa setting in order to assess the benefits, cost-effectiveness and policy implications of universal on-site prenatal syphilis screening and treatment using rapid diagnostic tests versus standard testing methods. Our analysis showed that syphilis screening with new rapid tests that allow for same day testing and treatment was highly cost-effective and had the potential to provide substantial benefits by preventing syphilis transmission and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Chapter II describes our calibration of a 1st order Monte Carlo simulation model of the natural history and treatment of HIV infection, which incorporates components of both infectious and chronic disease modeling. Previously, model natural history parameter estimates were primarily derived from data from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS)—a longitudinal study of HIV/AIDS in gay and bisexual men. Recently, the model was adapted to address questions relevant to U.S. HIV-infected women using data from the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS). Motivated by parameter changes and assumptions related to use of the WIHS dataset, we assessed the internal consistency of the newly parameterized natural history model by exploring the ability to achieve good visual fits to the empiric survival data for untreated HIV-infected women. We evaluated model performance and characterized uncertainties associated with model assumptions using calibration techniques in addition to exploring model external validity in estimating treatment survival using a unique subset of WIHS empiric survival data for women who received ART.

Chapter III examines the cost-effectiveness and trade-offs between methods for treating panic disorder. Panic disorder is often debilitating, resulting in numerous lost workdays and reduced overall productivity. We developed a 1st order Monte Carlo simulation model of the natural history of panic disorder and treatment to assess the cost effectiveness and the impact of different treatment strategies on burden of disease; this analysis represents a significant extension of modeling research in the area of mental health. Our analysis supports conclusions that treatment of panic disorder is cost-effective even at low cost-effectiveness thresholds and can substantially reduce time spent with disease. However, intervention characteristics, patient heterogeneities and disease course have important implications on treatment choice.


 
Lindsay Sabik
2010, Economics
Current Position: Assistant Professor
Current Employer: Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine
Thesis Title: Market Dynamics and Health Care for the Uninsured
Committee Members: Chernew, Newhouse, O'Malley
ABSTRACT:
This dissertation investigates trends in health care for the uninsured and the role of market-level factors in determining their access to and use of care. The first chapter considers trends in care for the uninsured and in the disparity between uninsured and privately insured nonelderly adults. Using three data sets, I consider trends in access to health care, control of chronic diseases, and acute heart attack care. I find that trends in outcomes for the uninsured have generally been stable from the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s, with fluctuation in some measures over shorter periods within this window. In addition, there is a persistent disparity between the privately insured and uninsured in most measures.

In chapter two, I investigate the effect of the uninsurance rate in a market on access to care for the uninsured and the insured, using a market fixed effects approach. I also consider the role of time-varying market-level factors and instrument for the uninsurance rate using a two-stage residual inclusion approach. I find that the causal effect of the rate of uninsurance in the community on access to care for the uninsured is negative. In contrast, estimates for the insured are small and insignificant. Unlike earlier research, these results imply that there are no spillover effects of uninsurance on access to care for the insured. Thus, policies that expand health insurance coverage may affect access to care for the uninsured but have little effect on access for those who are already insured.

The types of institutions that comprise the health care safety net vary in their structure and function, and there is geographic and temporal variation in the availability of and support for different types of safety net providers. In chapter three, I consider the association between particular types of safety net institutions (specifically, teaching hospitals and federally qualified health centers) and access to and use of care for the uninsured at the market level in both 2003 and in 1996. I find that the presence of teaching hospitals and the presence of health centers are correlated with different aspects of access and use among the uninsured.


 
Anna Sinaiko
2010, Economics
Current Position: Research Fellow
Current Employer: Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management
Thesis Title: Essays on Consumer Behavior in Health Care
Committee Members: Newhouse, Frank, McGuire, Rosenthal
ABSTRACT: Consumer use of information and whether consumers make decisions that are in their own best interest have important implications for the quality and efficiency of the health care system. This dissertation consists of three essays that seek to improve our understanding of consumer-decision making in health care settings. The first essay (with Meredith Rosenthal) considers consumer experience with tiered physician networks. Tiered physician networks use financial incentives and quality information to encourage consumers to seek care from “preferred” physicians. We developed a survey to assess consumer’s awareness, use and trust of these networks included in health plans offered by the Massachusetts Group Insurance Commission (GIC). Half of respondents reported prior knowledge of the tiered networks and one-fifth knew which tier one of their doctors is in. Respondents who learned their doctor’s tier before their first visit were more likely to find this information important. The paper concludes with a discussion of the potential for these networks to influence consumer behavior and the cost-efficiency and quality of health care. The second essay (with Richard Hirth) analyzes the health plan choices made by employees at a University when the set of health plans offered by their employer includes a dominated plan -- a plan that is the same or worse than another available plan on all dimensions and worse than that plan on at least one dimension for all possible health states. During the study period, approximately one-third of workers were enrolled in the dominated plan. For some this choice may be explained by inertia, i.e., individuals who may have selected the plan before it was dominated and then failed to switch out of it. However, a substantial number of employees selected the suboptimal plan when their initial choice set included both good and bad options. We observe differences in enrollment in the dominated plan and in decisions to switch out of it by gender. This evidence supports alternative economic models than that of the rational consumer, and suggests that health reform that relies heavily on consumer choice may result in unintended and inefficient outcomes. The third essay returns to the context of tiered provider networks and analyzes how consumers might respond to tiered physician networks and whether consumer response is sensitive to the amount of differential cost-sharing across tiers and to the tiered doctor’s specialty. As part of a survey of GIC members who are enrolled in a health plan with a tiered physician network, we presented respondents with a hypothetical set of tiered networks that varied according to the co-payment required for physicians in the non-preferred tier ($!5/$25/$50) and the type of physician who was tiered (cardiologist/dermatologist). Respondents were less likely to say that they would choose to make an appointment with a Tier 1 doctor when they had a recommendation from another source for a Tier 2 doctor; individuals selecting a dermatologist and facing the largest co-payment difference across tiers were more likely to select a physician from the preferred tier (Tier 1). Among respondents who said they would choose a Tier 1 doctor, the doctor’s ranking is more important than the co-payment differential across the tiers. Simulation results suggest that the co-payment differential across tiers that is necessary to counteract the impact of a friend, family member or personal doctor’s recommendation for a Tier 2 physician is considerably larger than the current levels in the GIC health plans.